Proposition 2
Tag 0DAG, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DAG].
Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 8. Dualité des modules de longueur finie
Let be a noetherian ring, an ideal of , an -module and a sub--module of annihilated by . The following conditions are equivalent: (i) is an injective envelope of ; (ii) the -module is an injective envelope of the -module , the module is the union of the and the canonical mapping is bijective.
Suppose condition (i) is satisfied. The -module is injective (Lemma 1, a)), and contains ; since every sub--module of is a sub--module of , is an injective envelope of the -module . By Lemma 1, the union of the is an injective sub--module of containing , hence equal to . Since is injective, for every one has an exact sequence
since is identified with for every and the canonical injection of into is bijective, one deduces that the canonical homomorphism is bijective, whence (ii).
Suppose (ii) is satisfied. Let be an injective envelope of . Since is injective, there exists an -linear mapping extending . But maps into for every , hence induces homomorphisms gr^{a}(\varphi) : \operatorname{gr}^{a}(E) \to \operatorname{gr}^{a}(I) \text{ and } \varphi_1 : E_1 \to I_1 \text{ rendering the diagram commutative}
Since and are injective envelopes of the -module , the homomorphism is bijective; since and are bijective, it follows that is bijective. This implies, by induction on , that induces a bijection of onto for every ; hence is bijective, which entails (i).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.