Bourbaki

Theorem 4

Tag 0C9B, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0C9B].

General Topology, chapter IX, § 6. Polish spaces, Souslin spaces, Borel sets

Let X be a Polish space and let R be an equivalence relation on X, such that the equivalence classes mod R are closed in X and the saturation (with respect to R) of each closed set in X is a Borel set. Then there is a Borel set in X which meets each equivalence class in exactly one point.

Consider a metric on XX compatible with its topology, and with respect to which XX is complete. By Lemma 3 of no. 5, there exists a sifting of XX, defined by a sieve C=(Cn,pn)C = (C_n, p_n) and a sequence of mappings (φn)(\varphi_n). For each c∈Cnc \in C_n, let gn(c)g_n(c) be the saturation of the closed set φn(c)\varphi_n(c) with respect to RR; by hypothesis, gn(c)g_n(c) is a Borel set in XX.

Since each set CnC_n is countable, we can linearly order each CnC_n in such a way that the set of elements smaller than a given element is finite. For each c∈Cnc \in C_n we define a set hn(c)h_n(c) by induction on nn, as follows. In the first place, for c∈C0c \in C_0, h0(c)h_0(c) is the intersection of φ0(c)\varphi_0(c) and the sets X−g0(c′)X - g_0(c'), where c′∈C0c' \in C_0 and c′<cc' < c. For c∈Cn+1c \in C_{n+1}, hn+1(c)h_{n+1}(c) is the intersection of φn+1(c),hn(Pn(c))\varphi_{n+1}(c), h_n(P_n(c)) and the sets X−gn+1(c′)X - g_{n+1}(c') for c′∈Cn+1c' \in C_{n+1}, pn(c′)=pn(c)p_n(c') = p_n(c) and c′<cc' < c. The hn(c)h_n(c) are clearly Borel sets.

We shall prove the following assertion: for each integer n≥0n \geq 0 and each equivalence class HH mod RR, there is a unique element c∈Cnc \in C_n such that hn(c)h_n(c) meets HH, and we have

h(cn)∩H=φn(c)∩H, h(c_n) \cap H = \varphi_n(c) \cap H,
which is therefore a closed set. For n=0n = 0, consider the smallest element c∈C0c \in C_0 such that φ0(c)\varphi_0(c) meets HH; then φ0(c)∩H\varphi_0(c) \cap H does not meet any set g0(c′)g_0(c') for which c′∈C0c' \in C_0 and c′<cc' < c; hence it is contained in h0(c)∩Hh_0(c) \cap H and consequently is equal to this set; moreover, we have H⊂g0(c)H \subset g_0(c) and therefore h0(c′)∩Hh_0(c') \cap H is empty for c′∈C0c' \in C_0 and c′>cc' > c; thus the assertion is proved for n=0n = 0. We continue by induction on nn: if there exists c∈Cn+1c \in C_{n+1} such that hn+1(c)h_{n+1}(c) meets HH, then it follows from the relation hn+1(c)⊂hn(pn(c))h_{n+1}(c) \subset h_n(p_n(c)) and the inductive hypothesis that pn(c)p_n(c) is the unique element d∈Cnd \in C_n such that hn(d)h_n(d) meets HH. Observe that hn(d)h_n(d), which is contained in φn(d)\varphi_n(d), is contained in the union of the sets φn(c)\varphi_n(c) for which c∈pn−1(d)c \in p_n^{-1}(d), by the definition of a sifting; there is therefore a smallest element c∈pn−1(d)c \in p_n^{-1}(d) such that φn+1(c)\varphi_{n+1}(c) meets HH. We have therefore
φn+1(c)∩H⊂φn(d)∩H=hn(d)∩H \varphi_{n+1}(c) \cap H \subset \varphi_n(d) \cap H = h_n(d) \cap H
by the inductive hypothesis. Hence
φn+1(c)∩H⊂φn+1(c)∩hn(d), \varphi_{n+1}(c) \cap H \subset \varphi_{n+1}(c) \cap h_n(d),
and since by definition φn+1(c)∩H\varphi_{n+1}(c) \cap H meets none of the sets gn+1(c′)g_{n+1}(c') for which c′∈pn−1(d)c' \in p_n^{-1}(d) and c′<cc' < c, it follows from the definition of hn+1(c)h_{n+1}(c) that φn+1(c)∩H=hn+1(c)∩H\varphi_{n+1}(c) \cap H = h_{n+1}(c) \cap H. Moreover, we have H⊂gn+1(c)H \subset g_{n+1}(c) and therefore, if c′∈pn−1(d)c' \in p_n^{-1}(d) is such that c′>cc' > c, hn+1(c′)∩Hh_{n+1}(c') \cap H is empty. Hence the assertion is proved for all nn.

For each integer nn, let SnS_n be the union of the sets hn(c)h_n(c), where cc runs through CnC_n. The set SnS_n is a Borel set, and we have Sn+1⊂SnS_{n+1} \subset S_n.

Let S be the intersection of the sets S_n, which is also a Borel set in X; we shall show that S meets each equivalence class H mod R in exactly one point. For each n, let c_n(H) be the unique element c \in C_n such that h_{c_n(H)} meets H; then S_n \cap H = \varphi_n(c_n(H)) \cap H, and S \cap H is the intersection of the sets \varphi_n(c_n(H)) \cap H. Since the sequence (c_n(H)) belongs to L.C., the decreasing sequence of closed sets \varphi_n(c_n(H)), whose diameter tends to 0, converges to a point x \in X, since X is complete. The intersection of the closed sets \varphi_n(c_n(H)) \cap H therefore consists of the point x alone, and the proof of Theorem 4 is complete.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.