Library / Algebra / Chapter X / § 3
Proposition 4
Tag 0DU0, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DU0].
Algebra, chapter X, § 3. Résolutions
L ( f ) : L ( M ) → L ( N ) L(f) : L(M) \to L(N) L ( f ) : L ( M ) → L ( N ) is a morphism of complexes of a-modules; one has p M ∘ L ( f ) = f ∘ p N p_M \circ L(f) = f \circ p_N p M ∘ L ( f ) = f ∘ p N .
It is a matter of proving, for every integer n > 0 n > 0 n > 0 , the formula
d n N ∘ L n ( f ) = L n − 1 ( f ) ∘ d n M .
d_n^N \circ L_n(f) = L_{n-1}(f) \circ d_n^M .
d n N ∘ L n ( f ) = L n − 1 ( f ) ∘ d n M .
One has first
d 1 N ∘ L 1 ( f ) = i N ∘ p Z 0 ( N ) ∘ L 0 ( Z 0 ( f ) ) (by (3) and (6)) = i N ∘ Z 0 ( f ) ∘ p Z 0 ( M ) (by (4)) = L 0 ( f ) ∘ i M ∘ p Z 0 ( M ) (by (5)) = L 0 ( f ) ∘ d 1 M (by (3)) .
\begin{align*}
d_1^N \circ L_1(f) &= i_N \circ p_{Z_0(N)} \circ L_0(Z_0(f)) & \text{(by (3) and (6))} \\
&= i_N \circ Z_0(f) \circ p_{Z_0(M)} & \text{(by (4))} \\
&= L_0(f) \circ i_M \circ p_{Z_0(M)} & \text{(by (5))} \\
&= L_0(f) \circ d_1^M & \text{(by (3))} .
\end{align*}
d 1 N ∘ L 1 ( f ) = i N ∘ p Z 0 ( N ) ∘ L 0 ( Z 0 ( f )) = i N ∘ Z 0 ( f ) ∘ p Z 0 ( M ) = L 0 ( f ) ∘ i M ∘ p Z 0 ( M ) = L 0 ( f ) ∘ d 1 M (by (3) and (6)) (by (4)) (by (5)) (by (3)) .
When n > 1 n > 1 n > 1 , one has successively
d n N ∘ L n ( f ) = i Z n − 2 ( N ) ∘ p Z n − 1 ( N ) ∘ L 0 ( Z n − 1 ( f ) ) (by (3) and (6)) = i Z n − 2 ( N ) ∘ Z n − 1 ( f ) ∘ p Z n − 1 ( M ) (by (4)) = i Z n − 2 ( N ) ∘ Z 0 ( Z n − 2 ( f ) ) ∘ p Z n − 1 ( M ) (by (6)) = L 0 ( Z n − 2 ( f ) ) ∘ i Z n − 2 ( M ) ∘ p Z n − 1 ( M ) (by (5)) = L n − 1 ( f ) ∘ d n M (by (3) and (6)) .
\begin{align*}
d_n^N \circ L_n(f) &= i_{Z_{n-2}(N)} \circ p_{Z_{n-1}(N)} \circ L_0(Z_{n-1}(f)) & \text{(by (3) and (6))} \\
&= i_{Z_{n-2}(N)} \circ Z_{n-1}(f) \circ p_{Z_{n-1}(M)} & \text{(by (4))} \\
&= i_{Z_{n-2}(N)} \circ Z_0(Z_{n-2}(f)) \circ p_{Z_{n-1}(M)} & \text{(by (6))} \\
&= L_0(Z_{n-2}(f)) \circ i_{Z_{n-2}(M)} \circ p_{Z_{n-1}(M)} & \text{(by (5))} \\
&= L_{n-1}(f) \circ d_n^M & \text{(by (3) and (6))} .
\end{align*}
d n N ∘ L n ( f ) = i Z n − 2 ( N ) ∘ p Z n − 1 ( N ) ∘ L 0 ( Z n − 1 ( f )) = i Z n − 2 ( N ) ∘ Z n − 1 ( f ) ∘ p Z n − 1 ( M ) = i Z n − 2 ( N ) ∘ Z 0 ( Z n − 2 ( f )) ∘ p Z n − 1 ( M ) = L 0 ( Z n − 2 ( f )) ∘ i Z n − 2 ( M ) ∘ p Z n − 1 ( M ) = L n − 1 ( f ) ∘ d n M (by (3) and (6)) (by (4)) (by (6)) (by (5)) (by (3) and (6)) .
One has at once
(7)
L ( 1 M ) = 1 L ( M ) .
L(1_M) = 1_{L(M)} .
L ( 1 M ) = 1 L ( M ) .
On the other hand, if g : N → P g : N \to P g : N → P is an A-homomorphism of a-modules, one has
(8)
L ( g ∘ f ) = L ( g ) ∘ L ( f ) .
L(g \circ f) = L(g) \circ L(f) .
L ( g ∘ f ) = L ( g ) ∘ L ( f ) .
In fact, for m ∈ M m \in M m ∈ M , one has
L 0 ( g ∘ f ) ( e m ) = e g ∘ f ( m ) = L 0 ( g ) ( e f ( m ) ) = L 0 ( g ) ∘ L 0 ( f ) ( e m ) ,
L_0(g \circ f)(e_m) = e_{g \circ f(m)} = L_0(g)(e_{f(m)}) = L_0(g) \circ L_0(f)(e_m) ,
L 0 ( g ∘ f ) ( e m ) = e g ∘ f ( m ) = L 0 ( g ) ( e f ( m ) ) = L 0 ( g ) ∘ L 0 ( f ) ( e m ) , hence
L 0 ( g ∘ f ) = L ( g ) ∘ L ( f ) L_0(g \circ f) = L(g) \circ L(f) L 0 ( g ∘ f ) = L ( g ) ∘ L ( f ) ; consequently
Z 0 ( g ∘ f ) = Z 0 ( g ) ∘ Z 0 ( f ) Z_0(g \circ f) = Z_0(g) \circ Z_0(f) Z 0 ( g ∘ f ) = Z 0 ( g ) ∘ Z 0 ( f ) ; whence at once
L n ( g ∘ f ) = L n ( g ) ∘ L n ( f ) L_n(g \circ f) = L_n(g) \circ L_n(f) L n ( g ∘ f ) = L n ( g ) ∘ L n ( f ) , for
n ⩾ 0 n \geqslant 0 n ⩾ 0 , by induction on
n n n , whence (8).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.
Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.