If x and y are two elements of A congruent modulo Jm, one has
xpn≡ypnmodJm+n. By induction on n, one reduces to the case where
n=1. Let P denote the polynomial
∑i=0p−1XiYp−1−i of
Z[X,Y]. In view of the assumption made on x and y, one has
P(x,y)≡P(x,x)≡p.xp−1modJm. Now one has
Jm+p.A⊂J1, whence
P(x,y)∈J1. Finally,
xp−yp=(x−y)P(x,y) belongs to
JmJ1⊂Jm+1.
Let us prove a) by induction on n. The case n=0 is immediate. Suppose n⩾1. Under the hypotheses of a), one has (4) aip≡bipmodJm+1 for 0⩽i⩽n−1 according to Lemma 1 , (5) Φn−1(a0p,...,an−1p)≡Φn−1(b0p,...,bn−1p)modJm+n according to the induction hypothesis applied to the elements a0p,...,an−1p,b0p,...,bn−1p of A, and (6) Φn(a0,...,an)−pn.an≡Φn(b0,...,bn)−pn.bnmodJm+n according to formulas (2) and (5). Since an−bn belongs to Jm, the element pn.an−pn.bn belongs to Jm+n and one deduces from (6) the congruence
Φn(a0,...,an)≡Φn(b0,...,bn)modJm+n, whence a).
Let us prove b) by induction on n. The case n=0 is immediate. Suppose n⩾1. Under the assumptions of b), we have ai≡bimodJm for 0⩽i⩽n−1 by the induction hypothesis, and we deduce from this, as previously, the congruences (4), (5) and (6). But by assumption Φn(a0,...,an) and Φn(b0,...,bn) are congruent mod. Jm+n, and hence we have pn.(an−bn)∈Jm+n. Since the relation p.x∈Jk+1 implies x∈Jk for every x∈A and every k⩾1, we have an−bn∈Jm, which completes the proof.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.