Bourbaki

Lemma 1

Tag 0CKM, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CKM].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VIII, § 1. Dimension de Krull d’un anneau

Let MM be a finitely generated AA-module and dd an integer. a) In order that MM be of type C≤dC_{\leq d}, it is necessary and sufficient that z(M)∈Z≤dz(M) \in Z_{\leq d}; the projection zd(M)z_d(M) of z(M)z(M) on ZdZ_d parallel to Z≤d−1Z_{\leq d-1} is then given by

zd(M)=∑dim⁡(A/p)=dlongAp(Mp).[V(p)]. z_d(M) = \sum_{\dim(A/p) = d} \mathrm{long}_{A_p}(M_p).[V(p)].
b) In order that MM be of type C>dC^{>d}, it is necessary and sufficient that z(M)∈Z>dz(M) \in Z^{>d}; the projection zd(M)z^d(M) of z(M)z(M) on ZdZ^d parallel to Z>d+1Z^{>d+1} is then given by
zd(M)=∑ht(p)=dlongAp(Mp).[V(p)]. z^d(M) = \sum_{\mathrm{ht}(p) = d} \mathrm{long}_{A_p}(M_p).[V(p)].

In order that MM be of type C≤dC_{\leq d}, that is to say of dimension ≤d\leq d, it is necessary and sufficient that for every minimal prime ideal pp of Supp(M)\mathrm{Supp}(M), one have dim⁡(A/p)≤d\dim(A/p) \leq d, which means that z(M)∈Z≤dz(M) \in Z_{\leq d}. Suppose that one has dim⁡(M)≤d\dim(M) \leq d, and let p∈Spec(A)p \in \mathrm{Spec}(A) be such that dim⁡(A/p)=d\dim(A/p) = d; then either p∉Supp(M)p \notin \mathrm{Supp}(M) and hence Mp=0M_p = 0, or else p∈Supp(M)p \in \mathrm{Supp}(M), and pp is a minimal element of Supp(M)\mathrm{Supp}(M); in both cases the coefficient of [V(p)][V(p)] in z(M)z(M) is longAp(Mp)\mathrm{long}_{A_p}(M_p), whence a). Part b) is proved analogously; it should be noted that a finitely generated module MM is of type C>dC^{>d} if and only if one has Mp=0M_p = 0 for every prime ideal pp of height <d< d.

According to Prop. 9, c) and Remark 3 of No. 4, the sets C≤dC_{\leq d} and C>dC^{>d} are hereditary (A, VIII, § 10, No. 1, Def. 1), and one may consider the corresponding Grothendieck groups K(C≤d)K(C_{\leq d}) and K(C>d)K(C^{>d}) (loc. cit., No. 2); for every AA-module MM of type C≤dC_{\leq d} (resp. C>dC^{>d}), let [M]≤d[M]_{\leq d} (resp. [M]>d[M]^{>d}) denote the associated element in K(C≤d)K(C_{\leq d}) (resp. K(C>d)K(C^{>d})). By Lemma 1, the mappings zdz_d and zdz^d are additive; there therefore exist (loc. cit., Prop. 3) homomorphisms

ζd:K(C≤d)→Zd,ζd:K(C>d)→Zd \zeta_d : K(C_{\leq d}) \to Z_d,\quad \zeta^d : K(C^{>d}) \to Z^d
such that ζd([M]≤d)=zd(M)\zeta_d([M]_{\leq d}) = z_d(M) for every AA-module MM of type C≤dC_{\leq d} and ζd([N]>d)=zd(N)\zeta^d([N]^{>d}) = z^d(N) for every AA-module NN of type C>dC^{>d}. Moreover, since C≤d−1⊂C≤dC_{\leq d-1} \subset C_{\leq d} and C>d+1⊂C>dC^{>d+1} \subset C^{>d}, one has canonical homomorphisms
id:K(C≤d−1)→K(C≤d)andid:K(C>d+1)→K(C>d). i_d : K(C_{\leq d-1}) \to K(C_{\leq d})\quad \text{and}\quad i^d : K(C^{>d+1}) \to K(C^{>d}).
With these notations:

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.