Bourbaki

Lemma 3

Tag 0C91, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0C91].

General Topology, chapter IX, § 6. Polish spaces, Souslin spaces, Borel sets

Every metric space X of countable type possesses a sifting. If also X is zero-dimensional, then X has a strict sifting.

Note first that if YY is a metric space of countable type and if ε\varepsilon is a real number >0> 0, then there is a countable covering of YY by sets of diameter ≤ε\leq \varepsilon (§2§ 2, no. 8, Proposition 13). If, moreover, YY is zero-dimensional, there is such a covering (Vn)(V_n) formed of sets which are both open and closed; if WnW_n is the intersection of VnV_n and ⋂k<n(Y−Vk)\bigcap_{k < n} (Y - V_k), we see that the WnW_n are closed, of diameter ≤ε\leq \varepsilon, pairwise disjoint and cover XX. In any case, the closures of the non-empty sets of the covering form a countable covering of YY whose elements are non-empty closed sets of diameter ≤ε\leq \varepsilon.

Let XX be a metric space of countable type. Let C0C_0 be the set of indices of a countable covering of XX formed of non-empty closed sets of diameter ≤1\leq 1, which are pairwise disjoint if XX is zero-dimensional; φ0\varphi_0 shall be the mapping which associates with each index c∈C0c \in C_0 the corresponding set of the covering. Suppose that we have already defined the CiC_i and the φi\varphi_i and the surjective mappings pi:Ci+1→Cip_i : C_{i+1} \to C_i for i≤ni \leq n in such a way that condition b) is satisfied for these indices. If c∈Cnc \in C_n, the space φn(c)\varphi_n(c) has a countable covering by non-empty closed sets of diameter ≤1/2n+1\leq 1/2^{n+1}, which are mutually disjoint if XX [and therefore φn(c)\varphi_n(c)] is zero-dimensional; if I(c)I(c) denotes the index set of this covering, we take cn+1c_{n+1} to be the sum of the sets I(c)I(c) as cc runs through CnC_n; for each c′∈Cn+1c' \in C_{n+1}, let pn(c′)p_n(c') denote the element c∈Cnc \in C_n such that c′∈I(c)c' \in I(c), and let φn+1(c′)\varphi_{n+1}(c') denote the set with index c′c' in the covering of φn(c)\varphi_n(c) under consideration. Clearly we thus define by induction a sifting of XX, and this sifting is strict if XX is zero-dimensional; hence Lemma 3.

Now suppose that XX is a complete metric space of countable type, and consider a sifting of XX by a sieve CC and mappings φn\varphi_n. If γ=(cn)\gamma = (c_n) is a point of the space L(C)L(C) associated with CC, the sequence (φn(cn))(\varphi_n(c_n)) is a decreasing sequence of closed sets in XX whose diameters tend to 0; the intersection of this sequence of sets consists therefore of a single point, which we denote by f(γ)f(\gamma). Thus we have defined a mapping f:L(C)→Xf : L(C) \to X. If two points γ,γ′\gamma, \gamma' of L(C)L(C) have the same ii-th coordinates for i≤ni \leq n, it is clear that the distance between f(γ)f(\gamma) and f(γ′)f(\gamma') is ≤1/2n\leq 1/2^n, and therefore ff is continuous, by virtue of the definition of the topology of L(C)L(C). For each x∈Xx \in X it follows from the definition of a sifting that we can define by induction on nn a sequence γ=(cn)\gamma = (c_n) such that x∈φn(cn)x \in \varphi_n(c_n) for each n≥0n \geq 0, and cn=pn(cn+1)c_n = p_n(c_{n+1}); hence x=f(γ)x = f(\gamma) and so ff is surjective. Furthermore, if the sifting is strict, the sequence γ=(cn)\gamma = (c_n) such that x=f(γ)x = f(\gamma) is unique, and so in this case ff is bijective. ff is said to be the mapping induced by the sifting considered.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.