Bourbaki

Lemma 1

Tag 0DNF, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DNF].

Algebra, chapter IX, § 9. Algèbres de Clifford

Let ff be an element of the dual E∗E^* of E. There exists one and only one linear mapping ifi_f of T(E) into itself such that

if(1)=0(4) i_f(1) = 0 \tag{4}
if∘ex+ex∘if=f(x).I(5) i_f \circ e_x + e_x \circ i_f = f(x).I \tag{5}
for every x∈Ex \in E (where I denotes the identity mapping). The mapping f→iff \to i_f of E∗E^* into L(T(E))\mathscr{L}(T(E)) is linear. We have if(Tn)⊂Tn−1i_f(T^n) \subset T^{n-1}, (if)2=0(i_f)^2 = 0, and if∘ig+ig∘if=0i_f \circ i_g + i_g \circ i_f = 0 for f,gf, g in E∗E^*. The mapping ifi_f is zero on the subalgebra of

T(E) generated by the kernel of f. The ideal I(Q) is stable under ifi_f; passing to the quotient, ifi_f therefore defines a linear mapping (still denoted by ifi_f) of C(Q)C(Q) into itself.

Indeed formula (5) can be written

if(x⊗u)=−x⊗if(u)+f(x)⋅u(x∈E, u∈T(E)). i_f(x \otimes u) = -x \otimes i_f(u) + f(x) \cdot u \quad (x \in E,\ u \in T(E)).

As (4) completely determines ifi_f on T0T^0, and since (6) determines ifi_f on TnT^n if its values on Tn−1T^{n-1} are known, the uniqueness of ifi_f is proved. On the other hand, for x∈Ex \in E and u∈Tn−1u \in T^{n-1}, the right-hand side of (6) is bilinear on E×Tn−1E \times T^{n-1}; this proves the existence of ifi_f by induction on nn (Chap. III, § 1, No. 2) and also proves, by induction on nn, that if(Tn)⊂Tn−1i_f(T^n) \subset T^{n-1}. If f=ag+bhf = ag + bh (a, b in A, g, h in E*) it is clear that aig+bihai_g + bi_h satisfies (4) and (5), hence is equal to ifi_f. We have

(if)2∘ex=−if∘ex∘if+f(x)if=ex∘(if)2 (i_f)^2 \circ e_x = -i_f \circ e_x \circ i_f + f(x)i_f = e_x \circ (i_f)^2

and, since (if)2(1)=0(i_f)^2(1) = 0, it follows by induction on nn that (if)2(i_f)^2 is zero on TnT^n. Replacing ff by f+gf + g, the relation (if)2=0(i_f)^2 = 0 gives if∘ig+ig∘if=0i_f \circ i_g + i_g \circ i_f = 0. An analogous reasoning by induction to the preceding ones shows that ifi_f is zero on the subalgebra generated by the kernel of ff. Finally (6) entails that the set of elements uu of I(Q)I(Q) such that if(u)∈I(Q)i_f(u) \in I(Q) is a left ideal of T(E)T(E); moreover, if u=(x⊗x−Q(x)⋅1)⊗νu = (x \otimes x - Q(x) \cdot 1) \otimes \nu (x∈E, ν∈T(E)x \in E,\ \nu \in T(E)), we have

if(u)=f(x)x⊗ν−x⊗if(x⊗ν)−Q(x)if(ν)=f(x)x⊗ν−f(x)x⊗ν+x⊗x⊗if(ν)−Q(x)if(ν)=(x⊗x−Q(x)⋅1)⊗if(ν); \begin{align*} i_f(u) &= f(x)x \otimes \nu - x \otimes i_f(x \otimes \nu) - Q(x)i_f(\nu) \\ &= f(x)x \otimes \nu - f(x)x \otimes \nu + x \otimes x \otimes i_f(\nu) - Q(x)i_f(\nu) \\ &= (x \otimes x - Q(x) \cdot 1) \otimes i_f(\nu); \end{align*}

therefore I(Q)I(Q) is stable under ifi_f, and the last assertion follows. QED.

Let F be a bilinear form on E; in the remainder of this paragraph we shall denote by ixFi_x^F (x∈Ex \in E) the mapping ifi_f corresponding to the linear form f:y→F(x,y)f : y \to F(x, y) on E.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.