Lemma 1
Tag 0CSO, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CSO].
Commutative Algebra, chapter VIII, § 7. Multiplicités
Let be a ring homomorphism, and let be a prime ideal of A. Consider the following two properties: (i) the canonical homomorphism of into is bijective; (ii) there exists a single prime ideal of B lying over and the canonical homomorphism of into is bijective. One has (i) (ii). If is minimal, or if B is integral over A, one has (i) (ii) .
1 This lemma remains valid when the ring A is not noetherian.
The ring is identified with the ring of fractions of defined by the multiplicative subset of . The prime ideals of are therefore the , where is a prime ideal of such that ; if is such an ideal, is identified with (II, § 2, No. 5, prop. 11).
If condition (i) is satisfied, there exists (V, § 2, No. 1, Lemma 1) a unique prime ideal of such that . Moreover, is identified with the ring of fractions , hence also with , where is the inverse image of by the isomorphism ; now , whence (ii).
Conversely, suppose that (ii) is satisfied, and let be the unique prime ideal of lying over . Since is identified with , it is enough to prove that is local with maximal ideal , that is to say, that every prime ideal of such that is contained in . If is minimal, one has , hence . If is integral over , there exists, by V, § 2, no. 1, cor. 2 to th. 1, a prime ideal of such that and ; necessarily one has , hence .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.