Bourbaki

Proposition 9

Tag 0CNQ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CNQ].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VIII, § 3. Dimension des anneaux noethériens

Let AA be a noetherian ring, MM a finitely generated AA-module, aa a subset of AA stable under addition and multiplication, q1,...,qmq_1, ..., q_m prime ideals of AA not containing aa, and r≥1r \geq 1 an integer such that

codim(V(a)∩Supp⁡(M),Supp⁡(M))≥r. \text{codim}(V(a) \cap \operatorname{Supp}(M), \operatorname{Supp}(M)) \geq r .

There exists a sequence (x1,...,xr)(x_1, ..., x_r) of elements of aa, belonging to none of the ideals q1,...,qmq_1, ..., q_m, and such that the sequence (x1/1,...,xr/1)(x_1/1, ..., x_r/1) of elements of ApA_p is secant for the ApA_p-module MpM_p, for every prime ideal p∈V(a)∩Supp⁡(M)p \in V(a) \cap \operatorname{Supp}(M).

We reason by induction on rr. Suppose first that r=1r = 1, and let Φ\Phi be the (finite) set of minimal elements of Supp⁡(M)\operatorname{Supp}(M). We argue by contradiction and suppose that there exists no element x1x_1 of aa satisfying the conditions of the statement. Let x∈ax \in a, not belonging to q1∪...∪qmq_1 \cup ... \cup q_m. By hypothesis there exists an element pp of V(a)∩Supp⁡(M)V(a) \cap \operatorname{Supp}(M) such that the image x/1x/1 of xx in ApA_p is not secant for MpM_p. Let Ψ\Psi be the set of ideals q∈Φq \in \Phi contained in pp; then the minimal elements of Supp⁡(Mp)\operatorname{Supp}(M_p) are the prime ideals qApqA_p of ApA_p, where qq runs through Ψ\Psi. By Prop. 3 of No. 2, there therefore exists an element qq of Ψ\Psi such that x/1∈qApx/1 \in qA_p, whence x∈qx \in q. In other words, we have a⊂q1∪...∪qm∪⋃q∈Φqa \subset q_1 \cup ... \cup q_m \cup \bigcup_{q \in \Phi} q. Since a⊄qja \not\subset q_j for 1≤j≤m1 \leq j \leq m, Prop. 2 of II, § 1, No. 1 proves the existence of an element qq of Φ\Phi containing aa, whence

V(q)⊂V(a)∩Supp⁡(M). V(q) \subset V(a) \cap \operatorname{Supp}(M) .

Since V(a)V(a) contains an irreducible component of Supp⁡(M)\operatorname{Supp}(M), this contradicts the hypothesis

codim(V(a)∩Supp⁡(M),Supp⁡(M))≥1. \text{codim}(V(a) \cap \operatorname{Supp}(M), \operatorname{Supp}(M)) \geq 1 .

Suppose now that r≥2r \geq 2. By the induction hypothesis, one can find a sequence (x1,...,xr−1)(x_1, ..., x_{r-1}) of elements of aa, not belonging to q1∪...∪qmq_1 \cup ... \cup q_m, and such that, for every p∈V(a)∩Supp⁡(M)p \in V(a) \cap \operatorname{Supp}(M), the sequence (x1/1,...,xr−1/1)(x_1/1, ..., x_{r-1}/1) of elements of ApA_p is secant for MpM_p. Put N=M/∑i=1r−1xiMN = M / \sum_{i=1}^{r-1} x_i M. It is enough to construct an element xrx_r of aa not belonging to q1∪...∪qmq_1 \cup ... \cup q_m and such that, for every p∈V(a)∩Supp⁡(M)p \in V(a) \cap \operatorname{Supp}(M), the element xr/1x_r/1 of ApA_p is secant for NpN_p. By the first part of the proof, it is enough to establish the two relations

V(a)∩Supp⁡(M)=V(a)∩Supp⁡(N), V(a) \cap \operatorname{Supp}(M) = V(a) \cap \operatorname{Supp}(N) ,
codim(V(a)∩Supp⁡(N),Supp⁡(N))≥1. \text{codim}(V(a) \cap \operatorname{Supp}(N), \operatorname{Supp}(N)) \geq 1 .

Now one has

Supp⁡(N)=V(x1)∩...∩V(xr−1)∩Supp⁡(M) \operatorname{Supp}(N) = V(x_1) \cap ... \cap V(x_{r-1}) \cap \operatorname{Supp}(M)
m=r−1,X=Supp⁡(M),Y=V(α)∩Supp⁡(N),Hi=V(xi) m = r - 1,\quad X = \operatorname{Supp}(M),\quad Y = V(\alpha) \cap \operatorname{Supp}(N),\quad H_i = V(x_i)

whence X′=Supp⁡(N)X' = \operatorname{Supp}(N).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.