Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 0CSP, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CSP].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VIII, § 7. Multiplicités

Suppose that AA is semi-local; let qq be an ideal of definition of AA, and let ρ:A→B\rho : A \to B be a ring homomorphism making BB into a finitely generated AA-module. Suppose that, for every prime ideal (necessarily minimal) pp of AA such that dim⁡(A/p)=dim⁡(A)\dim(A/p) = \dim(A), there exists a unique prime ideal rr of BB lying over pp and that the canonical homomorphism ρp:Ap→Br\rho_p : A_p \to B_r is bijective. Then one has dim⁡A(B)=dim⁡(A)\dim_A(B) = \dim(A) and eqA(B)=eqA(A)e_q^A(B) = e_q^A(A).

Let SA\mathfrak{S}_A (resp. SB\mathfrak{S}_B) be the set of prime ideals pp of AA such that

dim⁡(A/p)=dim⁡(A)(resp. dim⁡A(B/pB)=dim⁡A(B)); \dim(A/p) = \dim(A) \quad (\text{resp. } \dim_A(B/pB) = \dim_A(B));

one has SA≠∅\mathfrak{S}_A \neq \varnothing. Let p∈SAp \in \mathfrak{S}_A; by assumption there exists a prime ideal of BB lying over pp. Then one has ρ−1(pB)=p\rho^{-1}(pB) = p (II, § 2, no. 5, cor. 3 to prop. 11), and

dim⁡(A/p)=dim⁡(B/pB)=dim⁡A(B/pB) \dim(A/p) = \dim(B/pB) = \dim_A(B/pB)

by th. 1, b) and c) of § 2, no. 3. Consequently, one has

dim⁡A(B)≥dim⁡A(B/pB)=dim⁡(A/p)=dim⁡(A)≥dim⁡A(B). \dim_A(B) \geq \dim_A(B/pB) = \dim(A/p) = \dim(A) \geq \dim_A(B).

This implies SA⊂SB\mathfrak{S}_A \subset \mathfrak{S}_B and dim⁡(A)=dim⁡A(B)\dim(A) = \dim_A(B). Conversely, if p∈SBp \in \mathfrak{S}_B, one has the inequalities

dim⁡A(B/pB)=dim⁡A(B)=dim⁡(A)≥dim⁡(A/p)≥dim⁡A(B/pB), \dim_A(B/pB) = \dim_A(B) = \dim(A) \geq \dim(A/p) \geq \dim_A(B/pB),

whence p∈SAp \in \mathfrak{S}_A and SB=SA\mathfrak{S}_B = \mathfrak{S}_A. By prop. 3 of no. 1 and its corollary, one has

eqA(A)=∑p∈SAeqA(A/p)andeqA(B)=∑p∈SBlong⁡Ap(Ap⊗AB)eqA(A/p); e_q^A(A) = \sum_{p \in \mathfrak{S}_A} e_q^A(A/p) \quad \text{and} \quad e_q^A(B) = \sum_{p \in \mathfrak{S}_B} \operatorname{long}_{A_p}(A_p \otimes_A B) e_q^A(A/p);

by Lemma 1, one has long⁡Ap(Ap⊗AB)=1\operatorname{long}_{A_p}(A_p \otimes_A B) = 1 for every p∈SAp \in \mathfrak{S}_A, whence eqA(A)=eqA(B)e_q^A(A) = e_q^A(B).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.