Lemma 3
Tag 0DU6, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DU6].
Algebra, chapter X, § 3. Résolutions
Let be a complex and let . There exists a complex and a homomorphism such that is an isomorphism for and such that is a free -module. If is noetherian and the -modules and are of finite type, one can require that be of finite type.
a) Let first be a homomorphism of -modules; let denote the differential of . Let be the submodule of formed by the pairs such that ; define a complex by for , , , for , , for and for . Also consider the morphism of complexes such that for , , .
b) The complex is zero in degree and the differential induces an isomorphism of onto , hence .
c) When the composite mapping is surjective, one sees analogously that , and is then a homomorphism (X, p. 31, cor. 2).
d) When is assumed noetherian and the -modules and are of finite type, then is of finite type, by virtue of the exact sequence (X, p. 25)
there then exists a free -module of finite type and a homomorphism such that the condition of c) is satisfied; in the general case, there exists a free module and a surjective homomorphism . This completes the proof.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.