Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 0DAI, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DAI].

Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 8. Dualité des modules de longueur finie

Let AA be a noetherian ring, pp a prime ideal of AA, and e:A/p→Ie : A/p \to I an injective envelope of the AA-module A/pA/p. For every integer n≥0n \geq 0, let InI_n denote the submodule of II consisting of the elements annihilated by pnp^n.

a) The AA-module II is the union of the InI_n. The injection A/p→I1A / \mathfrak{p} \to I_1 extends to an isomorphism of κ(p)\kappa(\mathfrak{p}) onto I1I_1; let us identify κ(p)\kappa(\mathfrak{p}) with I1I_1 by means of this isomorphism. For each integer n⩾0n \geqslant 0, the structure of A/pA / \mathfrak{p}-module of In+1/InI_{n+1}/I_n arises by restriction of scalars from a unique structure of κ(p)\kappa(\mathfrak{p})-vector space; the canonical homomorphism βI,−n:In+1/In⟶HomA/p(pn/pn+1,κ(p))\beta_{I,-n}: I_{n+1}/I_n \longrightarrow \mathrm{Hom}_{A/\mathfrak{p}}(\mathfrak{p}^n/\mathfrak{p}^{n+1}, \kappa(\mathfrak{p})) is an isomorphism of finite-dimensional κ(p)\kappa(\mathfrak{p})-vector spaces.

b) There exists a unique structure of Ap^\widehat{A_p}-module on II inducing its structure of AA-module. The canonical homomorphism Ap^⟶EndA(I)\widehat{A_p} \longrightarrow \mathrm{End}_A(I) is bijective.

According to A, X, p. 20, Example 1, the A/pA/\mathfrak{p}-module κ(p)\kappa(\mathfrak{p}) is an injective envelope of A/pA/\mathfrak{p}. It therefore follows from Prop. 2 that I1I_1 identifies with κ(p)\kappa(\mathfrak{p}), that II is the union of the ImI_m, and that for each integer n⩾0n \geqslant 0, βI,−n\beta_{I,-n} is an isomorphism of A/pA/\mathfrak{p}-modules. For every nonzero element aa of A/pA/\mathfrak{p}, the homothety of ratio aa is invertible in HomA/p(pn/pn+1,κ(p))\mathrm{Hom}_{A/\mathfrak{p}}(\mathfrak{p}^n/\mathfrak{p}^{n+1}, \kappa(\mathfrak{p})), hence also in In+1/InI_{n+1}/I_n, which completes the proving of a).

Let s∈A−ps \in A - \mathfrak{p}. Since the homothety sA/ps_{A/\mathfrak{p}} is injective, the trace of Ker sI\mathrm{Ker}\, s_I on A/pA/\mathfrak{p} is zero, whence it follows that the homothety sIs_I is injective. Then sIs_I is a direct factor submodule of II (A, X, p. 19, Cor. 4), hence equal to II since II is indecomposable (No. 1, Prop. 1), so that the homothety sIs_I is bijective. There therefore exists a unique ApA_p-module structure on II inducing its AA-module structure; it extends uniquely to a Ap^\widehat{A_p}-module structure (Lemma 2).

For each integer nn, one deduces from the canonical ring homomorphism Ap⟶EndA(I)A_p \longrightarrow \mathrm{End}_A(I) an AA-linear mapping αn:Ap/pnAp⟶HomA(In,I)\alpha_n : A_p/\mathfrak{p}^n A_p \longrightarrow \mathrm{Hom}_A(I_n, I). Consider the commutative diagram with exact rows

0⟶pnAp/pn+1Ap⟶Ap/pn+1Ap⟶Ap/pnAp⟶0↓αn+1′↓αn+1↓αn0⟶HomA(In+1/In,I1)⟶HomA(In+1,I)⟶HomA(In,I)⟶0 \begin{array}{ccccccccc} 0 & \longrightarrow & \mathfrak{p}^n A_p/\mathfrak{p}^{n+1} A_p & \longrightarrow & A_p/\mathfrak{p}^{n+1} A_p & \longrightarrow & A_p/\mathfrak{p}^n A_p & \longrightarrow & 0 \\ & & \downarrow \alpha'_{n+1} & & \downarrow \alpha_{n+1} & & \downarrow \alpha_n & & \\ 0 & \longrightarrow & \mathrm{Hom}_A(I_{n+1}/I_n, I_1) & \longrightarrow & \mathrm{Hom}_A(I_{n+1}, I) & \longrightarrow & \mathrm{Hom}_A(I_n, I) & \longrightarrow & 0 \end{array}

where αn+1′\alpha'_{n+1} is the homomorphism induced by αn+1\alpha_{n+1}. Consider the canonical κ(p)\kappa(\mathfrak{p})-bilinear mapping

αn,−n:pnAp/pn+1Ap×In+1/In⟶I1 \alpha_{n,-n} : \mathfrak{p}^n A_p/\mathfrak{p}^{n+1} A_p \times I_{n+1}/I_n \longrightarrow I_1

(formula (1)). The linear mapping In+1/In⟶Homκ(p)(pnAp/pn+1Ap,I1)I_{n+1}/I_n \longrightarrow \mathrm{Hom}_{\kappa(\mathfrak{p})}(\mathfrak{p}^n A_p/\mathfrak{p}^{n+1} A_p, I_1) associated with it on the left identifies with βI,−n\beta_{I,-n}, and that associated with it on the right is αn+1′\alpha'_{n+1}. Since βI,−n\beta_{I,-n} is bijective by a), the same is true of αn+1′\alpha'_{n+1}; one then deduces from the above diagram, by induction on nn, that αn\alpha_n is an isomorphism for every nn. Since II is the union of the InI_n, the canonical mapping EndA(I)→lim←⁡HomA(In,I)\mathrm{End}_A(I) \to \varprojlim \mathrm{Hom}_A(I_n, I) is bijective; the ring homomorphism Ap^→EndA(I)\widehat{A_p} \to \mathrm{End}_A(I), which identifies with the projective limit of the mappings αn\alpha_n, is therefore bijective.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.