Suppose that A is semi-local; let q be an ideal of definition of A, and let ρ:A→B be a ring homomorphism making B into a finitely generated A-module. Suppose that, for every prime ideal (necessarily minimal) p of A such that dim(A/p)=dim(A), there exists a unique prime ideal r of B lying over p and that the canonical homomorphism ρp:Ap→Br is bijective. Then one has dimA(B)=dim(A) and eqA(B)=eqA(A).
Let SA (resp. SB) be the set of prime ideals p of A such that
dim(A/p)=dim(A)(resp. dimA(B/pB)=dimA(B));
one has SA=∅. Let p∈SA; by assumption there exists a prime ideal of B lying over p. Then one has ρ−1(pB)=p (II, § 2, no. 5, cor. 3 to prop. 11), and
dim(A/p)=dim(B/pB)=dimA(B/pB)
by th. 1, b) and c) of § 2, no. 3. Consequently, one has
dimA(B)≥dimA(B/pB)=dim(A/p)=dim(A)≥dimA(B).
This implies SA⊂SB and dim(A)=dimA(B). Conversely, if p∈SB, one has the inequalities
dimA(B/pB)=dimA(B)=dim(A)≥dim(A/p)≥dimA(B/pB),
whence p∈SA and SB=SA. By prop. 3 of no. 1 and its corollary, one has
eqA(A)=p∈SA∑eqA(A/p)andeqA(B)=p∈SB∑longAp(Ap⊗AB)eqA(A/p);
by Lemma 1, one has longAp(Ap⊗AB)=1 for every p∈SA, whence eqA(A)=eqA(B).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.