If the complexes C and C′ are zero on the right, C⊗AC′ is zero on the right and the canonical k-linear mapping
γ0,0(C,C′):H0(C)⊗AH0(C′)→H0(C⊗AC′)
is bijective.
Let u:(C,d)→(C1,d1) be a morphism of complexes of right A-modules and u′:(C′,d′)→(C1′,d1′) a morphism of complexes of left A-modules; then u⊗u′:C⊗AC′→C1⊗AC1′ is a morphism of complexes of k-modules; indeed, it is graded of degree 0, and if we denote by D and D1 the differentials of C⊗C′ and C1⊗C1′, we have for p,q∈Z,x∈Cp,x′∈Cq′,
Let A∘ be the k-algebra opposite to A, C∘ (resp. C′∘) the complex C (resp. C′) considered as a complex of left A∘-modules (resp. right). Let us denote by
σ(C,C′):C⊗AC′→C′∘⊗A∘C∘
the unique graded k-linear mapping of degree 0 such that, for x∈Cp,x′∈Cq′,p,q∈Z, we have
σ(C,C′)(x⊗x′)=(−1)pqx′⊗x.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.