§ 5. Special Properties of Alternating Bilinear Forms
1. Reduction of Alternating Bilinear Forms.
Theorem 1
Let be a (commutative) principal ring, a free -module of finite dimension and an alternating bilinear form on . Then there exists a basis of and an even integer , such that
where the are elements of , and where divides for .
All the other elements where are zero.
The ideals () are uniquely determined by the preceding conditions. The submodule of orthogonal to is generated by .
We shall proceed by induction on the dimension of . The theorem is evident for . If , the theorem is evident also; we may therefore suppose . Let be the linear mapping of into associated on the right with (, no 1); then is a non-zero submodule of the module , which is a free module of dimension . Let be the largest invariant factor of with respect to (chap. VII, , no 2, th. 1); we know (loc. cit.) that there exists a basis of and an element such that . Let be the basis of (identified with the bidual ) dual to ; we have
Let be the submodule of . We shall see that is direct sum of and the orthogonal submodule of . For this, it is enough to prove that, for every , there exist elements of , uniquely determined, such that , that is to say such that
According to (1) these conditions are written
But we know (loc. cit.) that the image of by every linear form on is contained in the ideal , in other words all the values belong to ; hence the existence and uniqueness of and . Thus is a free module of rank ; there exists therefore, in , according to the induction hypothesis, a basis satisfying the conditions of the statement. To prove that the basis of thus obtained also satisfies these conditions, it is enough to prove that divides ; now this follows from the fact that all the values are multiples of . It is then clear that generate . Finally, if is the dual basis of , we have and for and for ; the ideals are therefore the invariant factors of with respect to , which proves their uniqueness (Chapter VII, , No. 2, Theorem 1).
Corollary 1
Let be a commutative field, a finite-dimensional vector space of dimension over , and an alternating bilinear form on E. There then exists a basis of E and a pair integer such that
In particular is of pair rank .
A basis satisfying (2) is called a symplectic basis for .
Remark
It should be noted that this corollary is also an immediate consequence of Proposition 3 of § 4, No. 2 and of its Corollary 1, because with the notation of this proposition, one necessarily has since is alternating.
Corollary 2
Let A be a commutative field, E a finite-dimensional vector space of dimension n over A. For every bivector , there exists a basis of E such that
Indeed, it is enough to note that z identifies canonically with an alternating bilinear form on (Chapter III, § 8, No. 2), and to apply Corollary 1 to this form.
By translating Corollary 1 into matrix language, one obtains:
Corollary 3
Let be a commutative field, an alternating square matrix over . The rank of is an even number , and there exists an invertible matrix over such that
Remark
If is any commutative ring and an alternating square matrix of odd order n over , one has det . This results from Cor. 3 when is a field. A direct proof in the case where is a field of characteristic is as follows: since , one has det , whence . Now, since the determinant of an alternating matrix is a polynomial with integer coefficients with respect to the such that , the principle of extension of algebraic identities (Chapter IV, § 2, No. 5, Scholium) shows that our assertion is then true for an arbitrary commutative ring .
2. Pfaffian of an alternating matrix.
Let be a commutative field of characteristic 0, and an alternating square matrix of even order over . Denote by E the vector space , by () its canonical basis, and by e the element of . The -th exterior power of the bivector is of the form , where is an element of which we shall calculate. The element is a sum of terms of the form
The preceding remarks then prove that is equal to
Introduce then indeterminates indexed by means of the pairs such that , and call P the polynomial over with respect to the , defined by
One therefore has
(6)
Definition 1
Given an alternating matrix of even order over an arbitrary commutative ring , the pfaffian of , denoted by , is the element of , where .
Example
Suppose:
all the other being zero (cf. th. 1). Then the pfaffian of is .
Proposition 1
Let be an alternating matrix of even order over a commutative ring , and let be a square matrix of order over . We have
(7)
Indeed, suppose first that is a field of characteristic 0 and put . Associate with the bivector
of , where denotes the canonical basis of ; consider as the matrix, with respect to the basis , of an endomorphism of . Then the bivector is associated with the matrix since it is equal to . Since the extension of to the exterior algebra is an endomorphism of this algebra (chap. III, § 5, no 9), we have ; since is the homothety of ratio , it follows therefore from (6) and def. 1, that we have , whence (7) in the case under consideration. The general case follows by observing that the two members of (7) are polynomials with integer coefficients in the elements of the matrices and (chap. IV, § 2, no 5, Scholium).
Proposition 2
For every alternating matrix of even order over a commutative ring , one has
3. Symplectic group.
Suppose that the ring is commutative. If is an alternating bilinear form on , the automorphisms of the module leaving invariant are called the symplectic automorphisms (or symplectic transformations) relative to , and they form a group which is called the symplectic group associated with ; it is sometimes denoted by .
Consider in particular, on the module , the alternating bilinear form whose matrix with respect to the canonical basis of is
Conversely, if a square matrix of order over satisfies (9), it is symplectic: it is sufficient indeed to prove that it is invertible; now (9) implies according to prop. 1 of No. 2, hence . We have at the same time proved the following proposition:
Proposition 3
The determinant of a symplectic matrix is equal to 1.
If is a commutative field and an alternating non-degenerate bilinear form on a vector space of even dimension over , the symplectic group associated with is isomorphic to , according to cor. 1 of th. 1.
Exercises. — ¶ 1) Let be a commutative principal ring, a free -module of finite dimension , an alternating bilinear form on ; the ideals () defined in Theorem 1 of No. 1 are called the invariant factors of .
a) Let be a submodule of , and let be the restriction of to . Show that if () are the invariant factors of (where divides ), then and is a multiple of for . (Reduce to the case where , and use Exercises 9 b) and 9 c) of Chapter VII, § 4).
b) Let be a second free -module of finite dimension, an alternating bilinear form on , its invariant factors ( dividing ). In order that be the inverse image of by a linear mapping of into , it is necessary and sufficient that and that be a multiple of for . (Use a) and Proposition 4 of Chapter VII, § 4, No. 5).
c) Let be two submodules of , such that (resp. ) is supplementary to (resp. ) in . If the restrictions of to and are equivalent, show that the same is true of the restrictions of to and to , and that there exists an automorphism of leaving invariant and transforming into .
d) Give an example of two submodules of , of dimension 2, such that and admit complements in and such that the restrictions and are equivalent, but that there is no automorphism of leaving invariant and transforming into (take ).
2) Let be an alternating bilinear form on a finite-dimensional vector space . Show that for every vector subspace of , the difference dim M – dim (M ∩ M^0) is even. (Consider first the case where is non-degenerate).
¶ 3) Let E be a vector space of even dimension n = 2m over a commutative field A; let and be two alternating bilinear forms on E; suppose that is non-degenerate. Let u and v be the linear mappings from E into E* associated on the right to and respectively; v is an isomorphism of E onto E*; put , so that is an endomorphism of E.
a) Put M_0 = E, and, recursively, M_{k+1} = ω(M_k) for k > 0. Show that if M'_k is the orthogonal subspace to M_k for , M_{k+1} is the orthogonal subspace to M'_k for .
b) Let n_0 be the dimension of M'_0; put m_0 = 0, and for k ≥ 1, denote by m_k the dimension of M_k ∩ M'_0. Show that for k ≥ 1 the dimension of M_k is n − n_0 − (m_1 + ... + m_{k−1}) and that of M'_k is n_0 + (m_1 + ... + m_k).
c) Show that, for every k ≥ 0, the dimension of M_k ∩ M'_k is m_k + m_{k+1} + ... + m_{2k}, and that of M'_k ∩ M_{k+1} is m_{k+1} + m_{k+2} + ... + m_{2k+1} (apply Exercise 2 b) of § 3 to calculate the dimensions of M_h ∩ M'_{2k−h} and of M'_h ∩ M_{2k+1−h} by induction on h).
d) Deduce from c) that the numbers m_k are even (use Exercise 2).
e) Conclude from d) that the number of elementary divisors of the endomorphism ω, corresponding to the characteristic root λ = 0, and having a given degree, is even (cf. Chapter VII, § 5, Exercise 20).
4) Let E be a vector space over a commutative field A, admitting a countable basis (e_n)_{n≥1}, and let be a non-degenerate alternating form on E. Show that there exists in E a basis (a_n) such that Φ(a_{2n−1}, a_{2n}) = 1 for every n ≥ 1, and Φ(a_i, a_j) = 0 for every other pair of indices such that i < j (reason as in Exercise 13 of § 4).
5) For every alternating matrix X = (x_{ij}) of even order n = 2m over a commutative ring, and for every index i, show that one has
6) Let M be a square matrix of order m over a commutative ring. Show that if one puts
7) Let A be a commutative field, the set of alternating matrices of order 2m over A; let I be a mapping of into A such that for every matrix R ∈ and every matrix P of order 2m over A, one has I(^tPRP) = (det P)^h I(R), where h is a rational integer. Show that I(R) = c(PfR)^h, where c ∈ A (use formula (7) and Theorem 1 of No. 1).
8) Let P, Q be two square alternating matrices of even order 2m over a commutative ring A. Let φ(X) = Pf(P − XQ); show that, if Q is invertible, one has . (Consider first the case where A is a field; deduce then from Exercise 3 that the minimal polynomial of the matrix divides , on passing to an algebraically closed extension of A, and observing that is the characteristic polynomial of up to a scalar factor).
§ 9) Let E be a vector space of dimension over a commutative field A, an alternating bilinear form on E, a hermitian sesquilinear form (for an involutory automorphism of A) on E, P and Q the respective matrices of and with respect to the same basis of E.
a) Suppose that is non-degenerate. Show that the number of elementary divisors of corresponding to the characteristic root 0 and having the same even degree is an even number (method of Exercise 3).
b) Suppose that is non-degenerate (which implies that is even). Show that the number of elementary divisors of corresponding to the characteristic root 0, and having the same odd degree, is an even number (same method).
10) Let be the order of the symplectic group over the finite field . Show that if is the number of pairs of vectors of such that (notations of No. 3), one has ; deduce
11) Let A be a commutative field. Show that every transformation belonging to the symplectic group is a product of transvections belonging to this group (called symplectic transvections; cf. § 4, Exercise 6). (Reason by induction on , showing that if are two non-orthogonal vectors of , there exists a product of symplectic transvections such that leaves and invariant.) Deduce a new proof of Proposition 3 of No. 3.
12) Let A be a commutative field, E a vector space of even dimension over A, a non-degenerate alternating bilinear form on E. Now prove that, for every similitude for the form (, no 5), with multiplier , one has (use formula (7)).
§ 13) We suppose that A is a commutative field of characteristic 0, E a vector space of dimension over A, a non-degenerate alternating bilinear form on E. We identify the inverse form of with a bivector , in such a way that for every symplectic basis of E (for ), indexed so that , (), one has
We say that a decomposable and nonzero -vector is isotropic (resp. totally isotropic) for , if the corresponding vector subspace (chap. III, § 7, no 3) is isotropic (resp. totally isotropic).
a) If is a decomposable -vector , the dimension of a supplement of relative to , now prove that is the largest of the integers such that , denoting by the -th power of in the exterior algebra (use prop. 2 of § 4, n° 2).
b) Now prove that every bivector can be written in the form , where is a scalar and a linear combination of decomposable totally isotropic bivectors. (Reduce to the case where is decomposable, and observe that if is a symplectic basis, is totally isotropic).
c) If , now prove that every -vector can be written , where is a -vector and a linear combination of decomposable totally isotropic -vectors. (Reduce to the case where is decomposable, and reason by induction on . Thus reduce to the case where, being a symplectic basis, one has , and consider the bivectors for .
d) For , now prove that every -vector can be written , where is an -vector. (Reduce to the case where is decomposable; if is the dimension of a supplement of with respect to , distinguish two cases, according as or ; in the second case, reason by induction on , in the same way as in c)). Deduce that the mapping of into is bijective (observe that the two spaces have the same dimension). If is a decomposable -vector, show that is decomposable and that .
e) Deduce from d) that, for , the subspace is the direct sum of the homogeneous component of degree of the two-sided ideal generated by in , and of the subspace of the -vectors such that (for , apply d) to the -vector ). Using c), proving that is generated by the totally isotropic decomposable -vectors, and using d), show that the mapping of into is injective, and that has dimension .
f) Now prove that if , a necessary and sufficient condition for a -vector to be of the form is that, for every totally isotropic decomposable -vector , one have . (Now prove that, if this condition is satisfied, and if , one has for every -vector ; put in the form , where is a -vector, and then apply c) to , and observe that, if is a totally isotropic decomposable -vector, is a decomposable -vector which can be written , where is a totally isotropic decomposable -vector).
Let be the annihilator of the ideal in ; is the direct sum of the subspaces and . Now prove that the annihilator of in is equal to (cf. § 2, exerc. 4 b)).
g) For every symplectic automorphism of (for ), let be the canonical extension of to an automorphism of the algebra (chap. III, § 5, no 9). Now prove that the only elements of invariant under all the automorphisms are the linear combinations of with coefficients in . (If is a symplectic basis, write that an element of is invariant under the symplectic transvections (exerc. 11) corresponding to the hyperplanes orthogonal to the ; then consider the symplectic transformations defined by for every other index ).
14) Let be a commutative field of characteristic 2, the vector space ; we identify the symplectic group with the group of symplectic matrices , satisfying therefore the relation , where . Put ; now prove that every symplectic matrix such that is invertible can be written in one and only one way in the form , where is a symmetric matrix such that is invertible, and conversely (cf. § 4, exerc. 11).
15) Let be a commutative field, a vector space of dimension over , a non-degenerate alternating bilinear form on . a) Extend to the endomorphisms of such that ( being the adjoint of for ) the results of § 4, exerc. 12 a) and b).
b) Suppose that . With the notations of exerc. 12 of § 4, show that if is a minimal element of the set of non-isotropic subspaces contained in and stable under , then either is an indecomposable submodule of , or it is the direct sum of two such isomorphic submodules (reason as in exerc. 12 c) of § 4). Give examples (with ) showing that both cases can occur.
c) Suppose that , not being of characteristic 2. With the same notations, let be the minimal polynomial of the restriction of to , and let be the degree of . Show that if is odd, is an indecomposable submodule of ; if, on the contrary, is even, is either indecomposable or the direct sum of two isomorphic indecomposable submodules.
d) Suppose that (in other words, ). With the same notations as in c), if does not divide , or if and , is an indecomposable submodule of ; otherwise, is either indecomposable or the direct sum of two isomorphic indecomposable submodules.