Bourbaki

Remark 1

Tag 0CSZ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CSZ].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VIII, § 7. Multiplicités

Let δ\delta be an integer >0> 0. One sometimes says that an element x of A is superficial of order δ\delta for M relative to q if x∈qδx \in q^\delta, and if, for all nn sufficiently large, the mapping qnM/qn+1M→qn+δM/qn+δ+1Mq^n M/q^{n+1} M \to q^{n+\delta} M/q^{n+\delta+1} M induced by multiplication by x is injective. With this terminology, the superficial elements in the sense of Def. 2 are the superficial elements of order 1. 2) With the notation of Prop. 9, x is superficial of order δ\delta if and only if its class ξ\xi in grδ(A)\mathrm{gr}_\delta(A) does not belong to any of the pip_i. 3) By III, § 1, No. 4, Prop. 8, there exists a homogeneous element of gr(A)\mathrm{gr}(A) of degree >0> 0 which does not belong to any of the pip_i. Consequently, there exist an integer δ>0\delta > 0 and a superficial element of order δ\delta for M. 4) Suppose A local with residue field k, and consider the canonical surjective mapping λ:q→q⊗Ak\lambda : q \to q \otimes_A k. It is the composite of the canonical mappings q→q/q2q \to q/q^2 and λˉ:q/q2→q⊗Ak\bar{\lambda} : q/q^2 \to q \otimes_A k. By Nakayama's lemma, each of the vector subspaces Vi=λˉ(pi∩(q/q2))V_i = \bar{\lambda}(p_i \cap (q/q^2)) of q⊗Akq \otimes_A k is distinct from q⊗Akq \otimes_A k; if α∈q⊗Ak\alpha \in q \otimes_A k does not belong to any of the ViV_i, then λ−1(α)\lambda^{-1}(\alpha) consists of superficial elements for M (Prop. 9). If k is infinite, the union of the ViV_i is distinct from q⊗Akq \otimes_A k and there therefore exist superficial elements for M.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.