Bourbaki

Proposition 6

Tag 0CUJ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CUJ].

Commutative Algebra, chapter IX, § 1. Vecteurs de Witt

Let AA be a ring.

a) For every integer k⩾1k \geqslant 1, one has (V1(A))k=pk−1⋅V1(A)(V_1(A))^k = p^{k-1} \cdot V_1(A).

b) Suppose that AA is a ring of characteristic pp. On the ring W(A)W(A), the V1(A)V_1(A)-adic topology and the pp-adic topology coincide, and they are finer than the product topology C\mathscr{C} (cf. No. 6). The ring W(A)W(A) is separated and complete for the pp-adic topology.

Let us prove a) by induction on kk. The case k=1k = 1 is evident. Suppose k⩾2k \geqslant 2. By the induction hypothesis, one has V1(A)k−1=pk−2⋅V1(A)V_1(A)^{k-1} = p^{k-2} \cdot V_1(A) and consequently V1(A)k=pk−2⋅(V1(A))2V_1(A)^k = p^{k-2} \cdot (V_1(A))^2. But it follows from prop. 3, d), formula (31), of No. 5 that one has (V1(A))2=p⋅V1(A)(V_1(A))^2 = p \cdot V_1(A), whence a).

Suppose now that AA is of characteristic pp. As one has

p⋅W(A)=VF(W(A))⊂V1(A)(formula (52)), p \cdot W(A) = VF(W(A)) \subset V_1(A) \quad (\text{formula (52)}) ,

one deduces from a) the inclusions pk.W(A)⊂(V1(A))k⊂pk−1.W(A)p^k.W(A) \subset (V_1(A))^k \subset p^{k-1}.W(A), and from the corollary to prop. 5 the inclusion (V1(A))k⊂Vk(A)(V_1(A))^k \subset V_k(A), for every integer k⩾1k \geqslant 1. The first assertion of b) follows.

Let kk be an integer ⩾1\geqslant 1. According to formula (52), the ideal pk.W(A)p^k.W(A) of W(A)W(A) is the set of elements a=(an)n∈Na = (a_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} of W(A)W(A) such that one has an=0a_n = 0 for n<kn < k and an∈Apka_n \in A^{p^k} for n⩾kn \geqslant k. It is therefore closed for the topology G\mathscr{G}. Since W(A)W(A) is separated and complete for the topology G\mathscr{G} (no 6) and since the ideals pk.W(A)p^k.W(A) of W(A)W(A), for k⩾1k \geqslant 1, form a basis of neighbourhoods of 00 in W(A)W(A) for the pp-adic topology, the ring W(A)W(A) is separated and complete for the pp-adic topology (TG, III, p. 26, cor. 1 to prop. 10).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.