Bourbaki

§ 5. Special Properties of Alternating Bilinear Forms

1. Reduction of Alternating Bilinear Forms.

Theorem 1

Let AA be a (commutative) principal ring, EE a free AA-module of finite dimension nn and Φ\Phi an alternating bilinear form on EE. Then there exists a basis (ei)1≤i≤n(e_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n} of EE and an even integer 2r≤n2r \leq n, such that

1o1^o Φ(e1,e2)=α1,Φ(e3,e4)=α2,…,Φ(e2r−1,e2r)=αr\Phi(e_1, e_2) = \alpha_1, \Phi(e_3, e_4) = \alpha_2, \ldots, \Phi(e_{2r-1}, e_{2r}) = \alpha_r

where the αi\alpha_i are elements ≠0\neq 0 of AA, and where αi\alpha_i divides αi+1\alpha_{i+1} for i=1,…,r−1i = 1, \ldots, r-1.

2o2^o All the other elements Φ(ei,ej)\Phi(e_i, e_j) where i≤ji \leq j are zero.

The ideals AαiA \alpha_i (i=1,…,ri = 1, \ldots, r) are uniquely determined by the preceding conditions. The submodule E0E^0 of EE orthogonal to EE is generated by e2r+1,…,ene_{2r+1}, \ldots, e_n.

We shall proceed by induction on the dimension nn of EE. The theorem is evident for n=0n = 0. If Φ=0\Phi = 0, the theorem is evident also; we may therefore suppose Φ≠0\Phi \neq 0. Let ff be the linear mapping dΦd_\Phi of EE into E∗E^* associated on the right with Φ\Phi (§1§ 1, no 1); then f(E)f(E) is a non-zero submodule of the module E∗E^*, which is a free module of dimension nn. Let Aα1A\alpha_1 be the largest invariant factor of f(E)f(E) with respect to E∗E^* (chap. VII, §4§ 4, no 2, th. 1); we know (loc. cit.) that there exists a basis (e1′,a2′,…,an′)(e'_1, a'_2, \ldots, a'_n) of E∗E^* and an element f(e2)∈f(E)f(e_2) \in f(E) such that f(e2)=α1e1′f(e_2) = \alpha_1 e'_1. Let (e1,a2,…,an)(e_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n) be the basis of EE (identified with the bidual E∗∗E^{**}) dual to (e1′,a2′,…,an′)(e'_1, a'_2, \ldots, a'_n); we have

Φ(e1,e2)=−Φ(e2,e1)=⟨e1,f(e2)⟩=α1. \Phi(e_1, e_2) = -\Phi(e_2, e_1) = \langle e_1, f(e_2) \rangle = \alpha_1.

Let PP be the submodule Ae1+Ae2Ae_1 + Ae_2 of EE. We shall see that EE is direct sum of Ae1,Ae2Ae_1, Ae_2 and the orthogonal submodule P0P^0 of PP. For this, it is enough to prove that, for every x∈Ex \in E, there exist elements ξ1,ξ2\xi_1, \xi_2 of AA, uniquely determined, such that x−ξ1e1−ξ2e2∈P0x - \xi_1 e_1 - \xi_2 e_2 \in P^0, that is to say such that

Φ(e1,x−ξ1e1−ξ2e2)=0,Φ(e2,x−ξ1e1−ξ2e2)=0. \Phi(e_1, x - \xi_1 e_1 - \xi_2 e_2) = 0, \qquad \Phi(e_2, x - \xi_1 e_1 - \xi_2 e_2) = 0.

According to (1) these conditions are written

⟨e1,f(x)⟩=ξ2α1,⟨e2,f(x)⟩=−ξ1α1. \langle e_1, f(x) \rangle = \xi_2 \alpha_1, \langle e_2, f(x) \rangle = -\xi_1 \alpha_1.

But we know (loc. cit.) that the image of f(E)f(E) by every linear form on E∗E^* is contained in the ideal Aα1A\alpha_1, in other words all the values Φ(x,y)=⟨x,f(y)⟩\Phi(x, y) = \langle x, f(y) \rangle belong to Aα1A\alpha_1; hence the existence and uniqueness of ξ1\xi_1 and ξ2\xi_2. Thus P0P^0 is a free module of rank n−2n-2; there exists therefore, in P0P^0, according to the induction hypothesis, a basis (e3,e4,…,en)(e_3, e_4, \ldots, e_n) satisfying the conditions of the statement. To prove that the basis (e1,…,en)(e_1, \ldots, e_n) of EE thus obtained also satisfies these conditions, it is enough to prove that α1\alpha_1 divides α2\alpha_2; now this follows from the fact that all the values Φ(x,y)\Phi(x, y) are multiples of α1\alpha_1. It is then clear that e2r+1,…,ene_{2r+1}, \ldots, e_n generate E0E^0. Finally, if (ei′)(e'_i) is the dual basis of (ei)(e_i), we have f(e2j−1)=−αje2j′f(e_{2j-1}) = -\alpha_j e'_{2j} and f(e2j)=αje2j′f(e_{2j}) = \alpha_j e'_{2j} for j=1,…,rj = 1, \ldots, r and f(ek)=0f(e_k) = 0 for k=2r+1,…,nk = 2r+1, \ldots, n; the ideals Aα1,Aα1,Aα2,Aα2,…,Aαr,AαrA\alpha_1, A\alpha_1, A\alpha_2, A\alpha_2, \ldots, A\alpha_r, A\alpha_r are therefore the invariant factors of f(E)f(E) with respect to E∗E^*, which proves their uniqueness (Chapter VII, §4§ 4, No. 2, Theorem 1).

Corollary 1

Let AA be a commutative field, EE a finite-dimensional vector space of dimension nn over AA, and Φ\Phi an alternating bilinear form on E. There then exists a basis (ei)1≤i≤n(e_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n} of E and a pair integer 2r≤n2r \leq n such that

Φ(∑i=1nξiei,∑i=1nηiei)=∑j=1r(ξ2j−1η2j−ξ2jη2j−1). \Phi\left( \sum_{i=1}^n \xi_i e_i, \sum_{i=1}^n \eta_i e_i \right) = \sum_{j=1}^r (\xi_{2j-1} \eta_{2j} - \xi_{2j} \eta_{2j-1}).

In particular Φ\Phi is of pair rank 2r2r.

A basis satisfying (2) is called a symplectic basis for Φ\Phi.

Remark

It should be noted that this corollary is also an immediate consequence of Proposition 3 of § 4, No. 2 and of its Corollary 1, because with the notation of this proposition, one necessarily has H={0}H = \{0\} since Φ\Phi is alternating.

Corollary 2

Let A be a commutative field, E a finite-dimensional vector space of dimension n over A. For every bivector z∈⋀2Ez \in \bigwedge^2 E, there exists a basis (ei)1≤i≤n(e_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n} of E such that

z=e1∧e2+e3∧e4+⋯+e2r−1∧e2r(2r≤n). z = e_1 \wedge e_2 + e_3 \wedge e_4 + \cdots + e_{2r-1} \wedge e_{2r} \quad (2r \leq n).

Indeed, it is enough to note that z identifies canonically with an alternating bilinear form on E∗E^* (Chapter III, § 8, No. 2), and to apply Corollary 1 to this form.

By translating Corollary 1 into matrix language, one obtains:

Corollary 3

Let AA be a commutative field, RR an alternating square matrix over AA. The rank of RR is an even number 2r2r, and there exists an invertible matrix PP over AA such that

tP.R.P=(0Ir0−Ir00000). {}^tP.R.P = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & I_r & 0 \\ -I_r & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}.

Remark

If AA is any commutative ring and RR an alternating square matrix of odd order n over AA, one has det R=0R = 0. This results from Cor. 3 when AA is a field. A direct proof in the case where AA is a field of characteristic ≠2\neq 2 is as follows: since tR=−R{}^tR = -R, one has det R=det⁡tR=(−1)ndet⁡RR = \det {}^tR = (-1)^n \det R, whence 2det⁡tR=02 \det {}^tR = 0. Now, since the determinant of an alternating matrix (αij)(\alpha_{ij}) is a polynomial with integer coefficients with respect to the αij\alpha_{ij} such that i<ji < j, the principle of extension of algebraic identities (Chapter IV, § 2, No. 5, Scholium) shows that our assertion is then true for an arbitrary commutative ring AA.

2. Pfaffian of an alternating matrix.

Let AA be a commutative field of characteristic 0, and R=(αij)R = (\alpha_{ij}) an alternating square matrix of even order 2m2m over AA. Denote by E the vector space A2mA^{2m}, by (ei)(e_i) (i=1,…,2mi = 1, \ldots, 2m) its canonical basis, and by e the element e1∧e2∧…∧e2me_1 \wedge e_2 \wedge \ldots \wedge e_{2m} of ∧2E\wedge^2 E. The mm-th exterior power of the bivector u=∑i<jαijei∧ej∈∧2Eu = \sum_{i < j} \alpha_{ij} e_i \wedge e_j \in \wedge^2 E is of the form α.e\alpha . e, where α\alpha is an element of AA which we shall calculate. The element ∧mu\wedge^m u is a sum of terms of the form

αh1k1αh2k2⋯αhmkmeh1∧ek1∧eh2∧ek2∧…∧ehm∧ekm \alpha_{h_1 k_1} \alpha_{h_2 k_2} \cdots \alpha_{h_m k_m} e_{h_1} \wedge e_{k_1} \wedge e_{h_2} \wedge e_{k_2} \wedge \ldots \wedge e_{h_m} \wedge e_{k_m}
with hj<kjh_j < k_j for j=1,…,mj = 1, \ldots, m. Such a term is zero if two equal eje_j occur in it, that is to say if the set {h1,k1,…,hm,km}\{ h_1, k_1, \ldots, h_m, k_m \} is not exactly {1,2,…,2m}\{ 1, 2, \ldots, 2m \}. Moreover, if, in (3), one simultaneously exchanges ehre_{h_r} and ehr+1e_{h_{r+1}} on the one hand, ekre_{k_r} and ekr+1e_{k_{r+1}} on the other hand, the product does not change; it therefore does not change under any permutation performed on the pairs (h1,k1),…,(hm,km)(h_1, k_1), \ldots, (h_m, k_m). Consider then the sets (and not the sequences) S={(h1,k1),…,(hm,km)}S = \{ (h_1, k_1), \ldots, (h_m, k_m) \} of pairs (hj,kj)(h_j, k_j) such that 1≤hj<kj≤2m1 \leq h_j < k_j \leq 2m for j=1,2,…,mj = 1, 2, \ldots, m; let S\mathscr{S} be the set of these pairs. For S∈SS \in \mathscr{S}, put 1°) ε(S)=0\varepsilon(S) = 0 if {h1,k1,…,hm,km}≠{1,2,…,2m}\{ h_1, k_1, \ldots, h_m, k_m \} \neq \{ 1, 2, \ldots, 2m \}; 2°) in the contrary case, ε(S)=1\varepsilon(S) = 1 or ε(S)=−1\varepsilon(S) = -1 according as the permutation which maps hjh_j onto 2j−12j-1 and kjk_j onto 2j2j (j=1,…,mj = 1, \ldots, m) is even or odd.

The preceding remarks then prove that ∧mu\wedge^m u is equal to

m!∑S∈Sε(S)(∏(h,k)∈Sαhk)e. m! \sum_{S \in \mathscr{S}} \varepsilon(S) (\prod_{(h, k) \in S} \alpha_{hk}) e.

Introduce then m(2m−1)m(2m-1) indeterminates XhkX_{hk} indexed by means of the pairs (h,k)(h, k) such that 1≤h<k≤2m1 \leq h < k \leq 2m, and call P the polynomial over Z\mathbf{Z} with respect to the XhkX_{hk}, defined by

P((Xhk))=∑S∈Sε(S)(∏(h,k)∈SXhk). P((X_{hk})) = \sum_{S \in \mathscr{S}} \varepsilon(S) (\prod_{(h, k) \in S} X_{hk}).

One therefore has

(6) ⋀mu=m!P((αhk)).e.\bigwedge^m u = m! \mathrm{P}((\alpha_{hk})) . e.

Definition 1

Given an alternating matrix R=(αij)R = (\alpha_{ij}) (i,j=1,…,2m)(i, j = 1, \ldots, 2m) of even order 2m2m over an arbitrary commutative ring AA, the pfaffian of RR, denoted by Pf(R)\mathrm{Pf}(R), is the element P((αhk))\mathrm{P}((\alpha_{hk})) of AA, where 1≤h<k≤2m1 \leq h < k \leq 2m.

Example

Suppose:

α12=−α21=β1,α34=−α43=β2,…,α2m−1,2m=−α2m,2m−1=βm,\alpha_{12} = -\alpha_{21} = \beta_1, \alpha_{34} = -\alpha_{43} = \beta_2, \ldots, \alpha_{2m-1, 2m} = -\alpha_{2m, 2m-1} = \beta_m,

all the other αij\alpha_{ij} being zero (cf. th. 1). Then the pfaffian of R=(αij)R = (\alpha_{ij}) is β1β2…βm\beta_1 \beta_2 \ldots \beta_m.

Proposition 1

Let RR be an alternating matrix of even order 2m2m over a commutative ring AA, and let PP be a square matrix of order 2m2m over AA. We have

(7) Pf(tP.R.P)=(det⁡P)Pf(R).\mathrm{Pf}({}^t P . R . P) = (\det P) \mathrm{Pf}(R).

Indeed, suppose first that AA is a field of characteristic 0 and put R=(αij),P=(βst)R = (\alpha_{ij}), P = (\beta_{st}). Associate with RR the bivector

u=∑i<jαijei∧ej=12∑1≤i,j≤2mαijei∧ej u = \sum_{i < j} \alpha_{ij} e_i \wedge e_j = \frac{1}{2} \sum_{1 \leq i, j \leq 2m} \alpha_{ij} e_i \wedge e_j

of ⋀2A2m\bigwedge^2 \mathbf{A}^{2m}, where (ei)(e_i) denotes the canonical basis of A2m\mathbf{A}^{2m}; consider tP{}^t P as the matrix, with respect to the basis (ei)(e_i), of an endomorphism ff of A2m\mathbf{A}^{2m}. Then the bivector (⋀f)(u)(\bigwedge f)(u) is associated with the matrix tP.R.P{}^t P . R . P since it is equal to 12∑i,j,s,tβisαijβjtes∧et\frac{1}{2} \sum_{i, j, s, t} \beta_{is} \alpha_{ij} \beta_{jt} e_s \wedge e_t. Since the extension ⋀f\bigwedge f of ff to the exterior algebra ⋀A2m\bigwedge \mathbf{A}^{2m} is an endomorphism of this algebra (chap. III, § 5, no 9), we have ⋀((⋀f)(u))=(⋀f)(⋀u)\bigwedge ((\bigwedge f)(u)) = (\bigwedge f)(\bigwedge u); since ⋀f\bigwedge f is the homothety of ratio det⁡f\det f, it follows therefore from (6) and def. 1, that we have m!Pf(tP.R.P)=m!(det⁡P)Pf(R)m! \mathrm{Pf}({}^t P . R . P) = m! (\det P) \mathrm{Pf}(R), whence (7) in the case under consideration. The general case follows by observing that the two members of (7) are polynomials with integer coefficients in the elements of the matrices RR and PP (chap. IV, § 2, no 5, Scholium).

Proposition 2

For every alternating matrix RR of even order 2m2m over a commutative ring AA, one has

det⁡R=(Pf(R))2. \det R = (\mathrm{Pf}(R))^2.
Indeed, since the two members of (8) are polynomials with integer coefficients with respect to the elements of RR, the principle of prolongation of algebraic identities (chap. IV, § 2, No. 5, Scholium) shows that it is sufficient to give the proof in the case where AA is a field of characteristic 0 and where det⁡R≠0\det R \neq 0. If PP is an invertible square matrix of order 2m2m over AA, one has det⁡(tP.R.P)=(det⁡P)2(det⁡R)\det (^tP . R . P) = (\det P)^2 (\det R) and Pf(tP.R.P)=(det⁡P)Pf(R)\mathrm{Pf} (^tP . R . P) = (\det P) \mathrm{Pf}(R) (prop. 1), so that it is sufficient to prove (8) for tP.R.P^tP . R . P instead of RR. According to cor. 1 of th. 1, by a suitable choice of PP, one can suppose that the matrix tP.R.P^tP . R . P is of the form (αij)(\alpha_{ij}) where
α12=−α21=1,…,α2m−1,2m=−α2m,2m−1=1, \alpha_{12} = -\alpha_{21} = 1, \ldots, \alpha_{2m-1, 2m} = -\alpha_{2m, 2m-1} = 1,
all the other αij\alpha_{ij} being zero (cf. Example). Now the determinant of this matrix is equal to 1, and its Pfaffian also; this completes the proof.

3. Symplectic group.

Suppose that the ring AA is commutative. If Φ\Phi is an alternating bilinear form on EE, the automorphisms of the module EE leaving Φ\Phi invariant are called the symplectic automorphisms (or symplectic transformations) relative to Φ\Phi, and they form a group which is called the symplectic group associated with Φ\Phi; it is sometimes denoted by Sp(Φ)\mathbf{Sp}(\Phi).

Consider in particular, on the module E=A2mE = A^{2m}, the alternating bilinear form Φ0\Phi_0 whose matrix with respect to the canonical basis (ei)(e_i) of EE is

Rm=(0Im−Im0). R_m = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & I_m \\ -I_m & 0 \end{pmatrix}.
The symplectic automorphisms and the symplectic group relative to Φ0\Phi_0 are simply called symplectic automorphisms and symplectic group in 2m2m variables (over AA); this group is denoted by Sp(2m,A)\mathbf{Sp}(2m, A) or Sp2m(A)\mathbf{Sp}_{2m}(A). Every matrix AA of a symplectic automorphism with respect to the canonical basis (e)i(e)_i is called a symplectic matrix. Such a matrix is invertible, and, according to formula (48) of § 1, No. 10, satisfies the relation

(9)(9)
tA.Rm.A=Rm. {}^tA . R_m . A = R_m.

Conversely, if a square matrix AA of order 2m2m over AA satisfies (9), it is symplectic: it is sufficient indeed to prove that it is invertible; now (9) implies Pf(Rm)=Pf(tA.Rm.A)=(det⁡A)Pf(Rm)\mathrm{Pf}(R_m) = \mathrm{Pf}({}^tA . R_m . A) = (\det A) \mathrm{Pf}(R_m) according to prop. 1 of No. 2, hence det⁡A=1\det A = 1. We have at the same time proved the following proposition:

Proposition 3

The determinant of a symplectic matrix is equal to 1.

If AA is a commutative field and Φ\Phi an alternating non-degenerate bilinear form on a vector space EE of even dimension 2m2m over AA, the symplectic group associated with Φ\Phi is isomorphic to Sp(2m,A)\mathbf{Sp}(2m, A), according to cor. 1 of th. 1.

Exercises. — ¶ 1) Let AA be a commutative principal ring, EE a free AA-module of finite dimension nn, Φ\Phi an alternating bilinear form on EE; the ideals AαiA \alpha_i (1≤i≤r1 \leq i \leq r) defined in Theorem 1 of No. 1 are called the invariant factors of Φ\Phi.

a) Let FF be a submodule of EE, and let ΦF\Phi_F be the restriction of Φ\Phi to F×FF \times F. Show that if AβiA \beta_i (1≤i≤s1 \leq i \leq s) are the invariant factors of ΦF\Phi_F (where βi\beta_i divides βi+1\beta_{i+1}), then s≤rs \leq r and βi\beta_i is a multiple of αi\alpha_i for 1≤i≤s1 \leq i \leq s. (Reduce to the case where r=s=n/2r = s = n/2, and use Exercises 9 b) and 9 c) of Chapter VII, § 4).

b) Let E1E_1 be a second free AA-module of finite dimension, Φ1\Phi_1 an alternating bilinear form on E1E_1, Aγ1,…,AγsA \gamma_1, \ldots, A \gamma_s its invariant factors (γi\gamma_i dividing γi+1\gamma_{i+1}). In order that Φ1\Phi_1 be the inverse image of Φ\Phi by a linear mapping of E1E_1 into EE, it is necessary and sufficient that s≤rs \leq r and that γi\gamma_i be a multiple of αi\alpha_i for 1≤i≤s1 \leq i \leq s. (Use a) and Proposition 4 of Chapter VII, § 4, No. 5).

c) Let F,GF, G be two submodules of EE, such that F0F^0 (resp. G0G^0) is supplementary to FF (resp. GG) in EE. If the restrictions of Φ\Phi to FF and GG are equivalent, show that the same is true of the restrictions of Φ\Phi to F0F^0 and to G0G^0, and that there exists an automorphism of EE leaving Φ\Phi invariant and transforming FF into GG.

d) Give an example of two submodules F,GF, G of EE, of dimension 2, such that FF and GG admit complements in EE and such that the restrictions ΦF\Phi_F and ΦG\Phi_G are equivalent, but that there is no automorphism of EE leaving Φ\Phi invariant and transforming FF into GG (take n=4n = 4).

2) Let Φ\Phi be an alternating bilinear form on a finite-dimensional vector space EE. Show that for every vector subspace MM of EE, the difference dim M – dim (M ∩ M^0) is even. (Consider first the case where Φ\Phi is non-degenerate).

¶ 3) Let E be a vector space of even dimension n = 2m over a commutative field A; let Φ\Phi and Ψ\Psi be two alternating bilinear forms on E; suppose that Ψ\Psi is non-degenerate. Let u and v be the linear mappings from E into E* associated on the right to Φ\Phi and Ψ\Psi respectively; v is an isomorphism of E onto E*; put ω=v−1∘u\omega = v^{-1} \circ u, so that ω\omega is an endomorphism of E.

a) Put M_0 = E, and, recursively, M_{k+1} = ω(M_k) for k > 0. Show that if M'_k is the orthogonal subspace to M_k for Φ\Phi, M_{k+1} is the orthogonal subspace to M'_k for Ψ\Psi.

b) Let n_0 be the dimension of M'_0; put m_0 = 0, and for k ≥ 1, denote by m_k the dimension of M_k ∩ M'_0. Show that for k ≥ 1 the dimension of M_k is n − n_0 − (m_1 + ... + m_{k−1}) and that of M'_k is n_0 + (m_1 + ... + m_k).

c) Show that, for every k ≥ 0, the dimension of M_k ∩ M'_k is m_k + m_{k+1} + ... + m_{2k}, and that of M'_k ∩ M_{k+1} is m_{k+1} + m_{k+2} + ... + m_{2k+1} (apply Exercise 2 b) of § 3 to calculate the dimensions of M_h ∩ M'_{2k−h} and of M'_h ∩ M_{2k+1−h} by induction on h).

d) Deduce from c) that the numbers m_k are even (use Exercise 2).

e) Conclude from d) that the number of elementary divisors of the endomorphism ω, corresponding to the characteristic root λ = 0, and having a given degree, is even (cf. Chapter VII, § 5, Exercise 20).

4) Let E be a vector space over a commutative field A, admitting a countable basis (e_n)_{n≥1}, and let Φ\Phi be a non-degenerate alternating form on E. Show that there exists in E a basis (a_n) such that Φ(a_{2n−1}, a_{2n}) = 1 for every n ≥ 1, and Φ(a_i, a_j) = 0 for every other pair of indices such that i < j (reason as in Exercise 13 of § 4).

5) For every alternating matrix X = (x_{ij}) of even order n = 2m over a commutative ring, and for every index i, show that one has

Pf(X)=∑j=1n(−1)i+j−1Pf(Xij)xij, \mathrm{Pf}(X) = \sum_{j=1}^{n} (-1)^{i+j-1} \mathrm{Pf}(X_{ij}) x_{ij},
where X_{ij} is the matrix of order n − 2 obtained by deleting from X the rows and columns with indices i and j.

6) Let M be a square matrix of order m over a commutative ring. Show that if one puts

R=(0M−tM0) R = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & M \\ -^t M & 0 \end{pmatrix}
one has Pf(R) = det M (prove this first when M is invertible, using formula (7)).

7) Let A be a commutative field, A(A)\mathfrak{A}(A) the set of alternating matrices of order 2m over A; let I be a mapping of A(A)\mathfrak{A}(A) into A such that for every matrix R ∈ A(A)\mathfrak{A}(A) and every matrix P of order 2m over A, one has I(^tPRP) = (det P)^h I(R), where h is a rational integer. Show that I(R) = c(PfR)^h, where c ∈ A (use formula (7) and Theorem 1 of No. 1).

8) Let P, Q be two square alternating matrices of even order 2m over a commutative ring A. Let φ(X) = Pf(P − XQ); show that, if Q is invertible, one has φ(Q−1P)=0\varphi(Q^{-1}P) = 0. (Consider first the case where A is a field; deduce then from Exercise 3 that the minimal polynomial of the matrix Q−1PQ^{-1}P divides φ(X)\varphi(X), on passing to an algebraically closed extension of A, and observing that φ2\varphi^2 is the characteristic polynomial of Q−1PQ^{-1}P up to a scalar factor).

§ 9) Let E be a vector space of dimension nn over a commutative field A, Φ\Phi an alternating bilinear form on E, Ψ\Psi a hermitian sesquilinear form (for an involutory automorphism of A) on E, P and Q the respective matrices of Φ\Phi and Ψ\Psi with respect to the same basis of E.

a) Suppose that Ψ\Psi is non-degenerate. Show that the number of elementary divisors of Q−1PQ^{-1}P corresponding to the characteristic root 0 and having the same even degree is an even number (method of Exercise 3).

b) Suppose that Φ\Phi is non-degenerate (which implies that nn is even). Show that the number of elementary divisors of P−1QP^{-1}Q corresponding to the characteristic root 0, and having the same odd degree, is an even number (same method).

10) Let ω2m(Fq)\omega_{2m}(\mathbf{F}_q) be the order of the symplectic group Sp(2m,Fq)\mathbf{Sp}(2m, \mathbf{F}_q) over the finite field Fq\mathbf{F}_q. Show that if h2mh_{2m} is the number of pairs of vectors (x,y)(x, y) of Fq2m\mathbf{F}_q^{2m} such that Φ0(x,y)=1\Phi_0(x, y) = 1 (notations of No. 3), one has ω2m(Fq)=h2mω2m−2(Fq)\omega_{2m}(\mathbf{F}_q) = h_{2m}\omega_{2m-2}(\mathbf{F}_q); deduce

ω2m(Fq)=(q2m−1)q2m−1(q2m−2−1)q2m−3…(q2−1)q. \omega_{2m}(\mathbf{F}_q) = (q^{2m} - 1)q^{2m-1}(q^{2m-2} - 1)q^{2m-3} \ldots (q^2 - 1)q.

11) Let A be a commutative field. Show that every transformation uu belonging to the symplectic group Sp(2m,A)\mathbf{Sp}(2m, A) is a product of transvections belonging to this group (called symplectic transvections; cf. § 4, Exercise 6). (Reason by induction on mm, showing that if x,yx, y are two non-orthogonal vectors of E=A2mE = A^{2m}, there exists a product vv of symplectic transvections such that vuvu leaves xx and yy invariant.) Deduce a new proof of Proposition 3 of No. 3.

12) Let A be a commutative field, E a vector space of even dimension n=2mn = 2m over A, Φ\Phi a non-degenerate alternating bilinear form on E. Now prove that, for every similitude uu for the form Φ\Phi (§6§ 6, no 5), with multiplier α\alpha, one has det⁡u=αm\det u = \alpha^m (use formula (7)).

§ 13) We suppose that A is a commutative field of characteristic 0, E a vector space of dimension 2m2m over A, Φ\Phi a non-degenerate alternating bilinear form on E. We identify the inverse form Φ^\widehat{\Phi} of Φ\Phi with a bivector Γ∈⋀2E\Gamma \in \bigwedge^2 E, in such a way that for every symplectic basis (ei)1≤i≤2m(e_i)_{1 \leq i \leq 2m} of E (for Φ\Phi), indexed so that Φ(ei,ej)=Φ(em+i,em+j)=0\Phi(e_i, e_j) = \Phi(e_{m+i}, e_{m+j}) = 0, Φ(ei,em+j)=δij\Phi(e_i, e_{m+j}) = \delta_{ij} (1≤i≤m,1≤j≤m1 \leq i \leq m, 1 \leq j \leq m), one has

Γ=e1∧em+1+e2∧em+2+⋯+em∧e2m. \Gamma = e_1 \wedge e_{m+1} + e_2 \wedge e_{m+2} + \cdots + e_m \wedge e_{2m}.

We say that a decomposable and nonzero pp-vector z∈⋀pEz \in \bigwedge^p E is isotropic (resp. totally isotropic) for Φ\Phi, if the corresponding vector subspace VzV_z (chap. III, § 7, no 3) is isotropic (resp. totally isotropic).

a) If zz is a decomposable pp-vector ≠0\neq 0, 2r2r the dimension of a supplement of Vz∩Vz0V_z \cap V_z^0 relative to VzV_z, now prove that m−p+rm - p + r is the largest of the integers hh such that z∧Γh≠0z \wedge \Gamma^h \neq 0, denoting by Γh\Gamma^h the hh-th power of Γ\Gamma in the exterior algebra ∧E\wedge E (use prop. 2 of § 4, n° 2).

b) Now prove that every bivector x∈∧2Ex \in \overset{2}{\wedge} E can be written in the form λΓ+x1\lambda \Gamma + x_1, where λ\lambda is a scalar and x1x_1 a linear combination of decomposable totally isotropic bivectors. (Reduce to the case where xx is decomposable, and observe that if (ei)(e_i) is a symplectic basis, (e1+e2)∧(em+1−em+2)(e_1 + e_2) \wedge (e_{m+1} - e_{m+2}) is totally isotropic).

c) If p≤mp \leq m, now prove that every pp-vector z∈∧pEz \in \overset{p}{\wedge} E can be written z=x∧Γ+z1z = x \wedge \Gamma + z_1, where xx is a (p−2)(p-2)-vector and z1z_1 a linear combination of decomposable totally isotropic pp-vectors. (Reduce to the case where zz is decomposable, and reason by induction on pp. Thus reduce to the case where, (ei)(e_i) being a symplectic basis, one has z=e1∧e2∧…∧ep−1∧em+p−1z = e_1 \wedge e_2 \wedge \ldots \wedge e_{p-1} \wedge e_{m+p-1}, and consider the bivectors (ep−1+ep+i)∧(em+p−1−em+p+i)(e_{p-1} + e_{p+i}) \wedge (e_{m+p-1} - e_{m+p+i}) for 0≤i≤m−p0 \leq i \leq m-p.

d) For 1≤p≤m1 \leq p \leq m, now prove that every (m+p)(m+p)-vector z∈∧m+pEz \in \overset{m+p}{\wedge} E can be written z=y∧Γpz = y \wedge \Gamma^p, where yy is an (m−p)(m-p)-vector. (Reduce to the case where zz is decomposable; if 2r2r is the dimension of a supplement of Vz∩Vz0V_z \cap V_z^0 with respect to VzV_z, distinguish two cases, according as r=pr = p or r>pr > p; in the second case, reason by induction on rr, in the same way as in c)). Deduce that the mapping y→y∧Γpy \to y \wedge \Gamma^p of ∧m+pE\overset{m+p}{\wedge} E into ∧m+pE\overset{m+p}{\wedge} E is bijective (observe that the two spaces have the same dimension). If yy is a decomposable (m−p)(m-p)-vector, show that z=y∧Γpz = y \wedge \Gamma^p is decomposable and that Vz=Vy0V_z = V_y^0.

e) Deduce from d) that, for p≤mp \leq m, the subspace ∧pE\overset{p}{\wedge} E is the direct sum of the homogeneous component of degree pp of the two-sided ideal cc generated by Γ\Gamma in ∧E\wedge E, and of the subspace RpR_p of the pp-vectors z1z_1 such that z1∧Γm−p+1=0z_1 \wedge \Gamma^{m-p+1} = 0 (for z∈∧pEz \in \overset{p}{\wedge} E, apply d) to the (2m−p+2)(2m-p+2)-vector z∧Γm−p+1z \wedge \Gamma^{m-p+1}). Using c), proving that RpR_p is generated by the totally isotropic decomposable pp-vectors, and using d), show that the mapping x→x∧Γx \to x \wedge \Gamma of ∧p−2E\overset{p-2}{\wedge} E into ∧pE\overset{p}{\wedge} E is injective, and that RpR_p has dimension (2mp)−(2mp−2)\binom{2m}{p} - \binom{2m}{p-2}.

f) Now prove that if p≤mp \leq m, a necessary and sufficient condition for a pp-vector zz to be of the form x∧Γx \wedge \Gamma is that, for every totally isotropic decomposable mm-vector uu, one have z∧u=0z \wedge u = 0. (Now prove that, if this condition is satisfied, and if z∈Rpz \in R_p, one has z∧y=0z \wedge y = 0 for every (2m−p)(2m-p)-vector yy; put yy in the form x∧Γm−px \wedge \Gamma^{m-p}, where xx is a pp-vector, and then apply c) to xx, and observe that, if x1x_1 is a totally isotropic decomposable pp-vector, x1∧Γm−px_1 \wedge \Gamma^{m-p} is a decomposable (2m−p)(2m-p)-vector which can be written u1∧v1u_1 \wedge v_1, where u1u_1 is a totally isotropic decomposable mm-vector).

Let α\alpha be the annihilator of the ideal cc in ∧E\wedge E; α\alpha is the direct sum of the subspaces Rm,Rm−1∧Γ,…,R1∧Γm−1R_m, R_{m-1} \wedge \Gamma, \ldots, R_1 \wedge \Gamma^{m-1} and KΓmK \Gamma^m. Now prove that the annihilator of α\alpha in ∧E\wedge E is equal to cc (cf. § 2, exerc. 4 b)).

g) For every symplectic automorphism uu of EE (for Φ\Phi), let uˉ\bar{u} be the canonical extension of uu to an automorphism of the algebra ∧E\wedge E (chap. III, § 5, no 9). Now prove that the only elements of ∧E\wedge E invariant under all the automorphisms uˉ\bar{u} are the linear combinations of 1,Γ,Γ2,…,Γm1, \Gamma, \Gamma^2, \ldots, \Gamma^m with coefficients in KK. (If (ei)(e_i) is a symplectic basis, write that an element of ∧E\wedge E is invariant under the symplectic transvections (exerc. 11) corresponding to the hyperplanes orthogonal to the eie_i; then consider the symplectic transformations uiju_{ij} defined by uij(ei)=ej,uij(ej)=ei,uij(em+i)=em+j,uij(em+j)=em+i,uij(ek)=eku_{ij}(e_i) = e_j, u_{ij}(e_j) = e_i, u_{ij}(e_{m+i}) = e_{m+j}, u_{ij}(e_{m+j}) = e_{m+i}, u_{ij}(e_k) = e_k for every other index kk).

14) Let AA be a commutative field of characteristic 2, EE the vector space A2mA^{2m}; we identify the symplectic group Sp(2m,A)Sp(2m, A) with the group of symplectic matrices UU, satisfying therefore the relation tU.R.U=R^tU . R . U = R, where R=(0ImIm0)R = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & I_m \\ I_m & 0 \end{pmatrix}. Put D=(00Im0)D = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ I_m & 0 \end{pmatrix}; now prove that every symplectic matrix UU such that I+UI + U is invertible can be written in one and only one way in the form (tD+S)−1(D+S)(^tD + S)^{-1}(D + S), where SS is a symmetric matrix such that D+SD + S is invertible, and conversely (cf. § 4, exerc. 11).

15) Let AA be a commutative field, EE a vector space of dimension 2m2m over AA, Φ\Phi a non-degenerate alternating bilinear form on EE. a) Extend to the endomorphisms uu of EE such that u∗u=uu∗u^*u = uu^* (u∗u^* being the adjoint of uu for Φ\Phi) the results of § 4, exerc. 12 a) and b).

b) Suppose that u∗=uu^* = u. With the notations of exerc. 12 of § 4, show that if MM is a minimal element of the set M\mathfrak{M} of non-isotropic subspaces contained in G(p,p)G(p, p) and stable under uu, then either MM is an indecomposable submodule of EuE_u, or it is the direct sum of two such isomorphic submodules (reason as in exerc. 12 c) of § 4). Give examples (with p(X)=X−1p(X) = X - 1) showing that both cases can occur.

c) Suppose that u∗=−uu^* = -u, AA not being of characteristic 2. With the same notations, let php^h be the minimal polynomial of the restriction of uu to MM, and let dd be the degree of pp. Show that if d(h−1)d(h-1) is odd, MM is an indecomposable submodule of EuE_u; if, on the contrary, d(h−1)d(h-1) is even, MM is either indecomposable or the direct sum of two isomorphic indecomposable submodules.

d) Suppose that u∗u=1u^*u = 1 (in other words, u∈Sp(Φ)u \in Sp(\Phi)). With the same notations as in c), if p(X)p(X) does not divide Xd(h−1)−1X^{d(h-1)} - 1, or if p(X)=X−1p(X) = X - 1 and (−1)h≠−1(-1)^h \neq -1, MM is an indecomposable submodule of EuE_u; otherwise, MM is either indecomposable or the direct sum of two isomorphic indecomposable submodules.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.