Lemma 3
Tag 0DAM, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DAM].
Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 8. Dualité des modules de longueur finie
Let I be a Matlis A-module. Then:
a) I is a Matlis -module; b) the A-module I is artinian and a cogenerator (A, X, p. 18, def. 3).
Since the A-module I is injective, the A/m_A^n-module I_n is injective for each n (No. 2, lemma 1, a)). As I_n is the set of elements of I annihilated by m_A^n, the -module I is injective (lemma 1, b)). It is indecomposable over since it is so over A; as it contains the sub--module I_1 isomorphic to , we have , hence (prop. 1), whence a).
Let us prove now that I is artinian. To every sub-A-module M of I, let us associate the graded ideal of gr(A) defined as follows: an element of gr(A)_n belongs to if it is annihilated by all the linear forms , where runs through . Let and be submodules of such that ; then . Suppose ; we have for every since is an isomorphism. By induction on we deduce from this that for every , whence finally .
This being so, let be a decreasing sequence of sub-A-modules of ; the increasing sequence is stationary, since is a finitely generated -algebra. The sequence is therefore stationary, which implies that the A-module is artinian. Finally, the A-module is a cogenerator by virtue of A, X, p. 18, prop. 12.
Let be an A-module. Recall (A, VIII, § 4, No. 6) that the socle of is the sum of the simple submodules of , that is to say the set of elements of annihilated by ; it is a -vector space, canonically isomorphic to .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.