Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 0CF8, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CF8].

General Topology, chapter X, § 4. Approximation of continuous real-valued functions

Let XX be a compact space, YY a normed space over R\mathbf{R} and HH a subset of C(X;R)\mathscr{C}(X; \mathbf{R}). If every continuous real-valued function on XX can be uniformly approximated by functions of HH, then every continuous mapping ff of XX into YY can be uniformly approximated by linear combinations of functions of HH with coefficients in YY.

Given any real number ε>0\varepsilon > 0, for each x∈Xx \in X there exists an open neighbourhood of xx in which the oscillation of ff is ≤ε\leq \varepsilon. Hence there is a finite open covering (Ai)1≤i≤n(A_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n} of XX such that the oscillation of ff in each AiA_i is ≤ε\leq \varepsilon. Let aia_i be a value of ff in AiA_i (1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n), and let (ui)1≤i≤n(u_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n} be a continuous partition of unity subordinate to the covering (Ai)(A_i) (Chapter IX, § 4, no. 4, Corollary to Proposition 4). Let xx be any point of XX. For each index ii such that x∉Aix \notin A_i, we have ui(x)=0u_i(x) = 0, and for each index ii such that x∈Aix \in A_i we have ∥f(x)−ai∥≤ε\|f(x) - a_i\| \leq \varepsilon; it follows that

∥f(x)−∑i=1naiui(x)∥=∥∑i=1n(f(x)−ai)ui(x)∥≤ε∑i=1nui(x)=ε. \left\| f(x) - \sum_{i=1}^n a_i u_i(x) \right\| = \left\| \sum_{i=1}^n (f(x) - a_i) u_i(x) \right\| \leq \varepsilon \sum_{i=1}^n u_i(x) = \varepsilon.

On the other hand, by hypothesis there is a function vi∈Hv_i \in H such that

∣ui(x)−vi(x)∣≤ε∑j=1n∥aj∥ |u_i(x) - v_i(x)| \leq \frac{\varepsilon}{\sum_{j=1}^n \|a_j\|}

for all x∈Xx \in X (1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n); hence we have

∥f(x)−∑i=1naivi(x)∥≤2εfor all x∈X, \left\| f(x) - \sum_{i=1}^n a_i v_i(x) \right\| \leq 2\varepsilon \quad \text{for all } x \in X,

and the proof is complete.

From Proposition 5 it follows that, to each of the propositions in which we have proved that a certain subset HH of C(X;R)\mathscr{C}(X; \mathbf{R}) is dense, there corresponds an analogous proposition for continuous mappings of XX into an arbitrary normed space YY. We shall write down explicitly only the proposition which corresponds in this way to Theorem 3. Given a set HH of real-valued functions on XX, a polynomial in the functions of HH, with coefficients in YY, is defined to be any linear combination, with coefficients in YY, of products of a finite (possibly empty) family of functions belonging to HH. Then:

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.