Bourbaki

Theorem 1

Tag 0CT3, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CT3].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VIII, § 7. Multiplicités

Let AA be a noetherian ring, qq an ideal of AA contained in the radical of AA and MM a finitely generated AA-module such that M/qMM/qM is of finite length. Let x1,...,xmx_1, ..., x_m be a finite sequence of elements of qq. Put x=Ax1+⋯+Axm⊂qx = Ax_1 + \cdots + Ax_m \subset q.

a) One has dim⁡A(M/xM)≥dim⁡A(M)−m\dim_A(M/xM) \geq \dim_A(M) - m.

b) If dim⁡A(M/xM)=dim⁡A(M)−m\dim_A(M/xM) = \dim_A(M) - m, then eq(M/xM)≥eq(M)e_q(M/xM) \geq e_q(M).

c) If m<dim⁡A(M)m < \dim_A(M), and if for i=1,...,mi = 1, ..., m, the element xix_i of AA is superficial for M/(x1M+⋯+xi−1M)M/(x_1M + \cdots + x_{i-1}M) relative to qq, then one has

dim⁡A(M/xM)=dim⁡A(M)−mandeq(M/xM)=eq(M). \dim_A(M/xM) = \dim_A(M) - m \quad \text{and} \quad e_q(M/xM) = e_q(M) .

d) If m=dim⁡A(M)m = \dim_A(M), and if, for i=1,...,mi = 1, ..., m, the element xix_i of AA is superficial for M/(x1M+⋯+xi−1M)M/(x_1M + \cdots + x_{i-1}M) relative to qq, then one has

eq(M)=ex(M)≤long⁡(M/xM)<+∞. e_q(M) = e_x(M) \leq \operatorname{long}(M/xM) < + \infty .

Parts a),b),a), b), and c) follow, for m=1m = 1, from Prop. 8, and the general case is deduced by induction. Suppose the hypotheses of d) are satisfied and set x′=Ax1+⋯+Axm−1x' = Ax_1 + \cdots + Ax_{m-1} and M′=M/x′MM' = M/x'M, so that M/xMM/xM is identified with M′/xmM′M'/x_mM'. Then, by c), one has dim⁡A(M′)=1\dim_A(M') = 1 and eq(M)=eq(M′)e_q(M) = e_q(M'). By Prop. 8, M/xMM/xM is of finite length and one has eq(M′)=exmA(M′)≤long⁡(M/xM)e_q(M') = e_{x_mA}(M') \leq \operatorname{long}(M/xM). But, since xmnM′=xnM′x_m^nM' = x^nM' for every nn, one has exmA(M′)=ex(M′)e_{x_mA}(M') = e_x(M'). On the other hand, one has ex(M′)≥ex(M)e_x(M') \geq e_x(M): this follows from b), where mm is replaced by m−1m - 1, xx by x′x', and qq by xx. Consequently, one has

ex(M)≤ex(M′)=exmA(M′)=eq(M′)=eq(M). e_x(M) \leq e_x(M') = e_{x_mA}(M') = e_q(M') = e_q(M) .

Since xx is contained in qq, this implies ex(M)=eq(M)e_x(M) = e_q(M) (No. 1, Remark 1), and completes the proof.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.