*Let k′ be an extension of k, A a k-algebra of finite type and B a k′-algebra of finite type.
a) The k′-algebra A⊗kB is of finite type and one has
dim(A⊗kB)=dim(A)+dim(B).
b) Let r be a prime ideal of A⊗kB; let p (resp. q) denote the inverse image of r in A (resp. B). One has
dimr(A⊗kB)=dimp(A)+dimq(B).
Put n=dim(A) and m=dim(B). By Cor. 1 to Theorem 3 there exist injective algebra homomorphisms φ:k[X1,...,Xn]→A and ψ:k′[Y1,...,Ym]→B making A and B respectively finite algebras over k[X1,...,Xn] and k′[Y1,...,Ym]. The homomorphism φ⊗ψ is then injective and makes A⊗kB into a finite algebra over the k′-algebra k[X1,...,Xn]⊗kk′[Y1,...,Ym], which is identified with k′[X1,...,Xn,Y1,...,Ym]. Therefore dim(A⊗kB)=n+m by Cor. 1 to Theorem 3, which proves a).
Let us remark that when A and B are integral, A⊗kB is a torsion-free k′[X1,...,Xn,Y1,...,Ym]-module by Lemma 4, and that therefore one has
dimr(A⊗kB)=n+m=dim(A)+dim(B) for every prime ideal
r of
A⊗kB by Remark 1.
Prove now b). Let r0 be a minimal prime ideal of A⊗kB contained in r, and denote by p0 (resp. q0) the inverse image of r0 in A (resp. B). The ring
(A \otimes_k B)/r_0 is isomorphic to a quotient of the ring (A/p_0) \otimes_k (B/q_0). We have therefore, by a,
dim((A⊗kB)/r0)≤dim(A/p0)+dim(B/q0).
Applying cor. 5 to th. 3, we deduce the inequality
dimr(A⊗kB)≤dimp(A)+dimq(B).
Conversely, let p0 (resp. q0) be a minimal prime ideal of A (resp. B) contained in p (resp. q). According to the remark made above, we have
dim(A/p0)+dim(B/q0)=dimr((A/p0)⊗k(B/q0))
where r is the image of r by the canonical surjection A⊗kB→(A/p0)⊗k(B/q0). The second member of the preceding equality is obviously less than dimr(A⊗kB). Applying cor. 5 to th. 3, we deduce the inequality
dimp(A)+dimq(B)≤dimr(A⊗kB),
which completes the proof.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.