Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 0DK3, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DK3].

Algebra, chapter IX, § 2. Discriminant d'une forme sesquilinéaire

Let Φ\Phi be a sesquilinear form for JJ on EE, (x~1,…,xn)(\tilde{x}_1, \ldots, x_n) a system of nn elements of EE, and (aij)(i,j=1,…,n)(a_{ij})_{(i,j = 1, \ldots, n)} a family of n2n^2 elements of AA; put yi=∑i=1najixiy_i = \sum_{i=1}^n a_{ji}x_i. We then have

DΦ(y1,…,yn)=det⁡(aij)⋅det⁡(aij)j⋅DΦ(x1,…,xn). D_\Phi(y_1, \ldots, y_n) = \det (a_{ij}) \cdot \det (a_{ij})^j \cdot D_\Phi(x_1, \ldots, x_n).

Indeed, since Φ\Phi is a sesquilinear form, we have Φ(yi,yj)=∑k,maikΦ(xk,xm)ajmj\Phi(y_i, y_j) = \sum_{k,m} a_{ik} \Phi(x_k, x_m) a_{jm}^j. Hence, if we denote by AA the matrix (aij)(a_{ij}), the matrix (Φ(yi,yj))(\Phi(y_i, y_j)) is equal to A.(Φ(xi,xj)).tAjA . (\Phi(x_i, x_j)). {}^t A^j. Since det⁡(tA)=det⁡(A)\det({}^t A) = \det(A), and det⁡(Aj)=det⁡(A)j\det(A^j) = \det(A)^j, our assertion is proved.

In particular, if (ei)(e_i) and (ei′)(e'_i) are two bases of E,DE, D and D′D' the discriminants of Φ\Phi with respect to these bases, and aa the determinant of the passing matrix from the basis (ei)(e_i) to the basis (ei′)(e'_i), we have

(4)D′=aajD. (4) \qquad D' = aa^j D.

It follows from prop. 1 that, if (ei)(e_i) is a basis of EE and (xi)(x_i) an arbitrary system of nn elements of EE, DΦ(e1,…,en)D_\Phi(e_1, \ldots, e_n) divides DΦ(x1,…,xn)D_\Phi(x_1, \ldots, x_n). In particular the discriminants of Φ\Phi with respect to any two bases of EE generate the same principal ideal of AA.

Let (Ei)i∈I(E_i)_{i \in I} be a finite family of finite-dimensional free AA-modules, Φi\Phi_i a sesquilinear form for JJ on EiE_i, and BiB_i a basis of EiE_i. If Φ\Phi denotes the direct sum of the Φi\Phi_i (§ 1, no 3) and BB the basis of ∏i∈IEi\prod_{i \in I} E_i obtained by joining the BiB_i, then obviously

(5)DΦ(B)=∏i∈IDΦi(Bi). (5) \qquad D_\Phi(B) = \prod_{i \in I} D_{\Phi_i}(B_i).

Let Φ\Phi be a sesquilinear form for JJ on EE, hh a homomorphism of AA into a commutative ring A′A', Φ′\Phi' the sesquilinear form on A′⊗AEA' \otimes_A E obtained by extension of Φ\Phi (§ 1, no 4) and (x1,…,xn)(x_1, \ldots, x_n) an arbitrary system of elements of EE. Since A′⊗AEA' \otimes_A E is a free A′A'-module, DΦ′(1⊗x1,…,1⊗xn)D_{\Phi'}(1 \otimes x_1, \ldots, 1 \otimes x_n) is defined, and we have obviously

(6)DΦ′(1⊗x1,…,1⊗xn)=h(DΦ(x1,…,xn)). (6) \qquad D_{\Phi'}(1 \otimes x_1, \ldots, 1 \otimes x_n) = h(D_\Phi(x_1, \ldots, x_n)).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.