Bourbaki

Theorem 1

Tag 0CPL, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CPL].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VIII, § 5. Anneaux locaux réguliers

Let A be a local noetherian ring. The following conditions are equivalent: (i) A is regular. (ii) The ideal mAm_A is generated by a secant subset for A (§ 3, No. 2, Def. 1). (iii) The ideal mAm_A is generated by a completely secant sequence for A (A, X, p. 157, Def. 2). (iv) Let S be the symmetric algebra of the κA\kappa_A-vector space mA/mA2m_A/m_A^2, and let gr(A) = ⨁n⩾0mAn/mAn+1\bigoplus_{n \geqslant 0} m_A^n/m_A^{n+1} be the graded ring associated with A. The canonical homomorphism γ\gamma of S onto gr(A) is bijective. (v) There exists an integer r⩾0r \geqslant 0 such that one has HA,mA=(1−T)−rH_{A,m_A} = (1 - T)^{-r}, that is to say mA=0m_A = 0 if r=0r = 0 and [mAn/mAn+1:κA]=(n+r−1r−1)[m_A^n/m_A^{n+1} : \kappa_A] = \binom{n + r - 1}{r - 1} for every integer n⩾0n \geqslant 0 if r>0r > 0. (vi) One has HA,mA=(1−T)−dH_{A,m_A} = (1 - T)^{-d} with d=dim⁡(A)d = \dim(A).

If these conditions are fulfilled, every system of coordinates of A is a completely secant sequence for A.

(ii) \Rightarrow (i): for every secant subset has at most dim⁡(A)\dim(A) elements (§ 3, No. 2, Theorem 1). (iii) \Rightarrow (ii): for every completely secant sequence is secant (§ 3, No. 2, corollary to Proposition 3). (iv) \Rightarrow (iii): let (x1,...,xr)(x_1, ..., x_r) be a sequence of elements of mAm_A whose classes modulo mA2m_A^2 form a basis (ξ1,...,ξr)(\xi_1, ..., \xi_r) of mA/mA2m_A/m_A^2 over the field κA\kappa_A. If property (iv) is satisfied, gr(A)\mathrm{gr}(A) is the polynomial algebra κA[ξ1,...,ξr]\kappa_A[\xi_1, ..., \xi_r] and the sequence (x1,...,xr)(x_1, ..., x_r) is completely secant (A, X, p. 160, Theorem 1). This also proves the last assertion of Theorem 1. (i) \Rightarrow (iv): put r=[mA/mA2:κA]r = [m_A/m_A^2 : \kappa_A]. By formula (6) of § 4, No. 2, the Poincaré series of the graded vector space S over the field κA\kappa_A is equal to

PS=∑n⩾0[Sn(mA/mA2):κA]Tn=(1−T)−r. P_S = \sum_{n \geqslant 0} [S^n(m_A/m_A^2) : \kappa_A] T^n = (1 - T)^{-r}.

Suppose that the canonical homomorphism γ:S→gr(A)\gamma : S \to \mathrm{gr}(A) is not bijective. Since γ\gamma is surjective, there exists a homogeneous element uu of SS, of degree d>0d > 0, annihilated by γ\gamma. We then have

HA,mA=PS−PKer(γ)≤PS−PuS=(1−Td)/(1−T)r= H_{A,m_A} = P_S - P_{\mathrm{Ker}(\gamma)} \leq P_S - P_{uS} = (1 - T^d)/(1 - T)^r =
=(1+T+⋯+Td−1)/(1−T)r−1. = (1 + T + \cdots + T^{d-1})/(1 - T)^{r-1}.

By Theorem 3 of § 4, No. 4 and Lemma 2 of § 4, No. 1, therefore dim⁡(A)<r\dim(A) < r, and A is not regular.

Finally, let us prove the equivalence of conditions (iv) to (vi). Now (iv) means that one has HA,mA=(1−T)−sH_{A,m_A} = (1 - T)^{-s} with s=[mA/mA2:κA]s = [m_A/m_A^2 : \kappa_A]. Therefore conditions (iv), (v), (vi) mean that one has HA,mA=(1−T)−mH_{A,m_A} = (1 - T)^{-m}, with respectively m=[mA/mA2:κA]m = [m_A/m_A^2 : \kappa_A], m≥0m \geq 0, m=dim⁡(A)m = \dim(A). But if one has HA,mA=(1−T)−mH_{A,m_A} = (1 - T)^{-m}, then dim⁡(A)=m\dim(A) = m by § 4, No. 4, Theorem 3 and [mA/mA2:κA]=m[m_A/m_A^2 : \kappa_A] = m (since (1−T)−m=1+mT+⋯(1 - T)^{-m} = 1 + mT + \cdots). The equivalence of conditions (iv) to (vi) follows immediately from this.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.