Proposition 1
Tag 0DAA, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DAA].
Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 8. Dualité des modules de longueur finie
Let be a noetherian ring. For every prime ideal of , let be an injective envelope of (A, X, § 1, No. 9).
a) The -modules are indecomposable.
b) Let be an indecomposable injective -module; the set consists of a single element.
c) The mapping is a bijection of onto . The inverse bijection associates to an element of the unique element of .
Let ; let us prove that the module is indecomposable. By A, X, p. 21, Corollary 2, it is enough to prove that if and are ideals of containing and distinct from , the ideal is distinct from ; now if is an element of and an element of , the product belongs to .
Let be an indecomposable injective -module, and let be elements of . Then contains a submodule isomorphic to and a submodule isomorphic to . One has (A, X, p. 21, Proposition 14); for every nonzero element of , one has . Since is not empty (IV, § 1, No. 1, Corollary 1 of Proposition 2), it consists of a single element .
We have thus defined two mappings from into and from into ; let us prove that these two mappings are reciprocal bijections. Let ; then belongs to , and is therefore the unique element of . Let be an indecomposable injective -module, and the unique element of ; then is an injective envelope of (A, X, p. 21, Prop. 14). This completes the proof of the proposition.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.