Let A be a noetherian ring, N an A-module, n an integer ⩾0. The following conditions are equivalent:
(i) one has diA(N)<n ; (ii) for every prime ideal p of A, one has ExtAn(A/p,N)=0 ; (iii) for every prime ideal p of A, one has ExtApn(κ(p),Np)=0.
If moreover the A-module N is of finite type, these conditions are equivalent to:
(iv) for every maximal ideal m of A, one has ExtAi(A/m,N)=0 for n⩽i⩽n+ht(m).
Observe that condition (iii) is equivalent to
(iii') for every prime ideal p of A, one has ExtAn(A/p,N)⊗Aκ(p)=0.
In fact, since ExtAn(A/p,N) is annihilated by p, the A-module ExtAn(A/p,N)⊗Aκ(p) is isomorphic to ExtAn(A/p,N)⊗AAp, hence to ExtApn(κ(p),Np) (No. 2, Proposition 2).
The implications (i) ⇒ (ii) and (i) ⇒ (iv) result from Proposition 1 of No. 1, and the implication (ii) ⇒ (iii') is clear.
(iii) ⇒ (i): for every A-module M, let us put T(M)=ExtAn(M,N). Suppose that (i) is not satisfied. Then there exists (No. 1, Proposition 1) an ideal a of A such that T(A/a)=0. Let p be an ideal of A maximal among the ideals having this property; let us prove that p is prime. By IV, § 1, No. 4, Theorem 1 and Theorem 2, there exists a composition sequence (Mi)0⩽i⩽m of A/p such that each quotient Mi/Mi+1 is isomorphic to a module A/pi, where pi (0⩽i⩽m−1) is a prime ideal containing p. If T(A/pi) were zero for every i, one would deduce by induction on i from the exact sequences
T(M0/Mi)⟶T(M0/Mi+1)⟶T(Mi/Mi+1)
that T(M0/Mm)=T(A/p) is zero, which is not so. There therefore exists an index i such that T(A/pi)=0. In view of the maximal character of p, one has p=pi, so that p is prime.
Let x be an element of A−p; from the exact sequence
0→A/pxA/pA/p→A/(p+xA)→0
one deduces an exact sequence
T(A/(p+xA))⟶T(A/p)uT(A/p),
where u=ExtAn(xA,1N)=xT(A/p) (A, X, p. 89, Proposition 6). Because of the maximal character of p, one has T(A/(p+xA))=0, so that the homomorphism u is injective. The nonzero A/p-module T(A/p) is therefore torsion-free. This implies that T(A/p)⊗Aκ(p) is nonzero (A, II, p. 117, Corollary 1), which contradicts (iii').
Suppose that the A-module N is of finite type, and let us prove that (iv) implies (iii). Let p be a prime ideal of A and m a maximal ideal of A containing p. There exists a saturated chain of prime ideals of A with end terms p and m. The length r of this chain is less than ht(m); under assumption (iv), one therefore has
ExtAmn+r(κ(m),Nm)=ExtAn+r(A/m,N)⊗AAm=0.
It then follows from Lemma 3 of § 1, No. 7 that one has ExtApn(κ(p),Np)=0, which proves (iii).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.