Bourbaki

Proposition 9

Tag 0DU9, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DU9].

Algebra, chapter X, § 3. Résolutions

Let MM be an AA-module and (P,p)(P,p) a projective resolution of MM. Let rr denote the radical of AA. Suppose either that PnP_n is a finitely generated AA-module for every nn, or that rr is nilpotent. Then a necessary and sufficient condition for (P,p)(P,p) to be minimal is that the complex (A/r)⊗AP(A/r)\otimes_A P have zero differential, in other words that

dn+1(Pn+1)⊂rPnfor all n≥0. d_{n+1}(P_{n+1})\subset rP_n\quad\text{for all }n\geq0.

Suppose that (P,p)(P,p) is minimal. By VIII, loc. cit., the homomorphism

1⊗δn:(A/r)⊗APn⟶(A/r)⊗AIm⁡dn 1\otimes\delta_n:(A/r)\otimes_A P_n\longrightarrow(A/r)\otimes_A\operatorname{Im}d_n

is an isomorphism. It then follows from the exact sequence

0⟶Im⁡dn+1→ jn Pn→ δn Im⁡dn⟶0 0\longrightarrow\operatorname{Im}d_{n+1} \xrightarrow{\ j_n\ }P_n \xrightarrow{\ \delta_n\ }\operatorname{Im}d_n \longrightarrow0

that the homomorphism 1⊗jn:(A/r)⊗AIm⁡dn+1→(A/r)⊗APn1 \otimes j_n : (A/r) \otimes_A \operatorname{Im} d_{n+1} \to (A/r) \otimes_A P_n is zero; since dn+1=jn∘δn+1d_{n+1} = j_n \circ \delta_{n+1}, we deduce that 1A/r⊗dn+1=01_{A/r} \otimes d_{n+1} = 0 for n⩾0n \geqslant 0.

Conversely, suppose that for every n⩾1n \geqslant 1, 1⊗dn1 \otimes d_n is zero, in other words that Im⁡dn=Ker⁡dn−1\operatorname{Im} d_n = \operatorname{Ker} d_{n-1} is contained in rPn−1rP_{n-1}. Since δn−1\delta_{n-1} is surjective, it follows from VIII, loc. cit. that δn−1\delta_{n-1} is a projective cover for n⩾1n \geqslant 1, hence that (P,p)(P, p) is minimal.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.