Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 0CTX, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CTX].

Commutative Algebra, chapter IX, § 1. Vecteurs de Witt

Let A\mathbf{A} be a ring endowed with an endomorphism σ\sigma satisfying σ(a)≡apmod  .p⋅A\sigma(a) \equiv a^p \mod. p \cdot \mathbf{A} for every a∈Aa \in \mathbf{A}. Let n⩾1n \geqslant 1 be an integer and let a0,...,an−1a_0, ..., a_{n-1} be elements of A\mathbf{A}. Put ui=Φi(a0,...,ai)u_i = \Phi_i(a_0, ..., a_i) for 0⩽i⩽n−10 \leqslant i \leqslant n - 1. Let unu_n be an element of A\mathbf{A}. The following conditions are equivalent:

a) There exists an∈Aa_n \in \mathbf{A} such that un=Φn(a0,...,an)u_n = \Phi_n(a_0, ..., a_n).

b) One has σ(un−1)≡unmod  .pn⋅A\sigma(u_{n-1}) \equiv u_n \mod. p^n \cdot \mathbf{A}.

For 0⩽i⩽n−10 \leqslant i \leqslant n - 1, one has σ(ai)≡aipmod  .p⋅A\sigma(a_i) \equiv a_i^p \mod. p \cdot \mathbf{A}. According to prop. 1 of no. 1 applied to the case where Jk=pk⋅AJ_k = p^k \cdot \mathbf{A} (for k∈Nk \in \mathbf{N}) and where m=1m = 1, one has the congruence

Φn−1(σ(a0),...,σ(an−1))≡Φn−1(a0p,...,an−1p)mod  .pn⋅A, \Phi_{n-1}(\sigma(a_0), ..., \sigma(a_{n-1})) \equiv \Phi_{n-1}(a_0^p, ..., a_{n-1}^p) \mod. p^n \cdot \mathbf{A},

that is to say

σ(un−1)≡Φn−1(a0p,...,an−1p)mod  .pn⋅A. \sigma(u_{n-1}) \equiv \Phi_{n-1}(a_0^p, ..., a_{n-1}^p) \mod. p^n \cdot \mathbf{A}.

Now, according to formula (2), the relation un=Φn(a0,...,an)u_n = \Phi_n(a_0, ..., a_n) is equivalent to

un=Φn−1(a0p,...,an−1p)+pn⋅an. u_n = \Phi_{n-1}(a_0^p, ..., a_{n-1}^p) + p^n \cdot a_n.

The lemma follows.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.