Proposition 1
Tag 0DCS, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DCS].
Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 10. Cohomologie locale, dualité de Grothendieck
Let be a noetherian local ring and a finitely generated -module.
a) The -module is artinian, and zero in degree .
b) Let . We have for , and if is nonzero.
Let us prove a) by induction on . The case where follows from Example 2 above. Suppose and first take of the form , where is a prime ideal of distinct from . Let be an element of ; we have an exact sequence , with . Hence we deduce an exact sequence of local cohomology
Every element of is annihilated by a power of ; to prove that this module is artinian, it is enough therefore to prove that the socle of is of finite dimension over (§ 8, No. 3, Lemma 3). By the induction hypothesis, the kernel of the homothety of ratio in is artinian; since belongs to , the socle of identifies with that of , and is therefore of finite dimension. If , we have by the induction hypothesis, so that the homothety of ratio is injective in ; since every element of is annihilated by a power of , we deduce that , whence a) in the case considered.
Let us pass to the general case. The -module admits a composition series such that each quotient is isomorphic to , where is a prime ideal of (IV, § 1, No. 4, Theorem 1). Let us prove by induction on that satisfies a). The case is trivial. The exact sequence yields an exact sequence of local cohomology
the -module is artinian by the induction hypothesis, and the same is true of by the cases already treated; consequently is artinian. If , the modules and are of dimension ; the modules and are therefore zero by the induction hypothesis and the cases already treated, which implies that .
Suppose nonzero, and let us prove b) by induction on the integer . The case follows from the definition of depth. Suppose and choose an element of such that the homothety is injective. As above we obtain a local cohomology exact sequence
We have (§ 1, No. 4, prop. 7), whence for by the induction hypothesis, which implies as above that . In particular is zero, so that the homomorphism is injective; thus is nonzero by the induction hypothesis.
It can be shown that the module is nonzero when is nonzero (exerc. 4; cf. No. 3, cor. of th. 2).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.