Bourbaki

Theorem 1 (« law of inertia »)

Tag 0DM1, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DM1].

Algebra, chapter IX, § 7. Formes hermitiennes et corps ordonnés

Suppose that AA satisfies the hypotheses at the beginning of this paragraph, and that EE is of finite dimension nn. Let Φ\Phi be a hermitian form on EE. Then:

a) There exists a decomposition of EE into a direct sum of the subspace E0E^0 orthogonal to EE, and of two subspaces E+E^+ and E−E^- such that the restriction of Φ\Phi to E+E^+ (resp. E−E^-) is positive (resp. negative) and non-degenerate.

b) There exists an orthogonal basis (ei)1≤i≤n(e_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n} of EE such that

Φ(∑i=1nξiei,∑i=1nηiei)=∑i=1sξiηi‾−∑i=s+1s+tξiηi‾. \Phi\left( \sum_{i=1}^n \xi_i e_i, \sum_{i=1}^n \eta_i e_i \right) = \sum_{i=1}^s \xi_i \overline{\eta_i} - \sum_{i=s+1}^{s+t} \xi_i \overline{\eta_i}.

c) The dimensions ss of E+E^+ and tt of E−E^- are the same for all the decompositions into a direct sum satisfying the conditions stated in a) ; the integer ss (resp. tt) is the maximum of the dimensions of the subspaces FF of EE such that the restriction of Φ\Phi to FF is positive (resp. negative) and non-degenerate.

d) The rank of Φ\Phi is s+ts + t.

e) If Φ\Phi is non-degenerate, its index is equal to inf⁡(s,t)\inf(s, t) (§ 4, no 2, def. 2).

Indeed, let (xi)(x_i) (i=1,…,ni = 1, \ldots, n) be an orthogonal basis of EE (§ 6, No. 1, Theorem 1); recall that Φ(x,x)∈K\Phi(x, x) \in K for every x∈Ex \in E. We may suppose that Φ(xi,xi)>0\Phi(x_i, x_i) > 0 for i=1,…,si = 1, \ldots, s, Φ(xi,xi)<0\Phi(x_i, x_i) < 0 for i=s+1,…,s+ti = s + 1, \ldots, s + t and Φ(xi,xi)=0\Phi(x_i, x_i) = 0 for i=s+t+1,…,ni = s + t + 1, \ldots, n. This proves a), since we take for E+E^+ (resp. E−E^-) the subspace generated by x1,…,xsx_1, \ldots, x_s (resp. by xs+1,…,xs+tx_{s+1}, \ldots, x_{s+t}), and E0E^0 is then generated by xs+t+1,…,xnx_{s+t+1}, \ldots, x_n. We deduce b) from this by observing that Φ(xi,xi)\Phi(x_i, x_i) is of the form ρρ‾\rho \overline{\rho} (resp.

- ρρˉ) (ρ∈A∗)\rho \bar{\rho} )\ (\rho \in A^*) for i=1,…,si = 1, \ldots, s (resp. i=s+1,…,s+ti = s + 1, \ldots, s + t). To prove c), consider a subspace P of E such that the restriction of Φ\Phi to P is positive and non-degenerate; we then have P∩(E−+E0)={0}P \cap (E^- + E^0) = \{0\}, and the sum P+E−+E0P + E^- + E^0 is therefore direct; we conclude that dim⁡P≤dim⁡E+=s\dim P \leq \dim E^+ = s, and this proves c). Assertion d) follows at once from a).

Suppose finally that Φ\Phi is non-degenerate, put q=inf⁡(s,t)q = \inf (s, t), and show that q is the index of Φ\Phi. With the notations of b), the vectors ei+es+ie_i + e_{s+i} (resp. ei−es+ie_i - e_{s+i}) (i=1,…,qi = 1, \ldots, q) generate a totally isotropic subspace F (resp. F′F'). Since K is of characteristic 0, F+F′F + F' is generated by e1,…,eq,es+1,…,es+qe_1, \ldots, e_q, e_{s+1}, \ldots, e_{s+q} and is therefore non-isotropic. The restriction of Φ\Phi to the subspace H=(F+F′)0H = (F + F')^0 is then positive (or negative) and non-degenerate, and H contains therefore no isotropic vector ≠0\neq 0. Since F0F^0 contains F and H, and since dim⁡(F+H)=codim⁡F′=codim⁡F\dim(F + H) = \operatorname{codim} F' = \operatorname{codim} F, we have F0=F+HF^0 = F + H. Thus an isotropic vector z orthogonal to F is necessarily in F, because, in the direct sum F+HF + H, the component of z in H is isotropic. Consequently F is a maximal totally isotropic subspace, and this proves e).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.