Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 0CM5, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CM5].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VIII, § 2. Dimension des algèbres

*Let k′k' be an extension of kk, AA a k-algebra of finite type and BB a k′k'-algebra of finite type.

a) The k′k'-algebra A⊗kBA \otimes_k B is of finite type and one has

dim⁡(A⊗kB)=dim⁡(A)+dim⁡(B). \dim(A \otimes_k B) = \dim(A) + \dim(B).

b) Let rr be a prime ideal of A⊗kBA \otimes_k B; let pp (resp. qq) denote the inverse image of rr in AA (resp. BB). One has

dim⁡r(A⊗kB)=dim⁡p(A)+dim⁡q(B). \dim_r(A \otimes_k B) = \dim_p(A) + \dim_q(B).

Put n=dim⁡(A)n = \dim(A) and m=dim⁡(B)m = \dim(B). By Cor. 1 to Theorem 3 there exist injective algebra homomorphisms φ:k[X1,...,Xn]→A\varphi : k[X_1, ..., X_n] \to A and ψ:k′[Y1,...,Ym]→B\psi : k'[Y_1, ..., Y_m] \to B making AA and BB respectively finite algebras over k[X1,...,Xn]k[X_1, ..., X_n] and k′[Y1,...,Ym]k'[Y_1, ..., Y_m]. The homomorphism φ⊗ψ\varphi \otimes \psi is then injective and makes A⊗kBA \otimes_k B into a finite algebra over the k′k'-algebra k[X1,...,Xn]⊗kk′[Y1,...,Ym]k[X_1, ..., X_n] \otimes_k k'[Y_1, ..., Y_m], which is identified with k′[X1,...,Xn,Y1,...,Ym]k'[X_1, ..., X_n, Y_1, ..., Y_m]. Therefore dim⁡(A⊗kB)=n+m\dim(A \otimes_k B) = n + m by Cor. 1 to Theorem 3, which proves a).

Let us remark that when AA and BB are integral, A⊗kBA \otimes_k B is a torsion-free k′[X1,...,Xn,Y1,...,Ym]k'[X_1, ..., X_n, Y_1, ..., Y_m]-module by Lemma 4, and that therefore one has

dim⁡r(A⊗kB)=n+m=dim⁡(A)+dim⁡(B) \dim_r(A \otimes_k B) = n + m = \dim(A) + \dim(B)
for every prime ideal rr of A⊗kBA \otimes_k B by Remark 1.

Prove now b). Let r0r_0 be a minimal prime ideal of A⊗kBA \otimes_k B contained in rr, and denote by p0p_0 (resp. q0q_0) the inverse image of r0r_0 in AA (resp. BB). The ring

(A \otimes_k B)/r_0 is isomorphic to a quotient of the ring (A/p_0) \otimes_k (B/q_0). We have therefore, by aa,

dim⁡((A⊗kB)/r0)≤dim⁡(A/p0)+dim⁡(B/q0). \dim((A \otimes_k B)/r_0) \leq \dim(A/p_0) + \dim(B/q_0).

Applying cor. 5 to th. 3, we deduce the inequality

dim⁡r(A⊗kB)≤dim⁡p(A)+dim⁡q(B). \dim_r(A \otimes_k B) \leq \dim_p(A) + \dim_q(B).

Conversely, let p0p_0 (resp. q0q_0) be a minimal prime ideal of A (resp. B) contained in pp (resp. q). According to the remark made above, we have

dim⁡(A/p0)+dim⁡(B/q0)=dim⁡r‾((A/p0)⊗k(B/q0)) \dim(A/p_0) + \dim(B/q_0) = \dim_{\overline{r}}((A/p_0) \otimes_k (B/q_0))

where r‾\overline{r} is the image of r by the canonical surjection A⊗kB→(A/p0)⊗k(B/q0)A \otimes_k B \to (A/p_0) \otimes_k (B/q_0). The second member of the preceding equality is obviously less than dim⁡r(A⊗kB)\dim_r(A \otimes_k B). Applying cor. 5 to th. 3, we deduce the inequality

dim⁡p(A)+dim⁡q(B)≤dim⁡r(A⊗kB), \dim_p(A) + \dim_q(B) \leq \dim_r(A \otimes_k B),

which completes the proof.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.