Bourbaki

Lemma 3

Tag 0DAM, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DAM].

Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 8. Dualité des modules de longueur finie

Let I be a Matlis A-module. Then:

a) I is a Matlis A^\widehat{A}-module; b) the A-module I is artinian and a cogenerator (A, X, p. 18, def. 3).

Since the A-module I is injective, the A/m_A^n-module I_n is injective for each n (No. 2, lemma 1, a)). As I_n is the set of elements of I annihilated by m_A^n, the A^\widehat{A}-module I is injective (lemma 1, b)). It is indecomposable over A^\widehat{A} since it is so over A; as it contains the sub-A^\widehat{A}-module I_1 isomorphic to κA\kappa_A, we have mA^∈Ass⁡A^(I)m_{\widehat{A}} \in \operatorname{Ass}_{\widehat{A}}(I), hence Ass⁡A^(I)={mA^}\operatorname{Ass}_{\widehat{A}}(I) = \{ m_{\widehat{A}} \} (prop. 1), whence a).

Let us prove now that I is artinian. To every sub-A-module M of I, let us associate the graded ideal aMa_M of gr(A) defined as follows: an element of gr(A)_n belongs to (aM)n(\mathfrak{a}_M)_n if it is annihilated by all the linear forms β(x)\beta(x), where xx runs through ((M∩In+1)+In)/In((M \cap I_{n+1}) + I_n)/I_n. Let MM and NN be submodules of II such that N⊂MN \subset M; then aM⊂aN\mathfrak{a}_M \subset \mathfrak{a}_N. Suppose aM=aN\mathfrak{a}_M = \mathfrak{a}_N; we have (M∩In+1)+In=(N∩In+1)+In(M \cap I_{n+1}) + I_n = (N \cap I_{n+1}) + I_n for every nn since β\beta is an isomorphism. By induction on nn we deduce from this that M∩In+1=N∩In+1M \cap I_{n+1} = N \cap I_{n+1} for every nn, whence finally M=NM = N.

This being so, let M0⊃M1⊃…⊃Mn⊃…M_0 \supset M_1 \supset \ldots \supset M_n \supset \ldots be a decreasing sequence of sub-A-modules of II; the increasing sequence aM0⊂aM1⊂…\mathfrak{a}_{M_0} \subset \mathfrak{a}_{M_1} \subset \ldots is stationary, since gr(A)\mathrm{gr}(A) is a finitely generated κA\kappa_A-algebra. The sequence (Mi)i≥0(M_i)_{i \geq 0} is therefore stationary, which implies that the A-module II is artinian. Finally, the A-module II is a cogenerator by virtue of A, X, p. 18, prop. 12.

Let MM be an A-module. Recall (A, VIII, § 4, No. 6) that the socle of MM is the sum of the simple submodules of MM, that is to say the set of elements of MM annihilated by mAm_A; it is a κA\kappa_A-vector space, canonically isomorphic to HomA(κA,M)\mathrm{Hom}_A(\kappa_A, M).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.