Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 0CND, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CND].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VIII, § 3. Dimension des anneaux noethériens

Let A be a noetherian ring and p⊂qp \subset q a non-saturated chain of prime ideals of A. The set E of prime ideals r of A such that p⊂r⊂qp \subset r \subset q is a chain is infinite. One has ⋃r∈Er=q\bigcup_{r \in E} r = q and ⋂r∈Er=p\bigcap_{r \in E} r = p.

Replacing A by A/pA/p if necessary, one is reduced to the case where p={0}p = \{0\}.

By Lemma 1 of No. 1, one has q=⋃r∈Erq = \bigcup_{r \in E} r, and Prop. 2 of II, §1§ 1, No. 1 shows that E is infinite.

Let y≠0y \neq 0 be an element of ⋂r∈Er\bigcap_{r \in E} r. The height of q is finite (No. 1, Cor. 1 of Prop. 2), and one has ht(q)≥2\mathrm{ht}(q) \geq 2 by hypothesis. There therefore exists a prime ideal q′⊂qq' \subset q of height 2. The first part of the proof applied to q′q' shows that the set E’ of prime ideals of height 1 contained in q′q' is infinite; each of these ideals contains y by hypothesis. Now the local noetherian ring B=Aq′/yAq′B = A_{q'}/yA_{q'} is of dimension 1 by Corollary 2 of Prop. 2 of No. 1. For every r∈E′r \in E', the prime ideal r/yAq′r/yA_{q'} of B is therefore minimal; consequently, the noetherian ring B has an infinity of minimal prime ideals, which is absurd (II, §4§ 4, No. 3, Cor. 3 of Prop. 14). Hence ⋂r∈Er={0}\bigcap_{r \in E} r = \{0\}.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.