Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 0DNI, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DNI].

Algebra, chapter IX, § 9. Algèbres de Clifford

Let Q and Q' be two quadratic forms and F a bilinear form on E such that Q′(x)=Q(x)+F(x,x)Q'(x) = Q(x) + F(x, x) for every x∈Ex \in E. The mapping λF\lambda_F maps the ideal I(Q′)I(Q') onto the ideal I(Q)I(Q), and defines an isomorphism (denoted by λF‾\overline{\lambda_F}) of the A-module C(Q′)C(Q') onto the A-module C(Q)C(Q).

Since λF\lambda_F is a bijection whose inverse bijection is λ−F\lambda_{-F} (Lemma 3), it suffices to prove the inclusion λF(I(Q′))⊂I(Q)\lambda_F(I(Q')) \subset I(Q). Since I(Q)I(Q) is a left ideal stable under ixFi_x^F (Lemma 1), (8) shows that the set of u∈T(E)u \in T(E) such that λF(u)∈I(Q)\lambda_F(u) \in I(Q) is a left ideal. It therefore suffices to prove that, whatever u∈T(E)u \in T(E) and x∈Ex \in E, we have λF(x⊗x⊗u−Q′(x)u)∈I(Q)\lambda_F(x \otimes x \otimes u - Q'(x)u) \in I(Q). Now, according to (8) and Lemma 1, we have

λF∘ex2=(ex+ixF)2∘λF=(ex2+F(x,x))∘λF, \lambda_F \circ e_x^2 = (e_x + i_x^F)^2 \circ \lambda_F = (e_x^2 + F(x, x)) \circ \lambda_F,
whence
λF(x⊗x⊗u−Q′(x)u)=(ex2+F(x,x)−Q′(x))∘λF(u)=(x⊗x−Q(x))⊗λF(u)∈I(Q). \begin{align*} \lambda_F(x \otimes x \otimes u - Q'(x)u) &= (e_x^2 + F(x, x) - Q'(x)) \circ \lambda_F(u) \\ &= (x \otimes x - Q(x)) \otimes \lambda_F(u) \in I(Q). \end{align*}

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.