Let A be a ring. a) The mapping FA is an endomorphism of the ring W(A). b) The mapping VA is an endomorphism of the additive group underlying the ring W(A). c) For every a in W(A), one has FA(VA(a))=p.a (sum in W(A) of p terms equal to a). d) Whatever a and b in W(A) may be, one has
(30)VA(a×FA(b))=VA(a)×b (31)VA(a)×VA(b)=p.VA(a×b) (sum in
W(A) of
p terms equal to
VA(a×b)). e)
Put μ=VA(1)=(0,1,0,...). For every b in W(A), one has (32)VA(FA(b))=μ×b.
1 The letter F is the initial of the name Frobenius, and the letter V that of the German word Verschiebung.
f) For every element a of W(A) denote by a∗p the product in W(A) of p elements equal to a. Then one has
(33)FA(a)≡a∗pmod.p.W(A)(ideal of W(A) generated by p.1).
Let ρ:B→A be a homomorphism of rings satisfying the conditions of Lemma 3 of No. 4. Then W(ρ):W(B)→W(A) is a surjective homomorphism of rings, and ΦB:W(B)→BN is an injective homomorphism of rings. Moreover, fB:BN→BN is a homomorphism of rings. According to the formulas (26) and (28), one has
ΦB∘FB=fB∘ΦB,W(ρ)∘FB=FA∘W(ρ),
whence immediately assertion a. Assertion b follows in an analogous manner from the formulas (27) and (29) and from the fact that vB is an endomorphism of the additive group underlying BN.
Let a be an element of W(A), and choose an element x of W(B) which W(ρ) maps onto a. Put ξ=ΦB(x). It follows immediately from the definitions of fB and vB that one has fB(vB(ξ))=p.ξ (sum in BN of p terms equal to ξ). According to formulas (26) and (27) (where A is replaced by B), the elements FB(VB(x)) and p.x of W(B) therefore have the same image p.ξ by the injective mapping ΦB, and hence are equal. The formula FA(VA(a))=p.a then follows from relations (28) and (29). This proves c.
Reasoning in an analogous manner, we reduce the proof of formula (30) to that of the relation
vB(ξfB(η))=vB(ξ)η
for ξ,η in BN. Now this results from the equalities
ξfB(η)=(ξ0η1,ξ1η2,...)
vB(ξ)η=(0,pξ0η1,pξ1η2,...)
Taking into account b and c, formula (31) results from formula (30), where b is replaced by VA(b). Formula (32) is the particular case a=1 of formula (30).
In an analogous manner, we reduce the proof of formula (33) to that of the relation
fB(ξ)≡ξpmod.p.ΦB(BN),
where ξp denotes the product in BN of p elements equal to ξ. By Prop. 2, c) of No. 2, this is equivalent to the fact that for every n⩾0, one has
σ(ξn+1−ξnp)≡ξn+2−ξn+1pmod.pn+2B.
Now, for every n⩾0, one has, by loc. cit.,
σ(ξn)≡ξn+1mod.pn+1B
since ξ=ΦB(x); one deduces from this, thanks to Lemma 1 of No. 1,
σ(ξn)p≡ξn+1pmod.pn+2B.
This proves the desired relation.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.