Bourbaki

Proposition 4

Tag 0DNY, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DNY].

Algebra, chapter IX, § 9. Algèbres de Clifford

Let β\beta be the principal antiautomorphism of C(Q)C(Q) (n° 1). For every s∈G+s \in G^+, β(s)s\beta(s)s is a scalar. The mapping N:s→β(s)sN : s \to \beta(s)s is a homomorphism of G+G^+ into the multiplicative group A∗A^* of nonzero elements of AA.

Indeed, for s∈G+s \in G^+, one has sEs−1=EsEs^{-1} = E, whence β(s)−1Eβ(s)=E\beta(s)^{-1}E\beta(s) = E, which shows that β(s)∈G+\beta(s) \in G^+. Since sx=(φ(s).x)ssx = (\varphi(s).x)s for all x∈Ex \in E, one has xβ(s)=β(sx)=β(s)(φ(s).x)x\beta(s) = \beta(sx) = \beta(s)(\varphi(s).x), and consequently β(s)sx=β(s)(φ(s).x)s=xβ(s)s\beta(s)sx = \beta(s)(\varphi(s).x)s = x\beta(s)s, which implies that β(s)s\beta(s)s belongs to the center of C(Q)C(Q). Since, moreover, β(s)s\beta(s)s belongs to C+(Q)C^+(Q), β(s)s\beta(s)s is a scalar (Theorem 2 and 3). Finally one has β(st)st=β(t)β(s)st=β(s)sβ(t)t\beta(st)st = \beta(t)\beta(s)st = \beta(s)s\beta(t)t, that is to say N(st)=N(s)N(t)N(st) = N(s)N(t) for s,ts, t in G+G^+. QED.

The scalar N(s)=β(s)sN(s) = \beta(s)s (s∈G+s \in G^+) is called the spinor norm of ss. We denote by G0+G_0^+ and call the reduced Clifford group the kernel of the homomorphism NN. The image φ(G0+)\varphi(G_0^+) is denoted by O0+(Q)O_0^+(Q) and is called the reduced orthogonal group of QQ. Since the kernel of the restriction of φ\varphi to G+G^+ is the set of even and invertible elements of the center of C(Q)C(Q) (Theorem 4) and is therefore identified with A∗A^* (Theorem 2 and 3), φ(G+)/O0+(Q)\varphi(G^+)/O_0^+(Q) is isomorphic to G+/A∗G0+G^+/A^*G_0^+, and hence also to N(G+)/N(A∗)N(G^+)/N(A^*), and in particular commutative. It is clear that N(A∗)N(A^*) is the subgroup (A∗)2(A^*)^2 of squares of elements of A∗A^*. If QQ is of index >0> 0, there exist, whatever a∈A∗a \in A^* may be, two elements xx and yy of EE such that Q(x)=aQ(x) = a and Q(y)=1Q(y) = 1 (§ 4, No. 2, Proposition 4) ; since xy∈G+xy \in G^+ and N(xy)=Q(x)Q(y)=aN(xy) = Q(x)Q(y) = a, this shows that N(G+)=A∗N(G^+) = A^*, and hence that φ(G+)/O0+(Q)\varphi(G^+)/O_0^+(Q) is isomorphic to A∗/(A∗)2A^*/(A^*)^2.

Exercices. — ¶ 1) Prove Cor. 3 and 4 of Theorem 1 of No. 3 when E1E_1 and E2E_2 are any two supplementary submodules in EE. (First establish Cor. 4: now prove for this purpose that the tensor product C(Q1)⊗C(Q2)C(Q_1) \otimes C(Q_2) is endowed with an algebra structure by the sign convention made in the statement of Cor. 4, and that this algebra SS is solution of the same universal mapping problem as C(Q)C(Q); for this purpose, one will consider, for every linear mapping ff of EE into an algebra DD over AA such that (f(x))2=Q(x).1(f(x))^2 = Q(x).1, the homomorphism fˉi\bar{f}_i of C(Qi)C(Q_i) into DD such that fˉi(1)=1\bar{f}_i(1) = 1, fˉi(ρQi(xi))=f(xi)\bar{f}_i(\rho_{Q_i}(x_i)) = f(x_i) for xi∈Eix_i \in E_i (i=1,2i = 1, 2) and one will prove that there exists a homomorphism fˉ\bar{f} of the algebra SS into DD such that

fˉ(z1⊗z2)=fˉ1(z1)fˉ2(z2) \bar{f}(z_1 \otimes z_2) = \bar{f}_1(z_1)\bar{f}_2(z_2)
for zi∈C(Qi)z_i \in C(Q_i) (i=1,2i = 1, 2). To prove then Cor. 3, consider the quadratic form Q′Q' external direct sum of Q1Q_1 and Q2Q_2 (§ 3, No. 4), and remark that one has Q′(x)=Q(x)+F(x,x)Q'(x) = Q(x) + F(x, x), FF being the bilinear form defined by F(x1+x2,y1+y2)=−Φ(x1,y2)F(x_1 + x_2, y_1 + y_2) = -\Phi(x_1, y_2) for xi,yix_i, y_i in EiE_i (i=1,2i = 1, 2) ; use then Prop. 3.)

¶ 2) Suppose that EE be direct sum of two orthogonal submodules E1,E2E_1, E_2 and denote by QiQ_i the restriction of QQ to EiE_i (i=1,2i = 1, 2);

on suppose en outre qu’il existe u∈C+(Q2)u \in C^+(Q_2) tel que u2=a.1u^2 = a . 1, aa étant invér sible dans AA, et que uρQ2(x2)=−ρQ2(x2)u \rho_{Q_2}(x_2) = -\rho_{Q_2}(x_2) pour tout x2∈E2x_2 \in E_2. Now prove qu’il existe un isomorphisme φ\varphi de C(Q)C(Q) sur le produit tensoriel C(aQ1)⊗C(Q2)C(aQ_1) \otimes C(Q_2) (tel qu’il est défini dans le chap. III, § 3, n° 1), ayant la propriété que pour tout x=x1+x2x = x_1 + x_2 (xi∈Ei,i=1,2x_i \in E_i, i = 1, 2), on a

φ(ρQ(x))=ρaQ1(x1)⊗u−1+1⊗ρQ2(x2). \varphi(\rho_Q(x)) = \rho_{aQ_1}(x_1) \otimes u^{-1} + 1 \otimes \rho_{Q_2}(x_2).
(Proving the existence of the homomorphism φ\varphi as a consequence of the universal property of C(Q)C(Q). On the other hand, there is a homomorphism g1g_1 of C(aQ1)C(aQ_1) into C(Q)C(Q) such that g1(ρaQ1(x1))=h2(u)ρQ1(x1)g_1(\rho_{aQ_1}(x_1)) = h_2(u)\rho_{Q_1}(x_1), where h2h_2 denotes the canonical homomorphism of C(Q2)C(Q_2) into C(Q)C(Q); remark then that g1(z1)g_1(z_1) and h2(z2)h_2(z_2) commute for z1∈C(aQ1)z_1 \in C(aQ_1) and z2∈C(Q2)z_2 \in C(Q_2), and deduce the existence of a reciprocal homomorphism to φ\varphi.)

In what case does this result apply when AA is a field of characteristic ≠2\neq 2 (use Remark 2 following Cor. of Th. 2)?

3) a) With the notation of No. 2, let xix_i (1⩽i⩽n1 \leqslant i \leqslant n) be elements of EE such that f(xi)=0f(x_i) = 0; show that we have if(x1⊗x2⊗⋯⊗xn)=0i_f(x_1 \otimes x_2 \otimes \cdots \otimes x_n) = 0. In particular, if FF is a bilinear form on EE such that F(xi,xj)=0F(x_i, x_j) = 0 for i>ji > j, we have iFE(x2⊗x3⊗⋯⊗xn)=0i_F^E(x_2 \otimes x_3 \otimes \cdots \otimes x_n) = 0.

b) With the notation of Prop. 3 of No. 3, let xix_i (1⩽i⩽n1 \leqslant i \leqslant n) be elements of EE such that F(xi,xj)=0F(x_i, x_j) = 0 for i>ji > j. Show that we have λ‾F(ρQ′(x1)…ρQ′(xn))=ρQ(x1)…ρQ(xn)\overline{\lambda}_F(\rho_{Q'}(x_1) \ldots \rho_{Q'}(x_n)) = \rho_Q(x_1) \ldots \rho_Q(x_n) (use a) and formula (10) of No. 2).

c) We suppose that AA is a field of characteristic ≠2\neq 2; for every quadratic form QQ on EE, let μQ\mu_Q be the mapping λ‾F\overline{\lambda}_F of C(Q)C(Q) onto ∧E\wedge E corresponding to F(x,y)=12Φ(x,y)F(x, y) = \frac{1}{2} \Phi(x, y). Now prove that if the vectors xix_i (1⩽i⩽n1 \leqslant i \leqslant n) are pairwise orthogonal, one has

μQ(x1x2…xn)=x1∧x2∧…∧xn. \mu_Q(x_1 x_2 \ldots x_n) = x_1 \wedge x_2 \wedge \ldots \wedge x_n.
Deduce that if yiy_i (1⩽i⩽n1 \leqslant i \leqslant n) are nn arbitrary vectors, one has
n!  μQ−1(y1∧y2∧…∧yn)=∑σ∈Snεσyσ(1)yσ(2)⋯yσ(n). n! \; \mu_Q^{-1}(y_1 \wedge y_2 \wedge \ldots \wedge y_n) = \sum_{\sigma \in S_n} \varepsilon_\sigma y_{\sigma(1)} y_{\sigma(2)} \cdots y_{\sigma(n)}.

4) Let ChC_h be the submodule of C(Q)C(Q) generated by the products of kk elements of ρQ(E)\rho_Q(E) for 0⩽k⩽h0 \leqslant k \leqslant h. Show that the mapping

(x1,…,xh)→ρQ(x1)…ρQ(xh) (x_1, \ldots, x_h) \to \rho_Q(x_1) \ldots \rho_Q(x_h)
defines, on passing to the quotients, an alternating multilinear mapping of EhE^h into Ch/Ch−1C_h/C_{h-1}. One deduces from this a linear mapping πh\pi_h of ∧hE\wedge^h E into Ch/Ch−1C_h/C_{h-1}; show that πh\pi_h is an isomorphism when EE is a free module. If ff is an orthogonal transform, one has C(f)∘πh=πh∘(∧hf)C(f) \circ \pi_h = \pi_h \circ (\wedge^h f). When AA is a field of characteristic ≠2\neq 2, show that πh\pi_h is the restriction of the inverse mapping μQ−1\mu_Q^{-1} defined in exerc. 3 c).

5) With the notation of No. 2, consider the mapping ifi_f of ∧E\wedge E into itself. Show that one has

if(x1∧…∧xh)=∑i=1h(−1)i−1f(xi)(x1∧…∧xi−1∧xi+1∧…∧xh) i_f(x_1 \wedge \ldots \wedge x_h) = \sum_{i=1}^{h} (-1)^{i-1} f(x_i) (x_1 \wedge \ldots \wedge x_{i-1} \wedge x_{i+1} \wedge \ldots \wedge x_h)

and deduce that ifi_f is none other than the right interior product z→z⌞fz \to z \llcorner f (chap. III, § 8, No. 4, def. 2).

6) Show that, if EE admits an orthogonal basis (e1,e2)(e_1, e_2) for Q, and if we put αi=Q(ei)\alpha_i = Q(e_i) (i=1,2i = 1, 2), the algebra C(Q)C(Q) is isomorphic to the quaternion algebra over AA corresponding to the pair (α1,α2)(\alpha_1, \alpha_2).

7) Let AA be a maximal ordered field, EE a vector space of even dimension 2r2r over AA, and QQ a non-degenerate quadratic form on EE, positive or negative. Show that, if QQ is positive, C(Q)C(Q) is isomorphic to a matrix algebra over AA when r(r−1)/2r(r-1)/2 is even, and to a matrix algebra over the quaternion algebra over AA when r(r−1)/2r(r-1)/2 is odd. If QQ is negative, C(Q)C(Q) is isomorphic to a matrix algebra over AA when r(r+1)/2r(r+1)/2 is even, and to a matrix algebra over the quaternion algebra over AA when r(r+1)/2r(r+1)/2 is odd (use exerc. 2 and 6). What is the structure of C+(Q)C^+(Q) in these different cases?

8) Let AA be the ring Z/(4)\mathbf{Z}/(4), EE the AA-module Z/(2)\mathbf{Z}/(2); if we put Q(0) = 0, Q(u) = 1 for the unique element u≠0u \neq 0 of EE, QQ is a quadratic form on EE. Show that the AA-modules C(Q)C(Q) and ∧E\wedge E are not isomorphic (it will be proved that C(Q)C(Q) is isomorphic to the direct sum of two modules isomorphic to E).

¶ 9) We suppose that AA is a field of characteristic 2, EE a vector space of finite dimension 2r2r, QQ a non-degenerate quadratic form on EE.

a) Let (ei)(e_i) be a symplectic basis (§5,§ 5, No. 1) of EE for the alternating bilinear form Φ\Phi associated with Q. Show that the element

z=e1e2+e3e4+⋯+e2r−1e2r z = e_1 e_2 + e_3 e_4 + \cdots + e_{2r-1} e_{2r}

of C+(Q)C^+(Q) forms, together with the unit element, a basis of the center Z of C+(Q)C^+(Q). In order that Z be the direct sum of two fields, it is necessary and sufficient that the element

Δ(Q)=Q(e1)Q(e2)+Q(e3)Q(e4)+⋯+Q(e2r−1)Q(e2r) \Delta(Q) = Q(e_1) Q(e_2) + Q(e_3) Q(e_4) + \cdots + Q(e_{2r-1}) Q(e_{2r})

(called the pseudo-discriminant of Q with respect to the symplectic basis (ei)(e_i)) be of the form λ2+λ\lambda^2 + \lambda, with λ∈A\lambda \in A.

b) Let uu be a similarity for Φ\Phi (§6,§ 6, No. 5) with multiplier μ(u)\mu(u), and let Q1(x)=Q(u(x))Q_1(x) = Q(u(x)). Put

u(e2i−1)=∑j=1raije2j−1+∑j=1rbije2j, u(e_{2i-1}) = \sum_{j=1}^{r} a_{ij} e_{2j-1} + \sum_{j=1}^{r} b_{ij} e_{2j},
u(e2i)=∑j=1rcije2j−1+∑j=1rdije2j, u(e_{2i}) = \sum_{j=1}^{r} c_{ij} e_{2j-1} + \sum_{j=1}^{r} d_{ij} e_{2j},

and Q(e2i−1)=αi,Q(e2i)=βiQ(e_{2i-1}) = \alpha_i, Q(e_{2i}) = \beta_i (1≤i≤r1 \leq i \leq r). Now prove that

Δ(Q1)=(μ(u))2Δ(Q)+(D(u))2+μ(u)D(u) \Delta(Q_1) = (\mu(u))^2 \Delta(Q) + (\mathrm{D}(u))^2 + \mu(u)\mathrm{D}(u)
where
D(u)=∑i,j(αjaijcij+βjbijdij+bijcij) \mathrm{D}(u) = \sum_{i,j} (\alpha_j a_{ij} c_{ij} + \beta_j b_{ij} d_{ij} + b_{ij} c_{ij})
(Dickson invariant of uu with respect to the basis (ei)(e_i)). (Notice that the element
(μ(u))−1(u(e1)u(e2)+u(e3)u(e4)+⋯+u(e2r−1)u(e2r)) (\mu(u))^{-1}(u(e_1)u(e_2) + u(e_3)u(e_4) + \cdots + u(e_{2r-1})u(e_{2r}))
belongs to Z\mathbf{Z}.) In order that uu be a similarity for QQ (§4§ 4, Exercise 9) with multiplier μ(u)\mu(u), it is necessary and sufficient that D(u)=0\mathrm{D}(u) = 0 or D(u)=μ(u)\mathrm{D}(u) = \mu(u); the similarities for QQ such that D(u)=0\mathrm{D}(u) = 0 are called direct.

c) Now prove that, if φ\varphi is a similarity for Φ\Phi, uu a similarity for QQ, one has

D(uφ)=μ(φ)D(u)+μ(u)D(φ) \mathrm{D}(u\varphi) = \mu(\varphi)\mathrm{D}(u) + \mu(u)\mathrm{D}(\varphi)
(consider the Dickson invariant of φ\varphi with respect to the symplectic basis formed by the u(e2i−1)u(e_{2i-1}) and (μ(u))−1u(e2i)(\mu(u))^{-1}u(e_{2i}) for 1≤i≤r1 \leq i \leq r). Deduce that the direct similarities for QQ form a normal subgroup of index 2 in the group of similarities for QQ.

d) If uu is the symmetry with respect to the hyperplane orthogonal to a nonsingular vector in EE, now prove that D(u)=1\mathrm{D}(u) = 1. Deduce that the group φ(G+)\varphi(G^+) (notations of No. 5) is the group SO(Q)\mathbf{SO}(Q) defined in Exercise 28 c) of §6§ 6.

e) Let u∈O(Q)u \in \mathbf{O}(Q), and suppose Λ\Lambda is algebraically closed. Show that, in order that u∈SO(Q)u \in \mathbf{SO}(Q), it is necessary and sufficient that the number of elementary divisors of the module EuE_u be pair. (With the notations of Exercise 15 of §5§ 5, remark first that if p,qp, q are two distinct irreducible factors of the minimal polynomial of uu, the number of indecomposable submodules of which G(p,q)G(p, q) is direct sum is equal to the number of indecomposable submodules of which G(q,p)G(q, p) is direct sum. Remark on the other hand that G(p,p)={0}G(p, p) = \{0\} unless for p=X−1p = X - 1. Prove finally that one can restrict oneself to the case where EuE_u is equal to G(p,p)G(p, p) (with p=X−1p = X - 1) and is indecomposable. There is then a symplectic basis (ei)(e_i) of EE such that e1,e3,…,e2k−1e_1, e_3, \ldots, e_{2k-1} form a basis of (p(u))2r−k(E)(p(u))^{2r-k}(E) for 1≤k≤r1 \leq k \leq r; show that e1,e3,…,e2r−3e_1, e_3, \ldots, e_{2r-3} are singular vectors, and conclude that D(u)=1\mathrm{D}(u) = 1.)

§10§ 10 We suppose that AA is a field, EE a finite-dimensional vector space, QQ a degenerate quadratic form on EE; let MM be a supplementary subspace of E0E^0 in EE, BB the Clifford algebra (semisimple) of the restriction of QQ to MM.

a) We suppose first that AA is of characteristic ≠2\neq 2. Let LL be the Clifford algebra of the restriction of QQ to E0E^0 (isomorphic to ∧E0\wedge E^0), R0\mathscr{R}_0 its radical (ideal generated in LL by E0E^0, and of codimension 1 in LL); show that the radical R\mathscr{R} of C(Q)C(Q) is obtained (up to an isomorphism) by defining the algebra structure on B⊗AR0B \otimes_A \mathscr{R}_0 as in Cor. 4 of Theorem 1, that C(Q)/RC(Q)/\mathscr{R} is isomorphic to BB and C(Q)C(Q) is direct sum of BB and R\mathscr{R}.

b) Suppose that A has characteristic 2. Let F be the subspace of E⁰ formed by the singular vectors x∈E0x \in E^0, and let N be a supplementary subspace of F with respect to E⁰. If (ai)1≤i≤d(a_i)_{1 \leq i \leq d} is a basis of N, and Q(ai)=αi(a_i) = \alpha_i, the elements αi1/2\alpha_i^{1/2}, in an algebraic closure of A, are linearly independent over A. Let (αi1/2)1≤i≤e(\alpha_i^{1/2})_{1 \leq i \leq e} be a 2-basis of the field A1=A(α11/2,…,αd1/2)A_1 = A(\alpha_1^{1/2}, \ldots, \alpha_d^{1/2}) over A (chap. V, § 8, exerc. 1), and let h=dim⁡Fh = \dim F. If B₁ is the central simple algebra B⊗AA1B \otimes_A A_1, now prove that C(Q) is isomorphic to the algebra B1⊗A1L1B_1 \otimes_{A_1} L_1, where L1L_1 is the exterior algebra of a vector space of dimension h+d−eh + d - e over A1A_1. If R1R_1 is the radical of L1L_1 (of codimension 1 (over A1A_1) in L1L_1), the radical RR of C(Q) is isomorphic to the algebra B1⊗A1R1B_1 \otimes_{A_1} R_1, C(Q)/RC(Q)/R is isomorphic to B1B_1, and C(Q) is a direct sum of B1B_1 and RR.

c) The hypotheses being those of b), suppose in addition that h=0h = 0, d=1,e=0d = 1, e = 0 (which implies that dim M is even). If Q0Q_0 is the restriction of Q to M, now prove that C+(Q)C^+(Q) is isomorphic to C(Q0)C(Q_0).

¶ 11) a) With the hypotheses and notations of No. 5, now prove that N(G+)N(G^+) is the subgroup of A∗A^* generated by the products Q(x)Q(y)Q(x)Q(y), where xx and yy run through the set of non-isotropic vectors of E. (Reduce to the case A≠F2A \neq \mathbf{F}_2; use prop. 5 and exerc. 28 c) of § 6, as well as exerc. 9 d) of § 9.) Case where Q is of index ≥1\geq 1.

b) Suppose in addition that A≠F2A \neq \mathbf{F}_2, that E is of dimension n≥2n \geq 2 and that Q is of index >0> 0. Now prove that O0+(Q)O_0^+(Q) is the commutator group of the group O(Q)O(Q). (Reduce to the case n=2n = 2, using exerc. 17 c) and 28 e) of § 6.)

c) Retain the hypotheses of b), and suppose in addition that A has characteristic ≠2\neq 2 and that E is of even dimension. For the automorphism x→−xx \to -x of E to belong to O0+(Q)O_0^+(Q) it is necessary and sufficient that the discriminant of Q (with respect to any basis of E) be a square.

¶ 12) a) Let aa be an invertible element of A; now prove that there exists one and only one isomorphism θa\theta_a of C+(Q)C^+(Q) onto C+(aQ)C^+(aQ) such that

θa(ρ(x)ρ(y))=a−1ρ1(x)ρ1(y) \theta_a(\rho(x)\rho(y)) = a^{-1}\rho_1(x)\rho_1(y)

for all x,yx, y in E (ρ\rho and ρ1\rho_1 denoting the canonical mappings of E into C(Q)C(Q) and C(aQ)C(aQ) respectively). Deduce that if A is a field of characteristic ≠2\neq 2, E a vector space of odd dimension and Q a non-degenerate quadratic form, C(Q)C(Q) and C(aQ)C(aQ) are isomorphic (cf. exerc. 7).

b) Suppose that AA be a field, EE a vector space of even dimension 2r>02r > 0, QQ a non-degenerate quadratic form. Let uu be a similitude relative to QQ; prove that there exists one and only one AA-automorphism uˉ\bar{u} of the algebra C+(Q)C^+(Q) such that for 1≤h≤r1 \leq h \leq r and xi∈Ex_i \in E (1≤i≤2h1 \leq i \leq 2h), one has

uˉ(x1x2…x2h)=μ−hu(x1)u(x2)…u(x2h) \bar{u}(x_1x_2 \ldots x_{2h}) = \mu^{-h}u(x_1)u(x_2) \ldots u(x_{2h})

where μ\mu denotes the multiplier of uu. For uˉ\bar{u} to be an inner automorphism, it is necessary and sufficient that uu be a direct similitude (§ 6, No. 5 and § 9, Exercise 9 b)). Suppose in addition that r≥2r \geq 2; then, for uˉ\bar{u} to be the identity, it is necessary and sufficient that uu be a homothety.

Prove that the automorphism uˉ\bar{u} of C+(Q)C^+(Q) is the restriction to C+(Q)C^+(Q) of an inner automorphism of C(Q)C(Q).

¶ 13) Suppose that AA be a field of characteristic ≠2\neq 2, EE a vector space of even dimension 2r>02r > 0, QQ a non-degenerate quadratic form. We denote by EhE_h the inverse image of ∧hE\wedge^h E by the isomorphism μQ\mu_Q of Exercise 3 c), so that EhE_h is the subspace of C(Q)C(Q) generated by the products x1x2…xhx_1 x_2 \ldots x_h, where the xix_i (1≤i≤h1 \leq i \leq h) are pairwise orthogonal.

a) Let α\alpha be an element of AA, ss an element of E2E_2. Prove that, if (α+s)2∈A(\alpha + s)^2 \in A, either s=0s = 0, or α=0\alpha = 0 and s=xys = xy, where xx and yy are two orthogonal vectors. (Remark that if t=μQ(α+s)t = \mu_Q(\alpha + s), t∧tt \wedge t necessarily belongs to A+∧2EA + \wedge^2 E, by expressing ss with the aid of an orthogonal basis of EE; deduce that one necessarily has t=β+x∧yt = \beta + x \wedge y with β∈A\beta \in A, x,yx, y in EE, using § 5, No. 1, Cor. 2 of Theorem 1).

b) Let (x,y),(u,v)(x, y), (u, v) be two pairs of orthogonal non-isotropic vectors in EE, PxyP_{xy} and PuvP_{uv} the planes Ax+Ay,Au+AvAx + Ay, Au + Av respectively. In order that one have (xy)(uv)=−(uv)(xy)(xy)(uv) = -(uv)(xy) in C(Q)C(Q), it is necessary and sufficient that Pxy+PuvP_{xy} + P_{uv} be a non-isotropic subspace of dimension 3, in which PxyP_{xy} and PuvP_{uv} are weakly orthogonal (§ 3, exerc. 11).

c) Let gg be an AA-automorphism of C+(Q)C^+(Q) transforming E2E_2 into itself; prove that there exists a similitude uu relative to QQ such that g=uˉg = \bar{u} (exerc. 12 b)). (Let (ei)1≤i≤2r(e_i)_{1 \leq i \leq 2r} be an orthogonal basis of EE; using a and b), prove that there exists an orthogonal basis (xi)(x_i) of EE such that g(e1ei)=x1xig(e_1 e_i) = x_1 x_i for 2≤i≤2r2 \leq i \leq 2r.

14) Suppose that AA is a field of characteristic ≠2\neq 2, EE a vector space of dimension nn over AA, QQ and Q1Q_1 two non-degenerate quadratic forms on EE; let Δ~\tilde{\Delta} (resp. Δ~1\tilde{\Delta}_1) be the class of the discriminant Δ\Delta of QQ (resp. of the discriminant Δ1\Delta_1 of Q1Q_1) with respect to a basis of EE, in the group A∗/(A∗)2A^*/(A^*)^2, a class which does not depend on the basis chosen in EE. Suppose that n=2n = 2.

a) Prove that if Δ~=Δ~1\tilde{\Delta} = \tilde{\Delta}_1 and if the Clifford algebras C(Q)C(Q) and C(Q1)C(Q_1) are isomorphic, QQ and Q1Q_1 are equivalent (consider on C(Q)C(Q) the quadratic form z↦zzˉz \mapsto z \bar{z}, where z↦zˉz \mapsto \bar{z} is the unique involutive antiautomorphism of C(Q)C(Q) whose set of invariants is the center of C(Q)C(Q) (cf. exerc. 6 and chap. VIII, § 11, exerc. 5 e)); apply the Witt theorem).

(b) In order that C(Q)C(Q) be isomorphic to the matrix algebra M2(A)\mathbf{M}_2(A) it is necessary and sufficient that, for at least one x≠0x \neq 0 in EE, there exist y,zy, z in EE such that Q(x)+Q(y)Q(z)=0Q(x) + Q(y)Q(z) = 0; if this is so, this property is true for every x≠0x \neq 0 in EE.

¶ 15) We retain the general notation and hypotheses of Exercise 14, but suppose n=3n = 3.

(a) Now prove that C+(Q)C^+(Q) is isomorphic to a quaternion algebra over AA and that β\beta is the antiautomorphism z↦zˉz \mapsto \bar{z} of this algebra whose set of invariants is the center of C+(Q)C^+(Q); if PP is the subspace of C+(Q)C^+(Q) formed by the pure quaternions (that is, such that z=−zˉz = -\bar{z}; chap. VIII, § 11, Exercise 6), the restriction to PP of the quadratic form z↦zzˉz \mapsto z \bar{z} is equivalent to λQ\lambda Q, where λ∈A\lambda \in A. Deduce that, in order that C+(Q)C^+(Q) be a field, it is necessary and sufficient that QQ have index 0.

(b) Now prove that if Δ~=Δ~1\tilde{\Delta} = \tilde{\Delta}_1 and if the Clifford algebras C(Q)C(Q) and C(Q1)C(Q_1) are isomorphic, QQ and Q1Q_1 are equivalent. (Consider first the case where −Δ-\Delta is a square in KK, and show that in this case C+(Q)C^+(Q) and C+(Q1)C^+(Q_1) are isomorphic; then reason as in Exercise 14 a), using a) and Exercise 6 of chap. VIII, § 11. In the general case, use Exercise 12 a))a)).

(c) Now prove that the special Clifford group G+G^+ (for the form QQ) is identical with the group of invertible elements of C+(Q)C^+(Q). (If (e1,e2,e3)(e_1, e_2, e_3) is an orthogonal basis of EE, and if j=e1e2e3j = e_1 e_2 e_3 in C(Q)C(Q), observe that x→xjx \to xj is an isomorphism of vector spaces of EE onto PP).

(d) Deduce from a) and c) that if QQ has index 1, the group of rotations O+(Q)O^+(Q) is isomorphic to the projective group PGL2(A)\mathbf{PGL}_2(A) (chap. II, 2e éd., App. III, No. 6).

¶ 16) We retain the general hypotheses and notation of Exercise 14, but suppose n=4n = 4.

a) Give an example where Δ~=Δ~1\tilde{\Delta} = \tilde{\Delta}_1 and where C(Q)C(Q) and C(Q1)C(Q_1) are isomorphic, but where QQ and Q1Q_1 are not equivalent (cf. exerc. 7).

b) Let (ei)1≤i≤4(e_i)_{1 \leq i \leq 4} be an orthogonal basis of EE for QQ, Q0Q_0 the restriction of QQ to the hyperplane H=Ae1+Ae2+Ae3H = Ae_1 + Ae_2 + Ae_3. Now prove that, if ZZ is the center of C+(Q)C^+(Q), the algebra C+(Q)C^+(Q) is isomorphic to the tensor product Z⊗AC+(Q0)Z \otimes_A C^+(Q_0). For all z∈C+(Q)z \in C^+(Q), one has β(z)z∈Z\beta(z)z \in Z; for zz to belong to the special Clifford group G+G^+, it is necessary and sufficient that zz be invertible and that β(z)z∈A.1\beta(z)z \in A.1. Deduce that the group O0+(Q)O_0^+(Q) is isomorphic to the quotient by {1,−1}\{1, -1\} of the group of elements z∈Z⊗AC+(Q0)z \in Z \otimes_A C^+(Q_0) such that β(z)z=1\beta(z)z = 1.

c) Assume that Δ\Delta is not a square in AA (which implies, by virtue of Witt's theorem, that the index of QQ is 0 or 1). If Q0′Q_0' is the quadratic form obtained from Q0Q_0 by extension to A′=A(Δ)A' = A(\sqrt{\Delta}) of the field of scalars, deduce from b) that O0+(Q)O_0^+(Q) is isomorphic to O0+(Q0′)O_0^+(Q_0'). In particular, if QQ has index 1, O0+(Q)O_0^+(Q) is the group of commutators of O(Q)O(Q) and is isomorphic to PSL2(A′)\mathbf{PSL}_2(A') (cf. exerc. 15 dd) and chap. III, § 7, exerc. 8).

d) We suppose that Δ\Delta is a square in AA (which implies, by virtue of Witt’s theorem, that QQ is of index 0 or 2) and that Q(e4)=1Q(e_4) = 1. If we put j=e1e2e3j = e_1 e_2 e_3, every x∈Ex \in E can be written in one and only one way x=αe4+jzx = \alpha e_4 + jz, where α∈A\alpha \in A and zz is a pure quaternion (Exercise 15 aa)) in L=C+(Q0)L = C^+(Q_0); if we put ψ(x)=α+z\psi(x) = \alpha + z, ψ\psi is an isomorphism of vector spaces from EE onto LL. Let Z=Ac′+Ac′′Z = Ac' + Ac'', where c′c' and c′′c'' are the two orthogonal idempotents in ZZ; every invertible element s∈C+(Q)s \in C^+(Q) can be written in one and only one way s=uc′+vc′′s = uc' + vc'', where uu and vv belong to LL; for ss to belong to the special Clifford group G+G^+, it is necessary and sufficient that uuˉ=vvˉu \bar{u} = v \bar{v}, and we then have ψ(sxs−1)=uψ(x)v−1\psi(sxs^{-1}) = u \psi(x) v^{-1} for every x∈Ex \in E. Deduce that the quotient of O0+(Q)O_0^+(Q) by its center (which is a group with 2 elements, cf. Exercise 11 cc)) is isomorphic to the product O0+(Q0)×O0+(Q0)O_0^+(Q_0) \times O_0^+(Q_0); in particular, if QQ is of index 2, this quotient group is isomorphic to PSL2(A)×PSL2(A)\mathbf{PSL}_2(A) \times \mathbf{PSL}_2(A).

17) Let K be a commutative field of characteristic ≠2\neq 2, AA the field K(Xn)n∈NK(X_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} of rational fractions over K, with respect to a countable family of indeterminates (Chapter IV, § 3, No. 1). Let E be a vector space over A, having a countable basis (en)n∈N(e_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}}, and let Φ\Phi be a symmetric bilinear form on E, for which (en)(e_n) is an orthogonal basis and such that Φ(en,en)=Xn\Phi(e_n, e_n) = X_n for every n∈Nn \in \mathbf{N}. If we put Q(x)=Φ(x,x)Q(x) = \Phi(x, x), show that the Clifford algebra C(Q) is a field (cf. Chapter VIII, § 12, Exercise 14).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.