Let M be a finitely generated A-module and d an integer. a) In order that M be of type C≤d, it is necessary and sufficient that z(M)∈Z≤d; the projection zd(M) of z(M) on Zd parallel to Z≤d−1 is then given by
zd(M)=dim(A/p)=d∑longAp(Mp).[V(p)]. b)
In order that M be of type C>d, it is necessary and sufficient that z(M)∈Z>d; the projection zd(M) of z(M) on Zd parallel to Z>d+1 is then given by zd(M)=ht(p)=d∑longAp(Mp).[V(p)].
In order that M be of type C≤d, that is to say of dimension ≤d, it is necessary and sufficient that for every minimal prime ideal p of Supp(M), one have dim(A/p)≤d, which means that z(M)∈Z≤d. Suppose that one has dim(M)≤d, and let p∈Spec(A) be such that dim(A/p)=d; then either p∈/Supp(M) and hence Mp=0, or else p∈Supp(M), and p is a minimal element of Supp(M); in both cases the coefficient of [V(p)] in z(M) is longAp(Mp), whence a). Part b) is proved analogously; it should be noted that a finitely generated module M is of type C>d if and only if one has Mp=0 for every prime ideal p of height <d.
According to Prop. 9, c) and Remark 3 of No. 4, the sets C≤d and C>d are hereditary (A, VIII, § 10, No. 1, Def. 1), and one may consider the corresponding Grothendieck groups K(C≤d) and K(C>d) (loc. cit., No. 2); for every A-module M of type C≤d (resp. C>d), let [M]≤d (resp. [M]>d) denote the associated element in K(C≤d) (resp. K(C>d)). By Lemma 1, the mappings zd and zd are additive; there therefore exist (loc. cit., Prop. 3) homomorphisms
ζd:K(C≤d)→Zd,ζd:K(C>d)→Zd such that
ζd([M]≤d)=zd(M) for every
A-module
M of type
C≤d and
ζd([N]>d)=zd(N) for every
A-module
N of type
C>d. Moreover, since
C≤d−1⊂C≤d and
C>d+1⊂C>d, one has canonical homomorphisms
id:K(C≤d−1)→K(C≤d)andid:K(C>d+1)→K(C>d). With these notations:
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.