Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 0C0J, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0C0J].

General Topology, chapter VIII, § 3. Infinite sums and products of complex numbers

A family (zi)(z_i) of complex numbers zi=ri(cos⁡θi+isin⁡θi)z_i = r_i (\cos \theta_i + i \sin \theta_i) is multipliable if and only if the family (ri)(r_i) of absolute values of the ziz_i is multipliable in R+∗\mathbf{R}_+^* and the family (θi)(\theta_i) of amplitudes of the ziz_i is summable in the group of angles A\mathfrak{A}.

In view of the structure of the group C∗\mathbf{C}^* (§\S 1, no. 3, Proposition 1), the proposition is an immediate consequence of Proposition 4 of Chapter III, §\S 5, no. 4.

If we map each angle θ\theta to that one of its measures (to any given base aa) which belongs to the interval ]−12a,12a]] - \frac{1}{2} a, \frac{1}{2} a ], we have a local isomorphism of A\mathfrak{A} with R\mathbf{R} (§\S 2, no. 2); since lim⁡θi=0\lim \theta_i = 0 with respect to the filter of complements of finite subsets of II, we may replace the condition (in the statement of Proposition 2) that the family θi\theta_i should be summable in A\mathfrak{A} by the condition that the family (ti)(t_i) of measures of the angles θi\theta_i which belong to ]−12a,12a]] - \frac{1}{2} a, \frac{1}{2} a ] should be summable in R\mathbf{R}.

The following theorem gives another criterion for a family of complex numbers, put in the form (1+ui)(1 + u_i), to be multipliable in C∗\mathbf{C}^*. (It generalizes Theorem 4 of Chapter IV, §\S 7, no. 4; see also Chapter IX, Appendix, no. 2, Proposition 1):

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.