Bourbaki

Theorem 1

Tag 0DL3, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DL3].

Algebra, chapter IX, § 5. Propriétés spéciales aux formes bilinéaires alternées

Let AA be a (commutative) principal ring, EE a free AA-module of finite dimension nn and Φ\Phi an alternating bilinear form on EE. Then there exists a basis (ei)1≤i≤n(e_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n} of EE and an even integer 2r≤n2r \leq n, such that

1o1^o Φ(e1,e2)=α1,Φ(e3,e4)=α2,…,Φ(e2r−1,e2r)=αr\Phi(e_1, e_2) = \alpha_1, \Phi(e_3, e_4) = \alpha_2, \ldots, \Phi(e_{2r-1}, e_{2r}) = \alpha_r

where the αi\alpha_i are elements ≠0\neq 0 of AA, and where αi\alpha_i divides αi+1\alpha_{i+1} for i=1,…,r−1i = 1, \ldots, r-1.

2o2^o All the other elements Φ(ei,ej)\Phi(e_i, e_j) where i≤ji \leq j are zero.

The ideals AαiA \alpha_i (i=1,…,ri = 1, \ldots, r) are uniquely determined by the preceding conditions. The submodule E0E^0 of EE orthogonal to EE is generated by e2r+1,…,ene_{2r+1}, \ldots, e_n.

We shall proceed by induction on the dimension nn of EE. The theorem is evident for n=0n = 0. If Φ=0\Phi = 0, the theorem is evident also; we may therefore suppose Φ≠0\Phi \neq 0. Let ff be the linear mapping dΦd_\Phi of EE into E∗E^* associated on the right with Φ\Phi (§1§ 1, no 1); then f(E)f(E) is a non-zero submodule of the module E∗E^*, which is a free module of dimension nn. Let Aα1A\alpha_1 be the largest invariant factor of f(E)f(E) with respect to E∗E^* (chap. VII, §4§ 4, no 2, th. 1); we know (loc. cit.) that there exists a basis (e1′,a2′,…,an′)(e'_1, a'_2, \ldots, a'_n) of E∗E^* and an element f(e2)∈f(E)f(e_2) \in f(E) such that f(e2)=α1e1′f(e_2) = \alpha_1 e'_1. Let (e1,a2,…,an)(e_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n) be the basis of EE (identified with the bidual E∗∗E^{**}) dual to (e1′,a2′,…,an′)(e'_1, a'_2, \ldots, a'_n); we have

Φ(e1,e2)=−Φ(e2,e1)=⟨e1,f(e2)⟩=α1. \Phi(e_1, e_2) = -\Phi(e_2, e_1) = \langle e_1, f(e_2) \rangle = \alpha_1.

Let PP be the submodule Ae1+Ae2Ae_1 + Ae_2 of EE. We shall see that EE is direct sum of Ae1,Ae2Ae_1, Ae_2 and the orthogonal submodule P0P^0 of PP. For this, it is enough to prove that, for every x∈Ex \in E, there exist elements ξ1,ξ2\xi_1, \xi_2 of AA, uniquely determined, such that x−ξ1e1−ξ2e2∈P0x - \xi_1 e_1 - \xi_2 e_2 \in P^0, that is to say such that

Φ(e1,x−ξ1e1−ξ2e2)=0,Φ(e2,x−ξ1e1−ξ2e2)=0. \Phi(e_1, x - \xi_1 e_1 - \xi_2 e_2) = 0, \qquad \Phi(e_2, x - \xi_1 e_1 - \xi_2 e_2) = 0.

According to (1) these conditions are written

⟨e1,f(x)⟩=ξ2α1,⟨e2,f(x)⟩=−ξ1α1. \langle e_1, f(x) \rangle = \xi_2 \alpha_1, \langle e_2, f(x) \rangle = -\xi_1 \alpha_1.

But we know (loc. cit.) that the image of f(E)f(E) by every linear form on E∗E^* is contained in the ideal Aα1A\alpha_1, in other words all the values Φ(x,y)=⟨x,f(y)⟩\Phi(x, y) = \langle x, f(y) \rangle belong to Aα1A\alpha_1; hence the existence and uniqueness of ξ1\xi_1 and ξ2\xi_2. Thus P0P^0 is a free module of rank n−2n-2; there exists therefore, in P0P^0, according to the induction hypothesis, a basis (e3,e4,…,en)(e_3, e_4, \ldots, e_n) satisfying the conditions of the statement. To prove that the basis (e1,…,en)(e_1, \ldots, e_n) of EE thus obtained also satisfies these conditions, it is enough to prove that α1\alpha_1 divides α2\alpha_2; now this follows from the fact that all the values Φ(x,y)\Phi(x, y) are multiples of α1\alpha_1. It is then clear that e2r+1,…,ene_{2r+1}, \ldots, e_n generate E0E^0. Finally, if (ei′)(e'_i) is the dual basis of (ei)(e_i), we have f(e2j−1)=−αje2j′f(e_{2j-1}) = -\alpha_j e'_{2j} and f(e2j)=αje2j′f(e_{2j}) = \alpha_j e'_{2j} for j=1,…,rj = 1, \ldots, r and f(ek)=0f(e_k) = 0 for k=2r+1,…,nk = 2r+1, \ldots, n; the ideals Aα1,Aα1,Aα2,Aα2,…,Aαr,AαrA\alpha_1, A\alpha_1, A\alpha_2, A\alpha_2, \ldots, A\alpha_r, A\alpha_r are therefore the invariant factors of f(E)f(E) with respect to E∗E^*, which proves their uniqueness (Chapter VII, §4§ 4, No. 2, Theorem 1).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.