Bourbaki

Proposition 4

Tag 0DM8, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DM8].

Algebra, chapter IX, § 7. Formes hermitiennes et corps ordonnés

Let u be a normal endomorphism of E. When A is equal to K(i) or to the quaternion field over K, there exists an orthonormal basis (for Φ) of E formed by eigenvectors of u. When A = K, u is semisimple and E is direct sum of stable subspaces for u, pairwise orthogonal, and of dimension 1 or 2.

First examine the case where A is commutative (A = K or A = K(i)). Then the subalgebra B = A[u, u*] of LA(E)\mathscr{L}_A(E) is commutative since u is normal; it is stable under the mapping φ→φ∗\varphi \to \varphi^* by virtue of formulas (32) and (33) of § 1, No. 8. The assertion concerning the case A = K then follows immediately from cor. 2 of th. 2. When A = K(i), this corollary also shows that E is direct sum of vector subspaces AxiAx_i (i=1,…,ni = 1, \ldots, n) of dimension 1, pairwise orthogonal and stable for u; if one puts ei=(Φ(xi,xi))−1/2xie_i = (\Phi(x_i, x_i))^{-1/2} x_i, (ei)(e_i) is the orthonormal basis sought.

When A is the quaternion field over K, it will suffice similarly to prove, by virtue of th. 2, that every minimal element of the set of subspaces ≠{0}\neq \{0\} of E stable for u and u∗u^* is of dimension 1. Now such a subspace V necessarily contains an eigenvector x≠0x \neq 0 of u (*), as is seen by observing that the quaternion field A contains K(i) as an algebraically closed subfield, and by restricting to K(i) the field of

(*) If E is a left vector space over a noncommutative field A, and u an endomorphism of E, one still says that a vector x≠0x \neq 0 of E is an eigenvector for u if there exists a∈Aa \in A such that u(x)=axu(x) = ax; the scalar a is then called an eigenvalue of u. One will note that, for every b≠0b \neq 0 in A, the vector bxbx is an eigenvector for u, and that the corresponding eigenvalue is bab−1bab^{-1}.

scalars of V. It remains therefore only to show that the eigenvector x of u is also an eigenvector of u*. Put u(x)=axu(x) = ax (a∈Aa \in A); one then has Φ(u(x),x)=aΦ(x,x)=Φ(x,x)a=Φ(x,a‾x)\Phi(u(x), x) = a\Phi(x, x) = \Phi(x, x)a = \Phi(x, \overline{a}x) since Φ(x,x)\Phi(x, x) belongs to the center of A, and on the other hand Φ(u(x),x)=Φ(x,u∗(x))\Phi(u(x), x) = \Phi(x, u^*(x)); it follows that one has Φ(x,u∗(x)−a‾x)=0\Phi(x, u^*(x) - \overline{a}x) = 0, and one can therefore write u∗(x)=a‾x+zu^*(x) = \overline{a}x + z, where z is a vector orthogonal to x. One therefore has

Φ(u∗(x),u∗(x))=a‾aΦ(x,x)+Φ(z,z)=Φ(u(x),u(x))+Φ(z,z). \Phi(u^*(x), u^*(x)) = \overline{a}a\Phi(x, x) + \Phi(z, z) = \Phi(u(x), u(x)) + \Phi(z, z).

Now, since u is normal, one has

Φ(u(x),u(x))=Φ(x,u∗u(x))=Φ(x,uu∗(x))=Φ(uu∗(x),x)=Φ(u∗(x),u∗(x)). \begin{align*} \Phi(u(x), u(x)) &= \Phi(x, u^*u(x)) = \Phi(x, uu^*(x)) \\ &= \Phi(uu^*(x), x) = \Phi(u^*(x), u^*(x)). \end{align*}

Consequently one has Φ(z,z)=0\Phi(z, z) = 0, which, by assumption, entails z=0z = 0 and u∗(x)=a‾xu^*(x) = \overline{a}x. QED.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.