Lemma 4
Tag 0DAN, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DAN].
Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 8. Dualité des modules de longueur finie
Let I be a Matlis A-module and M a -module. The following conditions are equivalent :
(i) is artinian; (ii) every element of is annihilated by a power of , and the socle of is of finite dimension over ; (iii) there exist an integer and an injective a-linear mapping of into .
When these conditions are satisfied, every injective envelope of is isomorphic to , where is the dimension over of the socle of .
(iii) (i): this is clear since the a-module is artinian (Lemma 3).
(i) (ii): suppose that is artinian. Let ; the decreasing sequence of submodules of is stationary. Let be an integer such that ; Nakayama's lemma implies that . On the other hand, the socle of is artinian as an a-module, hence also as a -vector space, which means that it is of finite dimension.
(ii) (iii): suppose condition (ii) satisfied; let be an injective envelope of . We have , hence (No. 1, Remark 2), and is isomorphic to for a cardinal (No. 1, Theorem 1). Let be a nonzero element of annihilated by ; since the a-module is simple and its intersection with is not reduced to 0, belongs to . Thus induces an isomorphism of the socle of onto that of ; consequently the socle of is of dimension , which proves (iii) as well as the last assertion.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.