Bourbaki

Corollary 4

Tag 0D4N, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0D4N].

Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 3. Profondeur et dimension homologique

Let AA be a noetherian Macaulay ring and MM a finitely generated AA-module of finite projective dimension.

a) Let p∈Spec⁡(A)p \in \operatorname{Spec}(A); let us denote by C(p)\mathscr{C}(p) the set of irreducible components of Supp⁡(M)\operatorname{Supp}(M) containing pp. We have

dim⁡Ap(Mp)−prof⁡Ap(Mp)=dpAp(Mp)−inf⁡X∈C(p)codim⁡(X,Spec⁡(A)). \dim_{A_p}(M_p) - \operatorname{prof}_{A_p}(M_p) = dp_{A_p}(M_p) - \inf_{X \in \mathscr{C}(p)} \operatorname{codim}(X, \operatorname{Spec}(A)) .

b) The mapping p↦dim⁡Ap(Mp)−prof⁡Ap(Mp)p \mapsto \dim_{A_p}(M_p) - \operatorname{prof}_{A_p}(M_p) of Spec⁡(A)\operatorname{Spec}(A) into Z‾\overline{\mathbf{Z}} is upper semi-continuous.

c) The set of prime ideals pp of AA such that the ApA_p-module MpM_p is Macaulay is open and dense in Spec⁡(A)\operatorname{Spec}(A). Its intersection with Supp⁡(M)\operatorname{Supp}(M) is dense in Supp⁡(M)\operatorname{Supp}(M).

a) We may suppose that p∈Supp⁡(M)p \in \operatorname{Supp}(M). Put φ(p)=dim⁡(Ap)−dim⁡Ap(Mp)\varphi(p) = \dim(A_p) - \dim_{A_p}(M_p). By cor. 2 above, we have

dim⁡Ap(Mp)−prof⁡Ap(Mp)=dpAp(Mp)−φ(p). \dim_{A_p}(M_p) - \operatorname{prof}_{A_p}(M_p) = dp_{A_p}(M_p) - \varphi(p) .

Since AA is a Macaulay ring, we have

dim⁡(Ap)=codim⁡(V(p),Spec⁡(A))=codim⁡(V(p),X)+codim⁡(X,Spec⁡(A)) \dim(A_p) = \operatorname{codim}(V(p), \operatorname{Spec}(A)) = \operatorname{codim}(V(p), X) + \operatorname{codim}(X, \operatorname{Spec}(A))
dim⁡Ap(Mp)=codim⁡(V(p),Supp⁡(M))=sup⁡X∈C(p)codim⁡(V(p),X) \dim_{A_p}(M_p) = \operatorname{codim}(V(p), \operatorname{Supp}(M)) = \sup_{X \in \mathscr{C}(p)} \operatorname{codim}(V(p), X)

and consequently

φ(p)=inf⁡X∈C(p)codim⁡(X,Spec⁡(A)). \varphi(p) = \inf_{X \in \mathscr{C}(p)} \operatorname{codim}(X, \operatorname{Spec}(A)) .

b) Let p∈Spec⁡(A)p \in \operatorname{Spec}(A), and let FF be the union of the irreducible components of Supp⁡(M)\operatorname{Supp}(M) which do not contain pp. For every element qq of Spec⁡(A)−F\operatorname{Spec}(A) - F, we have C(q)⊂C(p)\mathscr{C}(q) \subset \mathscr{C}(p), whence φ(q)≥φ(p)\varphi(q) \geq \varphi(p) by the formula above. Consequently the function φ\varphi is lower semi-continuous; assertion b) then follows from prop. 3 of No. 2.

c) Let UU be the set of elements pp of Spec⁡(A)\operatorname{Spec}(A) such that MpM_p is Cohen-Macaulay. The condition p∈Up \in U is equivalent to dim⁡(Mp)−prof⁡(Mp)≤0\dim(M_p) - \operatorname{prof}(M_p) \leq 0, so that UU is open by b). Since UU contains Spec⁡(A)−Supp⁡(M)\operatorname{Spec}(A) - \operatorname{Supp}(M), it is enough to prove that U∩Supp⁡(M)U \cap \operatorname{Supp}(M) is dense in Supp⁡(M)\operatorname{Supp}(M). For every minimal prime ideal pp of Supp⁡(M)\operatorname{Supp}(M), the ApA_p-module MpM_p is of finite length (IV, § 2, No. 5, Corollary 2 of Proposition 7 and § 1, No. 3, Corollary 1 of Proposition 7), hence Cohen-Macaulay; consequently UU meets all the irreducible components of Supp⁡(M)\operatorname{Supp}(M). One concludes by means of Proposition 1 of II, § 4, No. 1.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.