Bourbaki

Remark 2

Tag 0DCW, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DCW].

Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 10. Cohomologie locale, dualité de Grothendieck

Let

(E)0→M→N→P→0 (\mathscr{E}) \quad 0 \to M \to N \to P \to 0
be an exact sequence of a-modules. Using A, X, p. 104, prop. 3 and p. 106, prop. 4, one proves that the following diagrams are commutative:

Tord−iA(P,HAd(A))→τi(P)HAi(P)↓∂d−i(E,HAd(A))↓∂i(E)Tord−i−1A(M,HAd(A))→τi+1(M)HAi+1(M) \begin{array}{ccc} \mathrm{Tor}_{d-i}^A(P, H_A^d(A)) & \xrightarrow{\tau^i(P)} & H_A^i(P) \\ \downarrow \partial_{d-i}(\mathscr{E}, H_A^d(A)) & & \downarrow \partial^i(\mathscr{E}) \\ \mathrm{Tor}_{d-i-1}^A(M, H_A^d(A)) & \xrightarrow{\tau^{i+1}(M)} & H_A^{i+1}(M) \end{array}

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.