Bourbaki

Example

Tag 0BPR, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BPR].

General Topology, chapter IV, § 2. Fundamental topological properties of the real line

Let us define by induction a countable family (In,p)(I_{n,p}) of mutually disjoint open intervals as follows: The integer nn takes all values ⩾0\geqslant 0, and for each value of nn, pp takes the values 1,2,3,…,2n1, 2, 3, \ldots, 2^n. All the intervals In,pI_{n,p} are contained in

A=[0,1], A = [0, 1],
and we take I0,1=]1/3,2/3[I_{0,1} = ]1/3, 2/3[ (the "middle third" of ]0,1[]0, 1[). Suppose now that the 2m+1−12^{m+1} - 1 intervals In,pI_{n,p} have been defined for 0≤n≤m0 \leq n \leq m in such a way that, if JmJ_m is their union, the set A∩∁JmA \cap \complement J_m is the union of 2m+12^{m+1} mutually disjoint closed intervals Km,pK_{m,p} (1≤p≤2m+11 \leq p \leq 2^{m+1}) each of length 13m+1\frac{1}{3^{m+1}}. If Km,p=[a,b]K_{m,p} = [a, b] we then take Im+1,pI_{m+1,p} to be the open interval [a+b−a3,b−a3]\left[ a + \frac{b-a}{3}, \frac{b-a}{3} \right] (the "middle third" of the interval ]a,b[]a, b[), and it is immediately verified that the induction can continue in this way (Fig. 3).

!Diagram showing intervals I_{2,1}, I_{1,1}, I_{2,2}, I_{0,1}, I_{2,3}, I_{1,2}, I_{2,4} and corresponding intervals K_{2,1}, K_{2,2}, K_{2,3}, K_{2,4}, K_{1,1}, K_{1,2}, K_{1,3}, K_{1,4}, K_{0,1}, K_{0,2}

Figure 3.

If K′K' is the complement of the union of the In,pI_{n,p}, the closed set K=A∩K′K = A \cap K' is called Cantor's triadic set. Clearly KK is compact (no. 2, Theorem 2); also KK is totally disconnected. For if KK contained an interval II of length >0> 0, then II would be contained in some interval Km,pK_{m,p}; hence its length would be ≤1/3m+1\leq 1/3^{m+1} for each mm, which is absurd.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.