Bourbaki

Lemma 4

Tag 0CUB, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CUB].

Commutative Algebra, chapter IX, § 1. Vecteurs de Witt

Let A be a ring and m ⩾1\geqslant 1 an integer. One has

(34)

a=(a0,...,am−1,0,...)+(0,...,0⏟m terms,am,am+1,...) a = (a_0, ..., a_{m-1}, 0, ...) + (\underbrace{0, ..., 0}_{m \text{ terms}}, a_m, a_{m+1}, ...)
for every aa in W(A).

Let ρ:B→A\rho : B \to A be a ring homomorphism satisfying the conditions of Lemma 3 of No. 4. Then W(ρ):W(B)→W(A)W(\rho) : W(B) \to W(A) is a surjective homomorphism of rings, and ΦB:W(B)→BN\Phi_B : W(B) \to B^N is an injective homomorphism. It is therefore enough to prove that one has

(35)

Φn(b)=Φn(b0,...,bm−1,0,...)+Φn(0,...,0,bm,bm+1,...) \Phi_n(b) = \Phi_n(b_0, ..., b_{m-1}, 0, ...) + \Phi_n(0, ..., 0, b_m, b_{m+1}, ...)
whatever bb in W(B) and the integers m⩾1,n⩾0m \geqslant 1, n \geqslant 0 may be. Now one has

Φn(b0,...,bm−1,...)=Φn(b0,...,bn)if0⩽n<m \Phi_n(b_0, ..., b_{m-1}, ...) = \Phi_n(b_0, ..., b_n) \quad \text{if} \quad 0 \leqslant n < m
=∑i=0m−1pi⋅bipn−iifm⩽n = \sum_{i=0}^{m-1} p^i \cdot b_i^{p^{n-i}} \quad \text{if} \quad m \leqslant n
Φn(0,...,0,bm,bm+1,...)=0if0⩽n<m \Phi_n(0, ..., 0, b_m, b_{m+1}, ...) = 0 \quad \text{if} \quad 0 \leqslant n < m
=∑i=mnpi⋅bipn−iifm⩽n, = \sum_{i=m}^n p^i \cdot b_i^{p^{n-i}} \quad \text{if} \quad m \leqslant n,
whence formula (35).

Soit A a ring. For every integer m⩾0m \geqslant 0, denote by Vm(A)V_m(A) the set of Witt vectors a=(an)n∈Na = (a_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} such that an=0a_n = 0 for 0⩽n<m0 \leqslant n < m. It is the image of the m-th power VmV^m of the mapping VAV_A. The formulas

(36)

Vm(a+b)=Vm(a)+Vm(b) V^m(a + b) = V^m(a) + V^m(b)
(37)
Vm(a)×b=Vm(a×Fm(b)) V^m(a) \times b = V^m(a \times F^m(b))
result from prop. 3 of No. 5 by induction on mm. They imply that Vm(A)V_m(A) is an ideal of W(A).

In what follows, we shall endow W(A)W(A) with the topology T\mathscr{T} associated with the filtration (Vm(A))m∈Z(V_m(A))_{m \in \mathbf{Z}}. Since Vm(A)V_m(A) is an ideal of W(A)W(A) for every m∈Zm \in \mathbf{Z}, the topology T\mathscr{T} is compatible with the ring structure of W(A)W(A) (TG, III, p. 49, example 3). Let a∈W(A)a \in W(A); the sets a+Vm(A)a + V_m(A), where mm runs through N\mathbf{N}, form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of aa for T\mathscr{T}. Now, it follows from lemma 4 that a+Vm(A)a + V_m(A) consists of the Witt vectors bb such that ai=bia_i = b_i for 0≤i<m0 \leq i < m. Consequently, T\mathscr{T} is none other than the product topology on ANA^\mathbf{N} of the discrete topology on each of the factors, and W(A)W(A) is therefore a separated and complete topological ring (TG, II, p. 17, prop. 10 and TG, III, p. 22, prop. 4).

Let us denote by τA\tau_A (or simply τ\tau) the mapping of AA into W(A)W(A) which associates with an element aa of AA (a,0,0,...)(a, 0, 0, ...) . We have Φn(τ(a))=apn\Phi_n(\tau(a)) = a^{p^n} for every n∈Nn \in \mathbf{N}. For every ring homomorphism ρ:B→A\rho : B \to A, we have W(ρ)∘τB=τA∘ρW(\rho) \circ \tau_B = \tau_A \circ \rho.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.