Bourbaki

Remark 2

Tag 0DV3, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DV3].

Algebra, chapter X, § 4. Produits de torsion

For every integer rr, we have (C⊗AC′)(r)=C(r)⊗AC′(C\otimes_A C')(r)=C(r)\otimes_A C', but (C⊗AC′)(r)(C\otimes_A C')(r) and C⊗AC′(r)C\otimes_A C'(r) do not in general have the same differential.

Let p,qp, q be two integers, x∈Zp(C),x′∈Zq(C′)x \in Z_p(C), x' \in Z_q(C'); then the element x⊗x′x \otimes x' of Cp⊗Cq′C_p \otimes C'_q belongs to Zp+q(C⊗C′)Z_{p+q}(C \otimes C') by (1); moreover, if y∈Cp+1,y′∈Cq+1′y \in C_{p+1}, y' \in C'_{q+1}, we have

(x+dy)⊗(x′+d′y′)=x⊗x′+D(y⊗x′+(−1)p(x+dy)⊗y′); (x + dy) \otimes (x' + d'y') = x \otimes x' + D(y \otimes x' + (-1)^p (x + dy) \otimes y');
by passing to the quotients, we deduce a kk-linear mapping, called canonical
γp,q(C,C′):Hp(C)⊗AHq(C′)→Hp+q(C⊗AC′); \gamma_{p,q}(C, C') : H_p(C) \otimes_A H_q(C') \to H_{p+q}(C \otimes_A C');
if we endow H(C)⊗AH(C′)H(C) \otimes_A H(C') with the grading such that
(H(C)⊗H(C′))n=∑p+q=nHp(C)⊗AHq(C′), (H(C) \otimes H(C'))_n = \sum_{p+q=n} H_p(C) \otimes_A H_q(C'),
the γp,q\gamma_{p,q} define a graded kk-linear mapping of degree 0
γ(C,C′):H(C)⊗AH(C′)→H(C⊗AC′). \gamma(C, C') : H(C) \otimes_A H(C') \to H(C \otimes_A C').
Prop. 6 of II, p. 59, can be reformulated as follows:

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.