Let A be a noetherian ring, p0⊂...⊂pn a chain of prime ideals of A of length n⩾1, and x an element of pn. There exists a chain p0′⊂...⊂pn′ with p0′=p0, pn′=pn and x∈p1′.
We reason by induction on n, the case n=1 being trivial. Suppose therefore that one has n⩾2 and that x does not belong to pn−1. Let pn−1′ be a minimal element of the set of prime ideals of A contained in pn′=pn and containing pn−2+Ax (II, § 2, No. 6, lemma 2). By prop. 1, the ideal pn−1′/pn−2 of the ring A/pn−2 is of height 1, and since pn−2⊂pn−1⊂pn is a chain of length 2, the same is true of pn−2⊂pn−1′⊂pn′. One has x∈pn−1′. The induction hypothesis applied to the chain p0⊂p1⊂...⊂pn−2⊂pn−1′ shows that there exists a chain p0′⊂p1′⊂...⊂pn−2′⊂pn−1′ with x∈p1′ and p0′=p0. The chain
p0′⊂p1′⊂...⊂pn−1′⊂pn′
satisfies the required conditions.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.