Bourbaki

Remark 2

Tag 0DAD, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DAD].

Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 8. Dualité des modules de longueur finie

Let AA be a noetherian ring, MM an AA-module, e:M→Ie : M \to I an injective envelope of MM. The set Ass(M) is equal to Ass(I): in fact, the inclusion Ass(M)⊂Ass(I)Ass(M) \subset Ass(I) is obvious. On the other hand, if pp is an element of Ass(I)Ass(I), II contains a submodule NN isomorphic to A/pA/p; since the AA-module e−1(N)e^{-1}(N) is nonzero, one has Ass(e−1(N))={p}Ass(e^{-1}(N)) = \{p\} (IV, § 1, No. 1, Prop. 1). This proves that pp is associated with e−1(N)e^{-1}(N), hence with MM, whence our assertion.

Let us retain the notation of the theorem, and suppose further that Ass(M)Ass(M) is finite. For every q∈Ass(M)q \in Ass(M), let QqQ_q denote the intersection with MM of ⨁p∈Ass(M)−{q}I(p)(ap)\bigoplus_{p \in Ass(M) - \{q\}} I(p)^{(a_p)}. Then (Qq)q∈Ass(M)(Q_q)_{q \in Ass(M)} is a reduced primary decomposition of 0 in M (IV, § 2, No. 3, Def. 3). For indeed ∩Qq=0\cap Q_q = 0; since M/QqM/Q_q is identified with a nonzero a-submodule of I(q)(aq)I(q)^{(a_q)}, we have Ass(M/Qq)={q}Ass(M/Q_q) = \{q\}, and it is enough to apply Prop. 4 of loc. cit.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.