Theorem 1 (« law of inertia »)
Tag 0DM1, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DM1].
Algebra, chapter IX, § 7. Formes hermitiennes et corps ordonnés
Suppose that satisfies the hypotheses at the beginning of this paragraph, and that is of finite dimension . Let be a hermitian form on . Then:
a) There exists a decomposition of into a direct sum of the subspace orthogonal to , and of two subspaces and such that the restriction of to (resp. ) is positive (resp. negative) and non-degenerate.
b) There exists an orthogonal basis of such that
c) The dimensions of and of are the same for all the decompositions into a direct sum satisfying the conditions stated in a) ; the integer (resp. ) is the maximum of the dimensions of the subspaces of such that the restriction of to is positive (resp. negative) and non-degenerate.
d) The rank of is .
e) If is non-degenerate, its index is equal to (§ 4, no 2, def. 2).
Indeed, let () be an orthogonal basis of (§ 6, No. 1, Theorem 1); recall that for every . We may suppose that for , for and for . This proves a), since we take for (resp. ) the subspace generated by (resp. by ), and is then generated by . We deduce b) from this by observing that is of the form (resp.
- for (resp. ). To prove c), consider a subspace P of E such that the restriction of to P is positive and non-degenerate; we then have , and the sum is therefore direct; we conclude that , and this proves c). Assertion d) follows at once from a).
Suppose finally that is non-degenerate, put , and show that q is the index of . With the notations of b), the vectors (resp. ) () generate a totally isotropic subspace F (resp. ). Since K is of characteristic 0, is generated by and is therefore non-isotropic. The restriction of to the subspace is then positive (or negative) and non-degenerate, and H contains therefore no isotropic vector . Since contains F and H, and since , we have . Thus an isotropic vector z orthogonal to F is necessarily in F, because, in the direct sum , the component of z in H is isotropic. Consequently F is a maximal totally isotropic subspace, and this proves e).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.