Bourbaki

Proposition 6

Tag 0DMB, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DMB].

Algebra, chapter IX, § 7. Formes hermitiennes et corps ordonnés

a) Let Ψ\Psi be a hermitian form (resp. symmetric bilinear form if A=K\mathbf{A} = \mathbf{K} or A=K(i)\mathbf{A} = \mathbf{K}(i)) on EE. There exists a basis of EE which is orthonormal for Φ\Phi and orthogonal for Ψ\Psi.

b) Suppose A=K\mathbf{A} = \mathbf{K} or A=K(i)\mathbf{A} = \mathbf{K}(i), and let Ψ\Psi be an alternating bilinear form on EE. There exists a basis of EE which is orthonormal for Φ\Phi and with respect to which the matrix of Ψ\Psi is of the form

(0a100…0−a1000…0000a2…000−a20…0⋯⋯⋯⋯). \begin{pmatrix} 0 & a_1 & 0 & 0 \ldots 0 \\ -a_1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \ldots 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & a_2 \ldots 0 \\ 0 & 0 & -a_2 & 0 \ldots 0 \\ \cdots & \cdots & \cdots & \cdots \end{pmatrix}.

where the aia_i are ⩾0\geqslant 0 in K.

When Ψ\Psi is hermitian, our assertion follows at once from Prop. 5 and the canonical correspondence between hermitian forms on EE and hermitian endomorphisms for Φ\Phi. In the two other cases, let uu be the semilinear mapping of EE into itself defined at the beginning of this No. by the formula Ψ(x,y)=Φ(u(x),y)‾\Psi(x, y) = \overline{\Phi(u(x), y)}. Then u2u^2 is an A\mathbf{A}-linear mapping; when Ψ\Psi is symmetric (resp. alternating), one has u=u∗u = u^* (resp. u=−u∗u = -u^*), hence u2u^2 is hermitian; whence also

Φ(u2(x),x)=Φ(x,u2(x))‾=Φ(u∗(x),u(x))=Φ(u(x),u(x)) \Phi(u^2(x), x) = \overline{\Phi(x, u^2(x))} = \Phi(u^*(x), u(x)) = \Phi(u(x), u(x))
(resp. −Φ(u(x),u(x))-\Phi(u(x), u(x)));

this shows that the hermitian form (x,y)→Φ(u2(x),y)(x, y) \to \Phi(u^2(x), y) is positive (resp. negative). Apply then Theorem 2, and let VV be a minimal element of the family of the subspaces ≠{0}\neq \{0\} of EE stable for uu and for u∗u^*. Since u2u^2 is a hermitian endomorphism, VV contains a proper vector x≠0x \neq 0 of u2u^2; put u2(x)=axu^2(x) = ax, where a∈Ka \in \mathbf{K} (Prop. 5).

When Ψ\Psi is symmetric, the inequality Φ(u2(x),x)⩾0\Phi(u^2(x), x) \geqslant 0 shows that one has a⩾0a \geqslant 0. Put y=a1/2x+u(x)y = a^{1/2}x + u(x); one has u(y)=a1/2u(x)+ax=a1/2yu(y) = a^{1/2}u(x) + ax = a^{1/2}y, and AyAy is stable for uu and u∗=uu^* = u. If y=0y = 0, AxAx is stable for uu and u∗u^*; in all cases, VV is a subspace of dimension 1, and our conclusion follows at once from Theorem 2.

When Ψ\Psi is alternating, one has a⩽0a \leqslant 0; put

y=(−a)1/2x+u(x),z=(−a)1/2x−u(x). y = (-a)^{1/2}x + u(x), \quad z = (-a)^{1/2}x - u(x).

One has u(y)=−(−a)1/2z, u(z)=(−a)1/2yu(y) = -(-a)^{1/2}z, \ u(z) = (-a)^{1/2}y and

Φ(y,z)=−aΦ(x,x)−Φ(u(x),u(x))=−Φ(ax,x)+Φ(u2(x),x)=0. \Phi(y, z) = -a\Phi(x, x) - \Phi(u(x), u(x)) = -\Phi(ax, x) + \Phi(u^2(x), x) = 0.

If y=z=0y = z = 0, we have a=0a = 0 and u(x)=0u(x) = 0, hence AxAx is stable under uu and u∗u^*, VV is of dimension 1, and the matrix of the restriction of Ψ\Psi to VV is zero since Ψ\Psi is alternating. Otherwise, yy and zz are both ≠0\neq 0, they generate VV, and since they are orthogonal, VV is of dimension 2 and the matrix of the restriction of Ψ\Psi to VV is of the form (0b−b0)\begin{pmatrix} 0 & b \\ -b & 0 \end{pmatrix}. Finally, by virtue of the formula Ψ′(x′,y′)=Φ(u(x′),y′)‾\Psi'(x', y') = \overline{\Phi(u(x'), y')}, we have Ψ′(x′,y′)=0\Psi'(x', y') = 0 when x′x' and y′y' belong to two subspaces stable under uu and orthogonal for Φ\Phi. This proves the existence of an orthonormal basis of EE (for Φ\Phi) with respect to which the matrix of Ψ\Psi has the indicated form. Q.E.D.

Exercises. — 1) Suppose that the hypotheses at the beginning of § 7 are satisfied; let Φ\Phi be a positive Hermitian form on EE.

a) In order that Φ(x,x)Φ(y,y)=Φ(x,y)Φ(x,y)‾\Phi(x, x)\Phi(y, y) = \Phi(x, y)\overline{\Phi(x, y)}, it is necessary and sufficient that xx and yy be linearly dependent or that the plane generated by xx and yy be isotropic.

b) Suppose that, for every x∈Ex \in E, Φ(x,x)\Phi(x, x) is a square in KK. Now prove that for any two vectors x,yx, y of EE, we have

Φ(x+y,x+y)≤Φ(x,x)+Φ(y,y). \sqrt{\Phi(x + y, x + y)} \leq \sqrt{\Phi(x, x)} + \sqrt{\Phi(y, y)}.

If Φ\Phi is non-degenerate, the two members of this inequality can be equal only if αx+βy=0\alpha x + \beta y = 0, where α\alpha and β\beta are two elements of KK, not both zero and such that αβ≤0\alpha \beta \leq 0.

2) Suppose A=KA = K or A=K(i)A = K(i). Let XX be a Hermitian square matrix of order nn over AA, such that for every nonempty subset HH of {1,n}\{1, n\}, we have XH,H≥0X_{H, H} \geq 0 (notations of Proposition 3 of No. 1).

a) Let λ\lambda be an element >0> 0 of KK; now prove that the matrix X+λIX + \lambda I is positive non-degenerate (use Proposition 3 of No. 1, reasoning by induction on nn).

b) Deduce that the Hermitian matrix XX is positive.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.