Bourbaki

Corollary 4

Tag 0DNO, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DNO].

Algebra, chapter IX, § 9. Algèbres de Clifford

The hypotheses and notation being those of Cor. 3, suppose moreover that E1E_1 and E2E_2 are orthogonal, and transport to C(Q1)⊗C(Q2)C(Q_1) \otimes C(Q_2), by means of the bijection pp, the algebra structure of C(Q)C(Q). If aia_i and bib_i are even or odd elements of C(Qi)C(Q_i) (i=1, 2i = 1,\ 2), then a (a1⊗a2)(b1⊗b2)=ε(a1b1)⊗(a2b2)a\ (a_1 \otimes a_2)(b_1 \otimes b_2) = \varepsilon(a_1b_1) \otimes (a_2b_2), with ε=1\varepsilon = 1 unless a2a_2 and b1b_1 are odd, in which case ε=−1\varepsilon = -1.

It suffices indeed to prove that p2(a2)p1(b1)=εp1(b1)p2(a2)p_2(a_2)p_1(b_1) = \varepsilon p_1(b_1)p_2(a_2), and for this purpose we may suppose that p2(a2)p_2(a_2) (resp. p1(b1)p_1(b_1)) is a product x1…xhx_1 \ldots x_h (resp. y1…yky_1 \ldots y_k) of elements of ρQ(E2)\rho_Q(E_2) (resp. ρQ(E1)\rho_Q(E_1)). Since E1E_1 and E2E_2 are orthogonal, we have

xiyj+yjxi=Φ(xi,yj)=0, x_iy_j + y_jx_i = \Phi(x_i, y_j) = 0,

whence

x1…xhy1…yk=(−1)hky1…ykx1…xh. x_1 \ldots x_h y_1 \ldots y_k = (-1)^{hk} y_1 \ldots y_k x_1 \ldots x_h.

The conclusions of cor. 3 and 4 remain true if we omit the hypothesis that E1E_1 and E2E_2 are free modules (cf. exerc. 1).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.