Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 0CU9, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CU9].

Commutative Algebra, chapter IX, § 1. Vecteurs de Witt

Let A be a ring. a) The mapping FAF_A is an endomorphism of the ring W(A)W(A). b) The mapping VAV_A is an endomorphism of the additive group underlying the ring W(A)W(A). c) For every aa in W(A)W(A), one has FA(VA(a))=p.aF_A(V_A(a)) = p.a (sum in W(A)W(A) of pp terms equal to aa). d) Whatever aa and bb in W(A)W(A) may be, one has

(30)VA(a×FA(b))=VA(a)×b (30) \quad V_A(a \times F_A(b)) = V_A(a) \times b
(31)VA(a)×VA(b)=p.VA(a×b) (31) \quad V_A(a) \times V_A(b) = p.V_A(a \times b)
(sum in W(A)W(A) of pp terms equal to VA(a×b)V_A(a \times b)). e) Put μ=VA(1)=(0,1,0,...)\mu = V_A(1) = (0, 1, 0, ...). For every bb in W(A)W(A), one has
(32)VA(FA(b))=μ×b. (32) \quad V_A(F_A(b)) = \mu \times b .

1^1 The letter FF is the initial of the name Frobenius, and the letter VV that of the German word Verschiebung.

f) For every element aa of W(A)W(A) denote by a∗pa^{*p} the product in W(A)W(A) of pp elements equal to aa. Then one has

(33)FA(a)≡a∗pmod  .p.W(A)(ideal of W(A) generated by p.1). (33) \quad F_A(a) \equiv a^{*p} \mod. p.W(A) \quad (\text{ideal of } W(A) \text{ generated by } p.\mathbf{1}) .

Let ρ:B→A\rho : B \to A be a homomorphism of rings satisfying the conditions of Lemma 3 of No. 4. Then W(ρ):W(B)→W(A)W(\rho) : W(B) \to W(A) is a surjective homomorphism of rings, and ΦB:W(B)→BN\Phi_B : W(B) \to B^N is an injective homomorphism of rings. Moreover, fB:BN→BNf_B : B^N \to B^N is a homomorphism of rings. According to the formulas (26) and (28), one has

ΦB∘FB=fB∘ΦB,W(ρ)∘FB=FA∘W(ρ), \Phi_B \circ F_B = f_B \circ \Phi_B, \quad W(\rho) \circ F_B = F_A \circ W(\rho),

whence immediately assertion aa. Assertion bb follows in an analogous manner from the formulas (27) and (29) and from the fact that vBv_B is an endomorphism of the additive group underlying BNB^N.

Let aa be an element of W(A)W(A), and choose an element xx of W(B)W(B) which W(ρ)W(\rho) maps onto aa. Put ξ=ΦB(x)\xi = \Phi_B(x). It follows immediately from the definitions of fBf_B and vBv_B that one has fB(vB(ξ))=p.ξf_B(v_B(\xi)) = p.\xi (sum in BNB^N of pp terms equal to ξ\xi). According to formulas (26) and (27) (where A is replaced by B), the elements FB(VB(x))F_B(V_B(x)) and p.xp.x of W(B)W(B) therefore have the same image p.ξp.\xi by the injective mapping ΦB\Phi_B, and hence are equal. The formula FA(VA(a))=p.aF_A(V_A(a)) = p.a then follows from relations (28) and (29). This proves cc.

Reasoning in an analogous manner, we reduce the proof of formula (30) to that of the relation

vB(ξfB(η))=vB(ξ)η v_B(\xi f_B(\eta)) = v_B(\xi) \eta

for ξ,η\xi, \eta in BNB^N. Now this results from the equalities

ξfB(η)=(ξ0η1,ξ1η2,...) \xi f_B(\eta) = (\xi_0 \eta_1, \xi_1 \eta_2, ...)
vB(ξ)η=(0,pξ0η1,pξ1η2,...) v_B(\xi) \eta = (0, p\xi_0 \eta_1, p\xi_1 \eta_2, ...)

Taking into account bb and cc, formula (31) results from formula (30), where bb is replaced by VA(b)V_A(b). Formula (32) is the particular case a=1a = 1 of formula (30).

In an analogous manner, we reduce the proof of formula (33) to that of the relation

fB(ξ)≡ξpmod  .p.ΦB(BN), f_B(\xi) \equiv \xi^p \mod. p.\Phi_B(B^N),

where ξp\xi^p denotes the product in BNB^N of pp elements equal to ξ\xi. By Prop. 2, c) of No. 2, this is equivalent to the fact that for every n⩾0n \geqslant 0, one has

σ(ξn+1−ξnp)≡ξn+2−ξn+1pmod  .pn+2B. \sigma(\xi_{n+1} - \xi_n^p) \equiv \xi_{n+2} - \xi_{n+1}^p \mod. p^{n+2}B .

Now, for every n⩾0n \geqslant 0, one has, by loc. cit.,

σ(ξn)≡ξn+1mod  .pn+1B \sigma(\xi_n) \equiv \xi_{n+1} \mod. p^{n+1}B

since ξ=ΦB(x)\xi = \Phi_B(x); one deduces from this, thanks to Lemma 1 of No. 1,

σ(ξn)p≡ξn+1pmod  .pn+2B. \sigma(\xi_n)^p \equiv \xi_{n+1}^p \mod. p^{n+2}\mathbf{B}.

This proves the desired relation.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.