Bourbaki

Remark 1

Tag 0CMW, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CMW].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VIII, § 3. Dimension des anneaux noethériens

It follows from formulas (6) and (7) that S is secant for M if and only if it is secant for A/αA/\alpha, where α\alpha is the annihilator of M. 2) Let S and S’ be two disjoint subsets of mAm_A. For S∪S′S \cup S' to be secant for M, it is necessary and sufficient that S be secant for M and S’ secant for M′=M/SMM' = M/SM. This follows from inequality (8) and the formula

Card(S∪S′)+dim⁡A(M/(SM+S′M))−dim⁡A(M)==(Card(S)+dim⁡A(M/SM)−dim⁡A(M))++(Card(S′)+dim⁡A(M′/S′M′)−dim⁡A(M′)). \text{Card}(S \cup S') + \dim_A(M/(SM + S'M)) - \dim_A(M) = = (\text{Card}(S) + \dim_A(M/SM) - \dim_A(M)) + + (\text{Card}(S') + \dim_A(M'/S'M') - \dim_A(M')) .
3) Let x∈mAx \in m_A and n≥1n \geq 1 be an integer. It is immediate that the modules M/xMM/xM and M/xnMM/x^nM have the same support, hence the same dimension. Consequently, x is secant for M if and only if xnx^n is secant for M. From this and Remark 2, one deduces at once the following result: let x1,...,xrx_1, ..., x_r be elements of mAm_A and n1,...,nrn_1, ..., n_r integers >0> 0; then the sequence (x1,...,xr)(x_1, ..., x_r) is secant for M if and only if the sequence (x1n1,...,xrnr)(x_1^{n_1}, ..., x_r^{n_r}) is secant for M.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.