Bourbaki

Proposition 7

Tag 0CNF, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CNF].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VIII, § 3. Dimension des anneaux noethériens

Let ρ:A→B\rho : A \to B be a local homomorphism of noetherian local rings, MM a finitely generated AA-module and NN a finitely generated BB-module. Put B‾=B⊗AκA=B/ρ(mA).B\overline{B} = B \otimes_A \kappa_A = B/\rho(m_A).B and N‾=N⊗BB‾=N/ρ(mA).N\overline{N} = N \otimes_B \overline{B} = N/\rho(m_A).N. One has

dim⁡B(M⊗AN)≤dim⁡A(M)+dim⁡B(N‾), \dim_B(M \otimes_A N) \leq \dim_A(M) + \dim_B(\overline{N}),

and there is equality if NN is flat over AA.

One may suppose MM and NN non-zero. By the corollary of th. 1 (no. 2), there exists a subset SS (resp. TT) of mAm_A (resp. mBm_B) such that Card(S)=dim⁡A(M)\mathrm{Card}(S) = \dim_A(M) (resp. Card(T)=dim⁡B‾(N‾)\mathrm{Card}(T) = \dim_{\overline{B}}(\overline{N})) and that M/SMM/SM is an AA-module of finite length (resp. N‾/TN‾\overline{N}/T\overline{N} is a BB-module of finite length). One has ρ(S)⊂mB\rho(S) \subset m_B. Let EE be the BB-module M⊗ANM \otimes_A N; the BB-module E/(ρ(S).E+T.E)E/(\rho(S).E + T.E) is isomorphic to M/SM⊗AN/TNM/SM \otimes_A N/TN, hence is of finite length: by props. 18 and 19 of II, § 4, no. 4, one has

Supp(M/SM⊗AN/TN)=Supp(N/TN)∩aρ−1(Supp(M/SM))=Supp(N/TN)∩aρ−1(Supp(κA))=Supp(N/TN⊗AκA)=Supp(N‾/TN‾)={mB}. \begin{align*} \mathrm{Supp}(M/SM \otimes_A N/TN) &= \mathrm{Supp}(N/TN) \cap {}^a\rho^{-1}(\mathrm{Supp}(M/SM)) \\ &= \mathrm{Supp}(N/TN) \cap {}^a\rho^{-1}(\mathrm{Supp}(\kappa_A)) \\ &= \mathrm{Supp}(N/TN \otimes_A \kappa_A) = \mathrm{Supp}(\overline{N}/T\overline{N}) = \{m_B\}. \end{align*}

It follows, by th. 1, that one has the inequality

dim⁡B(E)≤Card(S)+Card(T)=dim⁡A(M)+dim⁡B‾(N‾). \dim_B(E) \leq \mathrm{Card}(S) + \mathrm{Card}(T) = \dim_A(M) + \dim_{\overline{B}}(\overline{N}).

Now suppose NN flat over AA, and let us show that there is equality in formula (12). Let aa (resp. bb) be the annihilator of MM (resp. NN). By props. 18 and 19 of II, § 4, no. 4, one has

Supp(E)=Supp(N)∩aρ−1(Supp(M))=V(b)∩aρ−1(V(a))=V(b+ρ(a).B). \begin{align*} \mathrm{Supp}(E) &= \mathrm{Supp}(N) \cap {}^a\rho^{-1}(\mathrm{Supp}(M)) \\ &= V(b) \cap {}^a\rho^{-1}(V(a)) = V(b + \rho(a).B). \end{align*}

Hence

dim⁡B(M⊗AN)=dim⁡(B/(b+ρ(a).B)) \dim_B(M \otimes_A N) = \dim(B/(b + \rho(a).B))

and also

dim⁡A(M)+dim⁡B‾(N‾)=dim⁡(A/a)+dim⁡(B/(b+ρ(mA).B)). \dim_A(M) + \dim_{\overline{B}}(\overline{N}) = \dim(A/a) + \dim(B/(b + \rho(m_A).B)).
dim⁡(B′)≥dim⁡(A′)+dim⁡(B′/ρ′(mA′).B′) \dim(B') \geq \dim(A') + \dim(B'/\rho'(\mathfrak{m}_{A'}).B')

and since the ring B′/ρ′(mA′).B′B'/\rho'(\mathfrak{m}_{A'}).B' is isomorphic to B/(b+ρ(mA).B)B/(b + \rho(\mathfrak{m}_A).B), our assertion follows from formulas (13), (14) and (15).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.