Let A be a (commutative) principal ring, E a free A-module of finite dimension n and Φ an alternating bilinear form on E. Then there exists a basis (ei)1≤i≤n of E and an even integer 2r≤n, such that
1o Φ(e1,e2)=α1,Φ(e3,e4)=α2,…,Φ(e2r−1,e2r)=αr
where the αi are elements =0 of A, and where αi divides αi+1 for i=1,…,r−1.
2o All the other elements Φ(ei,ej) where i≤j are zero.
The ideals Aαi (i=1,…,r) are uniquely determined by the preceding conditions. The submodule E0 of E orthogonal to E is generated by e2r+1,…,en.
We shall proceed by induction on the dimension n of E. The theorem is evident for n=0. If Φ=0, the theorem is evident also; we may therefore suppose Φ=0. Let f be the linear mapping dΦ of E into E∗ associated on the right with Φ (§1, no 1); then f(E) is a non-zero submodule of the module E∗, which is a free module of dimension n. Let Aα1 be the largest invariant factor of f(E) with respect to E∗ (chap. VII, §4, no 2, th. 1); we know (loc. cit.) that there exists a basis (e1′,a2′,…,an′) of E∗ and an element f(e2)∈f(E) such that f(e2)=α1e1′. Let (e1,a2,…,an) be the basis of E (identified with the bidual E∗∗) dual to (e1′,a2′,…,an′); we have
Φ(e1,e2)=−Φ(e2,e1)=⟨e1,f(e2)⟩=α1.
Let P be the submodule Ae1+Ae2 of E. We shall see that E is direct sum of Ae1,Ae2 and the orthogonal submodule P0 of P. For this, it is enough to prove that, for every x∈E, there exist elements ξ1,ξ2 of A, uniquely determined, such that x−ξ1e1−ξ2e2∈P0, that is to say such that
Φ(e1,x−ξ1e1−ξ2e2)=0,Φ(e2,x−ξ1e1−ξ2e2)=0.
According to (1) these conditions are written
⟨e1,f(x)⟩=ξ2α1,⟨e2,f(x)⟩=−ξ1α1.
But we know (loc. cit.) that the image of f(E) by every linear form on E∗ is contained in the ideal Aα1, in other words all the values Φ(x,y)=⟨x,f(y)⟩ belong to Aα1; hence the existence and uniqueness of ξ1 and ξ2. Thus P0 is a free module of rank n−2; there exists therefore, in P0, according to the induction hypothesis, a basis (e3,e4,…,en) satisfying the conditions of the statement. To prove that the basis (e1,…,en) of E thus obtained also satisfies these conditions, it is enough to prove that α1 divides α2; now this follows from the fact that all the values Φ(x,y) are multiples of α1. It is then clear that e2r+1,…,en generate E0. Finally, if (ei′) is the dual basis of (ei), we have f(e2j−1)=−αje2j′ and f(e2j)=αje2j′ for j=1,…,r and f(ek)=0 for k=2r+1,…,n; the ideals Aα1,Aα1,Aα2,Aα2,…,Aαr,Aαr are therefore the invariant factors of f(E) with respect to E∗, which proves their uniqueness (Chapter VII, §4, No. 2, Theorem 1).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.