Bourbaki

Lemma 3

Tag 0CSW, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CSW].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VIII, § 7. Multiplicités

Let RR be a noetherian graded ring with degrees ≥0\geq 0, EE a graded RR-module of finite type such that EnE_n is an R0R_0-module of finite length for every n∈Zn \in \mathbf{Z}. The following conditions are equivalent: (i) EE is an RR-module of finite length; (ii) there exists an integer n0n_0 such that En=0E_n = 0 for n≥n0n \geq n_0; (iii) every prime ideal of RR associated with EE contains R+=⨁n≥1RnR_+ = \bigoplus_{n \geq 1} R_n.

(i) ⇔ (ii): this is clear. (iii) ⇒ (i): let pp be a prime ideal associated with E. If (iii) is satisfied, one has p=p0+R+p = p_0 + R_+ where p0p_0 is a prime ideal of R0R_0, and the R-module R/pR/p is isomorphic to R0/p0R_0/p_0. By IV, § 3, No. 1, corollary of Prop. 1, the R0R_0-module R0/p0R_0/p_0 is isomorphic to a submodule of one of the EkE_k, hence is of finite length. Consequently, R/pR/p is of finite length. By IV, § 2, No. 5, Prop. 7, pp is therefore maximal. In view of the arbitrariness of pp, the R-module E is of finite length (loc. cit.). (i) ⇒ (iii): let pp be a prime ideal associated with E. Then pp is graded (IV, § 3, No. 1, Prop. 1) and maximal (IV, § 2, No. 5, Prop. 7), hence contains R+R_+ (§ 6, No. 2, Lemma 1).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.