Proposition 1
Tag 0CJI, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CJI].
Commutative Algebra, chapter VIII, § 1. Dimension de Krull d’un anneau
Let X be a topological space. a) If Y is a subspace of X, then , and for every point y of Y. b) Let x be a point of X and V a neighbourhood of x in X. Then . c) Let be a finite family of closed subsets of X such that . Then and, for every point x of X, one has , where denotes the set of such that .
Let us prove a). If Z is an irreducible closed subset of Y, its closure in X is irreducible (II, § 4, No. 1, Prop. 2), and one has . Thus every chain c of irreducible closed subsets of Y defines, by passing to the closure in X, a chain of irreducible closed subsets of X, of the same length as c. The inequality follows from this. If U is an open subset of X containing a point y of Y, then therefore , whence . Let us prove b). By definition one has , and the opposite inequality follows from a). Let us prove c). Let be a chain of irreducible closed subsets of X. One has and each of the sets is closed in ;
since I is finite, is contained in one of the . Consequently, one has , whence equality by a).
Now let be a point of and , where is as in the statement. One has by a), and, to establish equality, one may suppose finite. For every , let be an open neighbourhood of in , such that . Put ; the set is open in . Moreover, one has by the preceding paragraph, hence .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.