Bourbaki

Theorem 2 (Bass)

Tag 0D4Z, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0D4Z].

Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 3. Profondeur et dimension homologique

Let AA be a noetherian local ring; put d=dim⁡(A)d = \dim(A). Let x=(x1,…,xd)x = (x_1, \ldots, x_d) be a maximal secant sequence of elements of mAm_A, and xx the ideal which it generates. The following conditions are equivalent:

(i) AA is a Gorenstein ring; (ii) one has di⁡A(A)=d\operatorname{di}_A(A) = d; (iii) there exists an integer i>di > d such that Ext⁡Ai(κA,A)=0\operatorname{Ext}^i_A(\kappa_A, A) = 0; (iv) one has Ext⁡Ai(κA,A)=0\operatorname{Ext}^i_A(\kappa_A, A) = 0 for i<di < d and the κA\kappa_A-vector space Ext⁡Ad(κA,A)\operatorname{Ext}^d_A(\kappa_A, A) is of dimension 1; (v) the ring AA is Macaulay and the κA\kappa_A-vector space Hom⁡A(κA,A/x)\operatorname{Hom}_A(\kappa_A, A/x) is of dimension 1; (vi) the sequence xx is AA-regular and the κA\kappa_A-vector space Hom⁡A(κA,A/x)\operatorname{Hom}_A(\kappa_A, A/x) is of dimension 1.

The equivalence of (i), (ii) and (iii) follows from Lemma 2 and Prop. 10. If Ext⁡Ai(κA,A)\operatorname{Ext}^i_A(\kappa_A, A) is zero for every integer i<di < d, the ring AA is Macaulay (§ 2, No. 3, Prop. 3); if the ring AA is Macaulay, the sequence xx is AA-regular (loc. cit., Th. 1); if the sequence xx is AA-regular, one has Ext⁡Ai(κA,A)=0\operatorname{Ext}^i_A(\kappa_A, A) = 0 for i<di < d and the κA\kappa_A-vector spaces Ext⁡Ad(κA,A)\operatorname{Ext}^d_A(\kappa_A, A) and Hom⁡A(κA,A/x)\operatorname{Hom}_A(\kappa_A, A/x) are isomorphic (A, X, p. 166, Prop. 9). This proves the equivalence of conditions (iv), (v) and (vi).

Let us prove that (i) implies (v): if AA is a Gorenstein ring, it is a Macaulay ring (prop. 10). The sequence xx is then AA-regular (§ 2, No. 3, prop. 4), hence A/xA/x is an artinian Gorenstein ring (example 2), so that the κA\kappa_A-vector space Hom⁡A(κA,A/x)\operatorname{Hom}_A(\kappa_A, A/x) is of dimension 1.

Lastly let us prove that (vi) implies (i): under assumption (vi), the ring A/xA/x is a Gorenstein ring (lemma 1), hence AA is a Gorenstein ring (example 3).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.